I'd like to request that you join Texas in the State of Texas v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, and State of Wisconsin. We need to defend our constitutional rights as voters and prevent a fraud of this magnitude from corrupting our political landscape for years to come. We owe it every U.S. citizen to stand up and fight for this sacred right to vote and for our votes to count. We, the people of Indiana, NEED you to back Texas in this effort.
Nice to see some different templates. Here's what I've been using and spreading around to other states.
Dear Honourable Curtis T. Hill, Jr. and Staff;
Good morning. My name is *********** from ***********, IN. The reason I am contacting you today is because, like many Hoosiers, I feel that other states are violating the Constitution of the United States in their handling of the November 3rd election. In brief, the argument is this: Several states have sidestepped their own state legislatures and the Constitution to make drastic changes to election laws and rules - especially pertaining to mail-in ballots. This was done through executive actions instead of legislative ones.
Texas has now sued Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania for this very reason. I respectfully ask that you, as our Attorney General file a similar suit on behalf of the State of Indiana.
From the filing to SCOTUS: Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. I feel that these are simple yet solid constitutional arguments and I feel it would be appropriate to file a similar suit on our behalf. Why do these states get to change the rules while the rest of us played by them?
Indiana has 11 Electoral Votes in this game. That's significant. We want to submit our very valuable EC votes to a lawful and fair election, not just toss them into the abyss of a beclouded outcome caused by other states.
Good morning. The reason I am contacting you today is because I feel that other states are disenfranchising the voters of (((State)))) who painstakingly fight for fair and vetted elections. Why do we have a fair election if others will not uphold the same standard, thereby depriving our states voters a lawfully elected President? In brief, the argument is this: Several states have sidestepped their own state legislatures and the Constitution to make drastic changes to election laws and rules - especially pertaining to mail-in ballots. This was done through executive actions instead of legislative ones.
Texas has now sued Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania for this very reason. I respectfully ask that you, as our Attorney General file a similar suit on behalf of the State of ((((State)))).
From the filing to SCOTUS: Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. I feel that these are simple yet solid constitutional arguments and I feel it would be appropriate to file a similar suit on our behalf. Why do these states get to change the rules while the rest of us played by them?
Thank you for the script!!! Used it for Ohio in my call to the AG.
All the response was that he’d pass it along to him... I don’t feel confident that he will lol but idk I’m a first time called dont know what to expect
Fellow Ohioan here. I contacted the Office of AG Dave Yost and made sure my family did too. I even got hold of my friend in FL to tell him to contact Ashely Moody, FL's AG, which he did. Things are heating up! Spread the word.
My name is [OfficerNasty] and I am a lifelong [North Dakota] resident. I am wondering about the stance of the [North Dakota] AG office with regards to the Texas Election Lawsuit that is being filed to protect our elections.
Please join the state of Texas and AG Ken Paxton in this fight to defend our constitutional republic from the corruption that took place in key swing states during the 2020 election. We the people of [North Dakota] deserve to have our voices heard. We need to let them know that we will not stand for this injustice, and that the sanctity of the voting process is in the balance.
This is great to hear! Burgum has proven to be a piece of shit so we'll just have to forget about him for the time being. Stenehjem has been questionable to good in the past so I guess we'll see rather soon what he chooses to do with this.
Done for Indiana!
Contact:
https://www.in.gov/attorneygeneral/3063.htm
Good Afternoon AG Hill,
I'd like to request that you join Texas in the State of Texas v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, and State of Wisconsin. We need to defend our constitutional rights as voters and prevent a fraud of this magnitude from corrupting our political landscape for years to come. We owe it every U.S. citizen to stand up and fight for this sacred right to vote and for our votes to count. We, the people of Indiana, NEED you to back Texas in this effort.
Thanks for your time.
Nice to see some different templates. Here's what I've been using and spreading around to other states.
Dear Honourable Curtis T. Hill, Jr. and Staff;
Good morning. My name is *********** from ***********, IN. The reason I am contacting you today is because, like many Hoosiers, I feel that other states are violating the Constitution of the United States in their handling of the November 3rd election. In brief, the argument is this: Several states have sidestepped their own state legislatures and the Constitution to make drastic changes to election laws and rules - especially pertaining to mail-in ballots. This was done through executive actions instead of legislative ones.
Texas has now sued Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania for this very reason. I respectfully ask that you, as our Attorney General file a similar suit on behalf of the State of Indiana.
From the filing to SCOTUS: Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. I feel that these are simple yet solid constitutional arguments and I feel it would be appropriate to file a similar suit on our behalf. Why do these states get to change the rules while the rest of us played by them?
Indiana has 11 Electoral Votes in this game. That's significant. We want to submit our very valuable EC votes to a lawful and fair election, not just toss them into the abyss of a beclouded outcome caused by other states.
Link to article with copy of full complaint: https://www.scribd.com/document/487348469/TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07-FINAL
Thank you very much for your time in considering this matter.
Respectfully,
They might block a scribd link. Go with the official .gov link.
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf
Thank you based pede. Will change in all new postings!
Just sent mine in!
I changed a few things.
Good morning. The reason I am contacting you today is because I feel that other states are disenfranchising the voters of (((State)))) who painstakingly fight for fair and vetted elections. Why do we have a fair election if others will not uphold the same standard, thereby depriving our states voters a lawfully elected President? In brief, the argument is this: Several states have sidestepped their own state legislatures and the Constitution to make drastic changes to election laws and rules - especially pertaining to mail-in ballots. This was done through executive actions instead of legislative ones.
Texas has now sued Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania for this very reason. I respectfully ask that you, as our Attorney General file a similar suit on behalf of the State of ((((State)))).
From the filing to SCOTUS: Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. I feel that these are simple yet solid constitutional arguments and I feel it would be appropriate to file a similar suit on our behalf. Why do these states get to change the rules while the rest of us played by them?
Thank You for Your Time
High chance they tldr.
Exactly. 2 paragraphs max. They know what’s going on.
Very good!! Nice job!
Thank you for the script!!! Used it for Ohio in my call to the AG.
All the response was that he’d pass it along to him... I don’t feel confident that he will lol but idk I’m a first time called dont know what to expect
Fellow Ohioan here. I contacted the Office of AG Dave Yost and made sure my family did too. I even got hold of my friend in FL to tell him to contact Ashely Moody, FL's AG, which he did. Things are heating up! Spread the word.
Another Ohioan here. Edited and made small adjustments to the template above. Another email sent to the AG's office.
Way to be patriot. Your country thanks you!
Used my own script. Just sent.
Referenced the great patriots in Texas and asked for support from him.
Refer to the lawsuit with this link:
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf
Spez to include my template:
Hello Attorney General [Wayne Stenehjem],
My name is [OfficerNasty] and I am a lifelong [North Dakota] resident. I am wondering about the stance of the [North Dakota] AG office with regards to the Texas Election Lawsuit that is being filed to protect our elections.
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf
Please join the state of Texas and AG Ken Paxton in this fight to defend our constitutional republic from the corruption that took place in key swing states during the 2020 election. We the people of [North Dakota] deserve to have our voices heard. We need to let them know that we will not stand for this injustice, and that the sanctity of the voting process is in the balance.
Regards,
[OfficerNasty]
Good add!
I called Wayne Stenehjem today about this, and the lady who answered added my name to a list. She said she had been taking calls all day about it.
This is great to hear! Burgum has proven to be a piece of shit so we'll just have to forget about him for the time being. Stenehjem has been questionable to good in the past so I guess we'll see rather soon what he chooses to do with this.
Sent. Thanks, Pede!