The Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, that you cannot allow voting to continue after election day:
“When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)
If an election is consummated after Election Day, this also violates the statute, and such behavior, along with State legislation that encourages it, is preempted by 3 U.S.C. § 1. The logic of such a prohibition goes directly to the heart of the evils Congress sought to nullify by creating a uniform Election Day.
Single day elections curtail a distortion of the voting process by concealing results that might influence later voting. The “object” of 2 U.S.C. § 7, as noted by the Supreme Court, was to remedy multiple evils involved with non-uniform voting. Therefore, under the unanimous holding in Foster v. Love, federal elections consummated before, and after, Election Day, are preempted by Congressional statutes.
Federal law absolutely prohibits any voting to continue after election day, as did state law in Pennsylvania. It's time for this nonsense to stop.
Also, if someone can figure out a way to distill this into a digestible meme or infographic format, you'd be doing God's work.
The issue I see with this is how do you PROVE that these votes were filled out and cast the day after when they've been backdating stuff and just lying when writing out forms?
We already have lots of witnesses who state they observed the back-dating of ballots. Election workers, postal employees, etc. Call them as witnesses.
The evidence is overwhelming, which is why these leftist judges keep dismissing the lawsuits without allowing any hearings on the evidence. While that's annoying, it's going to be good for us in the long-term, because a district court's findings of fact are hard to overturn, while findings of law are much easier to overturn.
If they were really thinking about long-term strategy (like Trump does), they would have allowed the evidence to be presented, and issued a finding that it doesn't prove anything. But they would run the risk of people actually paying attention to the evidence, which could turn public opinion completely against them. So, they decided to dismiss everything and pray the Supreme Court can be intimidated into letting it happen.
"How can we have a 'fair' election if we are not allowed to cheat?" - Pennsylvania
The Supreme Court has ruled, 9-0, that you cannot allow voting to continue after election day:
Federal law absolutely prohibits any voting to continue after election day, as did state law in Pennsylvania. It's time for this nonsense to stop.
Also, if someone can figure out a way to distill this into a digestible meme or infographic format, you'd be doing God's work.
The issue I see with this is how do you PROVE that these votes were filled out and cast the day after when they've been backdating stuff and just lying when writing out forms?
We already have lots of witnesses who state they observed the back-dating of ballots. Election workers, postal employees, etc. Call them as witnesses.
The evidence is overwhelming, which is why these leftist judges keep dismissing the lawsuits without allowing any hearings on the evidence. While that's annoying, it's going to be good for us in the long-term, because a district court's findings of fact are hard to overturn, while findings of law are much easier to overturn.
If they were really thinking about long-term strategy (like Trump does), they would have allowed the evidence to be presented, and issued a finding that it doesn't prove anything. But they would run the risk of people actually paying attention to the evidence, which could turn public opinion completely against them. So, they decided to dismiss everything and pray the Supreme Court can be intimidated into letting it happen.