4868
Comments (231)
sorted by:
191
Sherlocks_Pocket 191 points ago +191 / -0

Math 🤓

87
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 87 points ago +87 / -0

IssSSs WwWXCRaCiSiT!!!!

56
humped2424 56 points ago +56 / -0

Damn no wonder why the liberals were saying this earlier in the year they were prepping for this !

65
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 65 points ago +66 / -1

Hijacking to provide the source information about the math.

Page 13 of 92 bullet point 10.

https://www.scribd.com/document/487348469/TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07-FINAL

  1. The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States — Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin —independently given President Trump’s early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4,2020, is less than one in a quadrillion, or 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000. For former Vice President Biden to win these four States collectively, the odds of that event happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power (i.e., 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000^4). see Decl. of Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D. ("Cicchetti Decl.") at 14-21, 30-31 See App 4a-7a, 9a.

So apparently it's from this Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D guy.

58
deleted 58 points ago +58 / -0
14
45fan 14 points ago +14 / -0

Oh no! He's dead! I guess we never should have left him alone in that room with Covid and Democrats! Damn you Coviiiiiiid!

8
FinalDeliverance 8 points ago +8 / -0

Correct, the chances of dying of covid as a corpse is 0, but you can still vote.....

......4 times....

4
thunder_monkey 4 points ago +5 / -1

less than one quadrillion to the fourth power is how many fake ballots they tried to stuff thru the system!

1
KS-76- 1 point ago +1 / -0

And in multiple swing states.

6
ISchiffedMyPants 6 points ago +6 / -0

Boom, top kek!

5
Paradyme 5 points ago +5 / -0

KEK

5
Smooth_Kahuna 5 points ago +5 / -0

Love it, but the old Teacher in me is "Show Your Work"

3
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's in appendix 4a-7a, 9a. Which was not attached to the lawsuit document on scribd.com

2
Smooth_Kahuna 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks

1
Elfer 1 point ago +2 / -1

I took a look through it and it rests on a couple of dubious assumptions:

  • Biden and Clinton can be assumed to have identical levels of support

  • There is no association between candidate preference and choosing to vote by mail or in person

If you applied the same logic, Trump's massive lead on election night would also appear "impossible"

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
ChiKAGo 1 point ago +2 / -1

Charles J. Cicchetti Professor

Charles J. Cicchetti is a member of Pacific Economics Group, a senior advisor to Pacific Economics Group Research, and a Professor of Economics at the University of Southern California.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
BlightBane 5 points ago +5 / -0

Man the deport button!

14
asdf1234567 14 points ago +14 / -0

guess what 2+2=4 3x3=9 2^2=4 5X5+6=31 56/7=8 DEAL WITH IT!!!!!!!

I Know it was a joke, I wanted to show of my math skills 🤓

4
Licensetomeme 4 points ago +4 / -0

That looks like some labcoat geek jargon to me but I’m sure it checks out.

3
RabidZoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was elementary math as far as I can tell. I must be missing it too fren...?

3
Licensetomeme 3 points ago +3 / -0

Haha. I joke. Arithmetic is fun. I used to do driIIs like that so much..... Some do it to the point where it’s just like seeing a word if you can imagine that.

1
manwithasham 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prime factorization of large-ish numbers, by hand. Is not fun

1
Licensetomeme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha.... Ever watch Cube?

5
TheBusiness 5 points ago +5 / -0

Learn to code biggot! Wax muh balls! wayyyycissst

2
PresElectDeezNuts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Will Deez Nuts do?

2
ArchbishopofKekistan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can ehere to say that. Couldn't harness that level of REEEEE if I tried.

