Why the hell would youtube then host someone like Robert Barnes or anyone challenging the election at all? 230 needs reform not repeal. Define good faith and build a presumption of publishing unless certain steps are taken and lines uncrossed. Straight repeal means that random shill could post a bunch of defamatory bullshit here and the webmaster would be on the hook for an arbitrary amount of lawsuits which even if spurious could bankrupt a man or organization easily.
Why the hell would youtube then host someone like Robert Barnes or anyone challenging the election at all? 230 needs reform not repeal. Define good faith and build a presumption of publishing unless certain steps are taken and lines uncrossed. Straight repeal means that random shill could post a bunch of defamatory bullshit here and the webmaster would be on the hook for an arbitrary amount of lawsuits which even if spurious could bankrupt a man or organization easily.