I think that's likely. They will probably try to throw up every procedural barrier they can come up with (ie must go through lower courts first) because otherwise they have to make a monumental decision to either ignore the plain language of the constitution or to overturn an election the media has spent weeks propagandizing the general public about, while simultaneously lying about the "lack of evidence" about what's really going on with the election. It's a dangerous position to be in to rule either way on this case. Half of scotus is incentivized to preserve constitutional order, but all of scotus now has to worry about what happens when they overturn 4 states elections and the left goes wild.
They had better uphold their damned Oath of Office and perform their basic job function. I don't care if they have to live in a bunker for the rest of their lives.
I think that's likely. They will probably try to throw up every procedural barrier they can come up with (ie must go through lower courts first) because otherwise they have to make a monumental decision to either ignore the plain language of the constitution or to overturn an election the media has spent weeks propagandizing the general public about, while simultaneously lying about the "lack of evidence" about what's really going on with the election. It's a dangerous position to be in to rule either way on this case. Half of scotus is incentivized to preserve constitutional order, but all of scotus now has to worry about what happens when they overturn 4 states elections and the left goes wild.
They are not overturning the election. They are overturning the FRAUD to PRESERVE the election.
They had better uphold their damned Oath of Office and perform their basic job function. I don't care if they have to live in a bunker for the rest of their lives.