2
DontArkancideMeBro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Top Kek!

22
-2b- 22 points ago +22 / -0

GET YOUR STATE TO JOIN TEXAS’ LAWSUIT- CONTACT YOUR STATE’S ATTORNEY GENERAL! 🇺🇸 📣 ⚖️ 🏛 ⚖️ 📣 🇺🇸

(your state's attorney responsible for filing the lawsuits)

Find them here:

https://www.usa.gov/state-attorney-general

17
-2b- 17 points ago +17 / -0

🇺🇸 South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson 🇺🇸

http://www.scag.gov

EMAIL: [email protected]

1-803-734-3970

Online Contact Form http://www.scag.gov/contact-us/contact-us

https://www.facebook.com/AGAlanWilson

https://twitter.com/SCAttyGenOffice

Mailing Address

The Honorable Alan Wilson

P.O. Box 11549

Columbia, S.C. 29211

Office Location

Rembert Dennis Building

1000 Assembly Street, Room 519

Columbia, S.C. 29201

EXAMPLE TEXT (SHORT AND SWEET):

I support Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, recently filed at the Supreme Court.

As a voting resident, I encourage South Carolina to join the lawsuit.

LINK TO TEXAS' LAWSUIT:

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=

SEE POST: https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTotBZ2/south-carolina-pedes-contact-our/c/

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
-2b- 5 points ago +5 / -0

Awesome and thanks!

20
TyrantsAreCucks 20 points ago +20 / -0

"I fucking love STEM! Except for when it exposes our commie plots to undermine the legal and moral foundation of western nations!"

8
Jakefoy92 8 points ago +8 / -0

Quik-maffs

3
TheJimmReaper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kwik-maffs is wacist

3
JASOHNHKSUCKS132 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sean hannitty baptist church street scotch charge

6
Donlurker 6 points ago +6 / -0

👍

147
deleted 147 points ago +147 / -0
80
Thingthing22 80 points ago +81 / -1

The moment it happens Trump will declare the insurrection act and activate the NatGaurd. He's going to go scorched earth.

46
DemsFuckKids 46 points ago +50 / -4

careful, big expectations lead to big disappointments

12
Viewer01 12 points ago +14 / -2

https://thedonald.win/p/11QlPCmd78/big-if-true-makes-sense-though-y/c/

Check the date of the larp. Hell of a guess, given that antifa didn’t crop up until 2020. Further, Trump wouldn’t drop the act on a whim.

12
tw1stynipple 12 points ago +12 / -0

Antifa have been around for like 4+ years ?

9
Viewer01 9 points ago +11 / -2

The riots didn't start until this year. No one was talking about marital law until ~march/April

5
tw1stynipple 5 points ago +5 / -0

yeah on the riots point that's very true but they have been active and violently protesting for the last 2 years and at the first couple of years it was just busting the universities balls.

5
stjimmy92 5 points ago +5 / -0

Antifa has been around for a lot longer, it was mainly just a European thing.

3
Viewer01 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree, however the logic I'm trying to exercise here is that if this really is a LARP, it is a very lucky one. Why? Because there wasn't massive civil unrest. So there wasn't anything in the public consciousness that would give someone the creative idea that Trump was trying to declare insurrection in '19.

This LARP happened in Feb, which is about the time after the holidays you'd expect for courts and the like to spin back up. The mid terms happened on Nov 6 '18. So ~3 months after a presumed stolen election, trump is supposedly in a secret court asking the SCOTUS to let him round up enemy combatants.

Then almost immediately after the riots starts trump wants to drop the act? Why? Its such a drastic measure in an election year. The reason is he already had the blessing of the courts to do it, and he could then preempt this shit show we are in now.

1
Gstreetshit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Been around for decades

1
MAGAMAN300 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not big expectations. Just facts.. See this happens one way or another.. This has been planned for years..

1
DemsFuckKids 1 point ago +1 / -0

until there an official statement you're foil hatting

21
CitizenPlain 21 points ago +21 / -0

I actually believe this will happen. It will happen which ever side wins. This is why it is SOOO important we win the WH.

2
Doctor_Strangelove 2 points ago +2 / -0

Insurrection Act is in our future for sure. And cannot come soon enough

-1
deleted -1 points ago +20 / -21
27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
DontArkancideMeBro 5 points ago +5 / -0

Private Pyle what have you done to my beloved corps!?!

