2043
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
Kebobez 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nothing yet?

12
22
ciemPepe 22 points ago +22 / -0

"After waiting over a year to challenge Act 77, and engaging in procedural gamesmanship along the way, they come to this Court with unclean hands and ask it to disenfranchise an entire state. They make that request without any acknowledgment of the s taggering upheaval, turmoil, and acrimony it would unleash. In issuing equitable relief, this Court rightly seeks to avoid inflaming social disorder. So to say that the public interest militates against Petitioners would be a grave understatement. Their suit is nothing less than an affront to constitutional democracy. It should meet a swift and decisive end."

Fuck them all the way to hell Edit: In other words they are more scared of the communists than they are of patriots defending the constitutions, we will see about that

10
Filo76 10 points ago +10 / -0

You know what is ACTUALLY an affront to constitutional democracy?

Cheating and rigging a national election!

Fuck them.

8
Wtf_socialismreally 8 points ago +8 / -0

If they can just get the old bitch and his handlers in the office they can use all the might of the federal government and military to suppress patriots anyway

6
ciemPepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump will not give up, he will use the insurrection act if it gets to that point, otherwise all his family and him will be destroyed

4
glow-operator-2-0 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL that gif. What's it from originally?

1
AT_Finn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think that is originally from Seinfeld

1
glow-operator-2-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks! Gonna check it out.

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago +3 / -0

thanks. have read the meat of it and getting worried.

ignoring all the sections regarding procedural bullshit about how and when the previous cases got filed - if SCOTUS meant to pay credence to that, they would not have allowed case to proceed.

going after merits

. Petitioners’ Federal Claims Are Not Actually Presented Here Because Act 77 is Constitutional

their argument makes sense.

2
NeverInterruptEnemy 2 points ago +2 / -0

How the Governor, Secretary of State, or judges overriding state law is constitutional, I have no idea.

2
iamherefortheluls 2 points ago +3 / -1

i've not seen the original lawsuit, and maybe i am misjudging it based on this response, but the response does not argue in favor of Governor and SoS over-riding anything.

They claim that the meat of the lawsuit it that Act 77 is unconstitutional by state law, and they provide arguments to why they think it is constitutional.