There is a good argument to be made that the bioweapon they released mutated into a less lethal form fairly quickly once it was ‘in the wild’.
The mask mandates were put in place on the assumption that the virus was deadly using ‘best information available at the time’ — and the hysterical mindset of ‘muh we’ve got to do something!! — and they failed any evidence-based practice standard, medical standard, and logical reasoning even at that point.
The one thing they quickly understood it to be was a symbol — of the pandemic, of fear, of compliance, of conformity, of state power, and of political narrative-pushing (and leftists clearly understand it as a method for communistic rules-enforcement aggression).
Now we have these potential risks from vaccine failing to be weighed against the diminishing potential risks from CCP virus infection.
One can certainly consider developing them a good idea in the face of an unknown biological weapon — but deploying them, particularly after we’ve learned better methods for assessing and addressing the problem? That’s a whole other question!
It’s even more poignant given the contrast between attempting to rush forced novel retroviral RNA virus-like nano-tech vs. the freakout over HCQ as ‘untested’, since HCQ had a 50-year safety record and had been handed out like candy in Africa by the CDC itself for all those years.
Given that the primary lethal factor of the virus involves its provoking immune system reactivity from currently unknown direct causes, distribution of a vaccine that mimics a portion of the virus seems inherently HIGH RISK.
The vaccine basically introduces a ‘virus-like’ artificially-created biomechanism that invades some of your cells, takes them over like the virus, and then starts producing copies of the ‘spike’ portion of the virus instead of the entire virus — then the spikes go attach to and clog up all the spike receptors that the virus uses to get inside cells. That method of action, the biomechanism, and the ‘lipid coating’ it’s sort of ‘wrapped in’ to prolong its presence inside your body are all untested, short of the emergency use authorization studies for emergency approval.
The biomechanism has unknown effects as it is kind of like a virus itself — it keeps going pumping out copies of those proteins until the cell that it hijacked dies.
The method of action has been attempted unsuccessfully for 15 years or so...
And the ‘lipid coating’ portion is commonly used for drugs that are ingested, but never before used for injected drugs.
It’s a disaster in the making, especially if we get it forced on people with the same mindless bureaucratic brutish methods with which masks were.
Anybody who wants it can have it. Same as any other vaccine, if they get it it shouldn't matter if we don't unless it doesn't actually work in which case why did they take it?
But what if it does work? Then all the democrats will be save while many of us are dying..
There is a good argument to be made that the bioweapon they released mutated into a less lethal form fairly quickly once it was ‘in the wild’.
The mask mandates were put in place on the assumption that the virus was deadly using ‘best information available at the time’ — and the hysterical mindset of ‘muh we’ve got to do something!! — and they failed any evidence-based practice standard, medical standard, and logical reasoning even at that point.
The one thing they quickly understood it to be was a symbol — of the pandemic, of fear, of compliance, of conformity, of state power, and of political narrative-pushing (and leftists clearly understand it as a method for communistic rules-enforcement aggression).
Now we have these potential risks from vaccine failing to be weighed against the diminishing potential risks from CCP virus infection.
One can certainly consider developing them a good idea in the face of an unknown biological weapon — but deploying them, particularly after we’ve learned better methods for assessing and addressing the problem? That’s a whole other question!
It’s even more poignant given the contrast between attempting to rush forced novel retroviral RNA virus-like nano-tech vs. the freakout over HCQ as ‘untested’, since HCQ had a 50-year safety record and had been handed out like candy in Africa by the CDC itself for all those years.
Given that the primary lethal factor of the virus involves its provoking immune system reactivity from currently unknown direct causes, distribution of a vaccine that mimics a portion of the virus seems inherently HIGH RISK.
The vaccine basically introduces a ‘virus-like’ artificially-created biomechanism that invades some of your cells, takes them over like the virus, and then starts producing copies of the ‘spike’ portion of the virus instead of the entire virus — then the spikes go attach to and clog up all the spike receptors that the virus uses to get inside cells. That method of action, the biomechanism, and the ‘lipid coating’ it’s sort of ‘wrapped in’ to prolong its presence inside your body are all untested, short of the emergency use authorization studies for emergency approval.
The biomechanism has unknown effects as it is kind of like a virus itself — it keeps going pumping out copies of those proteins until the cell that it hijacked dies.
The method of action has been attempted unsuccessfully for 15 years or so...
And the ‘lipid coating’ portion is commonly used for drugs that are ingested, but never before used for injected drugs.
It’s a disaster in the making, especially if we get it forced on people with the same mindless bureaucratic brutish methods with which masks were.
This. Let every Dem take it. We might see a plague level die off of them.
Never thought I'd be in favor of genocide but here we are
Anybody who wants it can have it. Same as any other vaccine, if they get it it shouldn't matter if we don't unless it doesn't actually work in which case why did they take it?