2
TarHeelMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

How? How can anyone support Biden? Do they not know that he is a retarded potato, at this point? Now, if you hate President Trump, I could at least understand that, while not agreeing with you at all. But, support Biden? How?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Labaladeplata 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can always spot the guys who have never served because they think there are no Democrats in the services lol

Twenty years ago it was probably 80% based patriots. When I left in '13 it was very different.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
14
TyrantsAreCucks 14 points ago +14 / -0

Tell them to check out all of the fun federal death penalty methods that are back on the table.

9
Animator 9 points ago +9 / -0

A Ranger and antifa supporter?! Ugh, how does this happen? What's happened to our military? Really sad to hear.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
5
Animator 5 points ago +5 / -0

Gross. Glad he's not in the service anymore at least. TDS is a helluva thing.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
Animator 4 points ago +4 / -0

The cancer is everywhere.

2
TarHeelMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this in Portland, or something?

7
Dereliction 7 points ago +7 / -0

It will go both ways, to be sure. It's hard to imagine there are more antifa-types willing to fight a civil war than there are patriots, inside and out of the military.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
Liberty0rdeath 7 points ago +7 / -0

Do you really think they will fight for Biden? I mean come on, that’s no leader. More likely huge civil unrest, which is why POTUS wants the soldiers from Somalia home.

It’s not that easy to defect from the military, you know what happens to those who do? I don’t think they want to either when evidence of foreign influence on the election by China. That’s why it’s very important with the clip from Tucker today.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
4
DontArkancideMeBro 4 points ago +4 / -0

Step 1: write “communism will win under your hat. Step 2: show it to top military Obama appointees. Step 3: ????? Step 4: Profit

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
marishiten 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd imagine full bird colonels being commie. That's pretty high up in the food chain.

2nd/1st Lieutenants, Captains, MAYBE Majors would be pretty down to earth. Lieutenant Colonels, Colonels, BMLG are most likely to be commie scum. In the US Army that is.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
highmoves 0 points ago +2 / -2

Get your frag on

5
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s not that easy to defect from the military, you know what happens to those who do?

They turn over 5 terrorist to get you out of a foreign prison and fine you $10,000

3
Foxtrot1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look at the civil war.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
24
Ragnar_Danneskjold 24 points ago +24 / -0

And that does not mean just buy more guns and ammo

Medical training and supplies. Coms gear. Learn radio spectrums and how radio works, what radios do what, where, and how. Get in shape. Be able to quickly identify cover and concealment and tell the difference between the two on the fly. Understand basic small unit tactics like cover and flanking, bounding, response to close contact vs. response to far contact, etc.

Mindset>Skillset>Toolset, in order of importance. And having guns and ammo doesn't even fully satisfy just the least important factor; toolset. There's a lot of work to do. Stop looking at your 5th AR-15 you want to buy on Gunbroker and go buy some pressure bandages and tourniquets, enough to both use and some dedicated just to train with. You don't need another 500rds of 9 mil. You do need a decent dual band radio and know how to use it.

12
edxzxz 12 points ago +12 / -0

WTF do I need medical training for - I've been told that all I need to do is buy a hat that says 'MEDIC' on it?

11
Ragnar_Danneskjold 11 points ago +11 / -0

Kek. If you want to go that route, forget what I said about coms gear and bandages. Get yourself a nice thick butt plug and you'll be fine ;)

6
edxzxz 6 points ago +6 / -0

And dildos, one can not seriously propose going into battle without an ample supply of dildos!

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
Foxtrot1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I picked out the cool patch with a o+ on it. Its wicked.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
13
Ragnar_Danneskjold 13 points ago +13 / -0

Not looking for you to doxx yourself, but you anywhere near DFW? I'm former Army and also in Texas and I'm basically by myself. I'd love to find some chill pedes who know what's up to just do some training with. Not looking for any kooky militant shit, for you FBI agents reading this, just want to get out there with some Texan Patriots and do some fun and useful shit.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
locien 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mindset>Skillset>Toolset

Wisdom

4
RamblinMan67 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hell, I am O-, when the shooting starts I just have to walk around with a big sign on me that says O-. Both sides will want me alive.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
L0k3y_kush 3 points ago +3 / -0

NW San Antonio here.

