Seems like a weak defensive strategy while defending election fraud. Orangemanbad? Really? The issues put forward to the SCOTUS do not even need to consider who the president is. That is not
what needs to be deliberated . They broke laws and cheated. They committed high crimes and subverted the constitution.
well if thats their rebuttal then we are gonna win easily
Glad to see PA is unaware the social order is already in disorder from blatant fraud perpetrated against all Pennsylvanians.
Oh, so that is a threat from the left. "give us what we want, or we will initiate violent protests".
LMAO, I don't think the court will like being threatened
Seems like a weak defensive strategy while defending election fraud. Orangemanbad? Really? The issues put forward to the SCOTUS do not even need to consider who the president is. That is not what needs to be deliberated . They broke laws and cheated. They committed high crimes and subverted the constitution.
Judge is a blm wokey.