1065
Comments (32)
sorted by:
35
bavarianpesant 35 points ago +35 / -0

can we get away with our cheating pretty please

16
BarronVonSaltzburg26 16 points ago +16 / -0

It will undermine the public trust... pathetic.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
7
Titan93 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's why we NEED to enforce the law on this. There should be ZERO public trust in them at this point.

Honestly I'm expecting there will be a pushback from media oligarchs "because it will undermine public trust". Back all the way off with that nonsense, you dont have a shred of credibility and the nation would be decades ahead without your rubbish

5
AdamBomb 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's almost like committing election fraud on a massive scale has a similar effect or something...

... Unless "opening Pandora's box" with respect to the election fraud this cycle is not new. Are they admitting to recurring entrenched fraud in past elections?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
3
ModernKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indeed. They haven't realized how many of us there are and how furious we are.

I tried to find a video of Daffy Duck opening a door and Elmer Fud shooting his beak off, but I can't find it. I'm sure that happened at least once.

20
CivilWarrior 20 points ago +20 / -0

LOL man that's so bad it's almost funny.

Dummiecrats broke trust in constitutional order when they cheated on a mass scale, and their argument is "muh constitution, muh order"...

If I didn't laugh, I'd cry.

20
BillieJean123 20 points ago +20 / -0

That is the WORST preliminary statement ever. If I were Alito and I read that, I would have steam coming out of my ears.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
Sugar4Brains 5 points ago +5 / -0

that's what Bolsheviks do

16
shade1k 16 points ago +16 / -0

Wait, wait... they quoted the Wisconsin suit?? The one that didn't even really make a ruling, but just said "yeah but you have to file in a lower court first"??!

That was what they chose to open with?! A procedural ruling from 3 days ago?!

We may need more popcorn.

12
VoterIDMatters 12 points ago +12 / -0

it’s such a bullshit argument

no court has overturned a governor’s certification because no governor has certified before

6
Grindelwald 6 points ago +6 / -0

Justice Alito's response: Pursuant to Defenses' plea to not hold Governors, Secretaries of State and election officials accountable to the Constitution of the United States of America because it makes them unduly butt hurt. The Supreme Court of the United States of America will not grant certiorari and rules for all time to come the influence of corrupt Democrats and their foreign influences to be immune from prosecution, with prejudice.

1
AedraLord 1 point ago +1 / -0

unduly butthurt

LMFAO!!!

5
watchman87 5 points ago +5 / -0

lol yeah they don't want him to follow the law obviously

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
capefog 9 points ago +9 / -0

They are trying to use the argument from a shitty, compromised Wisconsin decision from a couple of days ago as if it is settled precedent. "One lies and the other swears to it."

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
Almagest [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's citing a previous WI decision but this statement is from a PA case on the SCOTUS

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
Floppydopoulos 4 points ago +4 / -0

Get fucked you commie sons on bitches!

4
Sheprecon31 4 points ago +4 / -0

IT'S TIME TO START RUNNING

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
wwwchae 3 points ago +3 / -0

HA HA constitution go bbrrrrr

2
Tendie_inspector 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds a whole lot like the bullshit

Sources and methods

excuse

2
The_banned 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Plz, no" -globalists, when faced with the wrath of the true United States.

1
jamesjk1234 1 point ago +1 / -0

anyone have the text? twitter is blocked at my work

1
EvanOnTheFly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Executive enforces. Judicial interprets.

1
SmokeyAF 1 point ago +1 / -0

....and, the public trust is already lost, to be restored by Alito and other Constitutional adherents.

1
blueyedjonesy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like something Mrs. Parent would write lol