2
Animator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Austin area here, too.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
GoingCamaro 2 points ago +2 / -0

99% of them will scrub their social medias and pretend to be moderates. Some will even go as far as to buy MAGA hats. Leftists are fickle. They won't fight more than a week.

69
Rusty_Bungus 69 points ago +69 / -0

"So you are saying it was possible?" - Probably some retarded left-wing activist judge

19
CisSiberianOrchestra 19 points ago +19 / -0

"So you're telling me there's a chance?" -Lloyd Christmas

7
peeje172 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lloyd had a better shot with Mary Swanson aka Mary Samsonite than Biden did winning these states.

2
oocanada 2 points ago +2 / -0

he must workout

5
WishdoctorsSong 5 points ago +5 / -0

TFW Leftwing Dems are taking cues from Dumb and Dumber.

52
brogarn 52 points ago +52 / -0

All this shit hitting at once. The SCOTUS, the Manchurian Swalwell Candidate and the Cantonese Kemp. MY HEART CAN'T TAKE ALL THIS HAPPENING AT ONCE!

FFS I was blue balled for 4 happening years!

I mean, what other point is the Chinese leaks other than to get Americans knowing what's coming before the hammer drops? This has got to be optics, right?

24
Liberty0rdeath 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yes it’s optics. Trump has a hard time on the information war and need it out there before he makes the move. Tuckers segment today was not a coincidence.

The country can unite against a common enemy; China.

Instead of military dividing and pointing fingers at each other we can now point them to China. That’s why POTUS wants 230 removed, he doesn’t want big tech to spin the narrative.

8
ScrewReddit 8 points ago +8 / -0

The country can unite against a common enemy; China.

Good point. The Robbers Cave Experiment showed that opposing sides will unify will faced with a common enemy.

6
Liberty0rdeath 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes.

Or aliens.

2
PhoneBandit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those little green bastards.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Liberty0rdeath 1 point ago +1 / -0

While true it might just be temporary until he get the narrative under control.

POTUS will not fail alternative media, it’s the reason he is where he is. He has a plan.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
8
brogarn 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dude? How could I? Why do you think I've been f5'ing TDW all morning? Puppies man! PUPPIES!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
25
EverTrumper2020 25 points ago +25 / -0

So you’re telling me there’s a chance...😂😂

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
magagaLady 2 points ago +2 / -0

🤣🤣

22
Garbage_Day 22 points ago +22 / -0

Don't take this as some sort of future outcome of the election. Everyone knows Biden won with the illegal votes. The real war at this point is with the deep state and getting judges to overturn the reults.

18
Postal 18 points ago +19 / -1

Science is real..... hahaha

13
Karl_Maldens_Nose 13 points ago +13 / -0

Is there an analysis that JW did to get to that number? Absolutely incredible. Joey had a better chance of winning the Chinese Lottery. Not doubting for a second, Tom and the rest are an honorable crew I just couldn't find anything on their website.

6
DemsFuckKids 6 points ago +6 / -0

would love to see the maths, also

8
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 8 points ago +9 / -1

Edit: Page 13 of 92 bullet point 10.

  1. The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States — Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin —independently given President Trump’s early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4,2020, is less than one in a quadrillion, or 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000. For former Vice President Biden to win these four States collectively, the odds of that event happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power (i.e., 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000^4). see Decl. of Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D. ("Cicchetti Decl.") at 14-21, 30-31 See App 4a-7a, 9a.

So apparently it's from this Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D guy.

They are taking it from the lawsuit. Let me see if I can find it, I think it was only like 60 pages or so.

2
vicentezo04 2 points ago +2 / -0

USC economics professor, so I respect his opinion. However if anybody can find his original affidavit, please link it here so I can read for myself.

1
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think it was attached to the lawsuit but not included in that link. I'm sure it's online somewhere.

1
tremendous_trump2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

He pretty much did win the chinese lottery, thanks to the bribes funnelled from China through Hunter. Problem is, China wants a huge return on it's investment and if Biden doesn't deliver they're not going to be happy with him.

11
Woohan 11 points ago +11 / -0

A quadrillionth of a quadrillionth to the 32nd power! Let's do this.

