595
Comments (33)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Hiya12345 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here a script someone else posted, I updated for Kansas.

Dear Attorney General Derek Schmidt and Staff; Good morning. My name is _____ from _____. The reason I am contacting you today is because, like many, I feel that other states are violating the Constitution of the United States in their handling of the November 3rd election. In brief, the argument is this: Several states have sidestepped their own state legislatures and the Constitution to make drastic changes to election laws and rules - especially pertaining to mail-in ballots. This was done through executive actions instead of legislative ones. Texas has now sued Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania for this very reason. I respectfully ask that you, as our Attorney General file a similar suit on behalf of the State of Kansas. From the filing to SCOTUS: Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution. Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. I feel that these are simple yet solid constitutional arguments and I feel it would be appropriate to file a similar suit on our behalf. Why do these states get to change the rules while the rest of us played by them? Kansas has 6 Electoral Votes. We want to submit our EC votes to a lawful and fair election, not just toss them into the abyss of a beclouded outcome caused by other states. Link to article with copy of full complaint: https://www.scribd.com/document/487348469/TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07-FINAL Thank you very much for your time in considering this matter. Respectfully,

2
elinks 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wrote to Derek Schmidt this AM: Here is a much shorter version that I wrote:
I have contacted your office in the past to inquire if you and your office are willing to defend the constitutional rights of Kansas citizens and never received a response. Therefor I am writing again to ask if your office is considering enjoining the State of Texas in their suit against the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin who have violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. When other states conduct federal elections that do not adhere to the Constitution they violate the rights of Kansans to have fair and free elections. I/we did not elect you and your office to stand by while our constitutional rights are being violated. Please consider standing up for the rights of all Kansans.

1
JustANormalAmerican [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you brother!