3
AlphaNathan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Still seems high.

9
Drewniverse 9 points ago +9 / -0

BUT BUT THERE'S STILL A CHANCE!

Checkmate bigots!

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
patslimmy1 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's a lot of numbers

5
RainingFrogs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Either do math or be a Democrat.

Pick a side, folks, we're at war.

3
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you're saying there's a chance, lol

3
Redpill-notCommieRed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dominion math says Biden has it in the bag, but the Supreme Court doesn't deal in decimal points on their votes.

3
MAGA_100X 3 points ago +3 / -0

Man, that's a lot of zeroes!

1
AedraLord 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's 60 zeros!

1
linereddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would that be about as likely as picking the right hydrogen atom out of three thousand suns the size of ours?

3
Toothdaddy 3 points ago +3 / -0

so your saying there's a chance

1
Cc1005 1 point ago +1 / -0

🤣

3
WilliamHRacy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not a math guy, but that sounds like a very, very small number.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
xkgb 2 points ago +3 / -1

So YoU'rE sAyInG tHeRe'S a ChAnCe?

2
GoingCamaro 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's more likely the Big Bang happened by accident...

2
dahdahdah_dahditdah 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meh, their math is shaky, and I wouldn't want to live or die by it. In the end it's not a matter of odds, but of proven cheating. The excesses of ballots without registered voters and Matt Braynard's factual showing of fraudulent ballots prove that this is not just a case of a really good and targeted get-out-the-mail-in-vote (which is their expected rebuttal to the mathematical odds claim). This extends way beyond that into fraud, cheating, and absolutely destruction of our electoral integrity.

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

spez: I should add that many of the mathematical odds claims are totally legit and should be considered by SCOTUS, including non organic birthday patterns, illegitimate dates of ballot return, "I see dead people voting," etc.

2
Sheprecon31 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been following this bloke for a while he's a straight shooter Trump needs to get this man a job when he's realected

2
DemDestroyer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice.. I love the maths 1 in 1 x 10^60 for Biden to pull that off...
or 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

1
Margincrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not common core math. They do not understand.

1
PepeAmericusMaximus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden team: "So, you're telling me there's a chance"....

1
Eazi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tom Fitton is the very essence of the word "dogged". How many times he has left egg on the face of these deep staters, is truly remarkable. He understands the complete fuckery of these social parasites.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 1 point ago +2 / -1

Does anyone have the relevant section of the lawsuit that discusses this statistical anomaly?

1
Rothbard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leftist shouldnt have left STEM to the right...

1
Choppermagic 1 point ago +1 / -0

no. That is still WAAAAY too high a chance for Creepy Joe

1
comoragh 1 point ago +1 / -0

A liberal retired lawyer I know thinks this isn't proof because he doesn't understand statistical data. Unsurprisingly he was a government lawyer, so intelligence was never necessary for him to brainlessly prosecute minor offenses.

1
Infidel440 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, Biden should have bought a lottery ticket that day.

1
the_great_REEEset 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probabilities!?! Racist...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
magaroll 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not that I disagree with the odds but isn't saying this make us look like the polls made them look when they said Hillary had a 99.5 chance of winning.

abstract facts don't work on anyone. We need arrest based on evidence like say arresting the people on video for scanning same stack of ballots twice

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you're saying there's a chance?

1
Sum_devil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Odds of Supreme Court cowering to the mob might be greater than that tho.

1
MagaChamp253 1 point ago +1 / -0

Math has been DEBOOOONKED

1
iamjohnwick 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll take those odds any day, and twice on Sunday. God bless Texas.

1
ShakeYourTrumpThang 1 point ago +1 / -0

Math is science, so if we are to always believe science, this is settled.

1
DJQ2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

The salt is flowing so hard in the replies on twitter. RWEEE!

1
Diet_Loam 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this a quote from the lawsuit?

1
Sapphire2Sea 1 point ago +1 / -0

"less than one..." that aptly summarizes Biden to a tee.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
The_RedWolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

What page is that line on?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Psyop2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

MAGA is the quadrillion in this equation