8161
Comments (285)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
Tacsol5 3 points ago +4 / -1

Dude, Barr was not in a position to do shit at that time. But you know who was? Mueller. He was acting head of the fbi during Waco AND Ruby ridge.

4
sun_wolf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interesting. I hadn’t looked into the Barr connection to Ruby Ridge. Sounds like people might be playing fast and loose to make him sound like mastermind behind the whole thing? They seem to do a similar thing to try to tie Barr’s dad to Epstein because they worked at the same college, even though they were separated by a few years.

Not saying people aren’t allowed to criticize Barr, but manipulating facts or omitting key details to do it isn’t really legitimate.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

I seem to recall barr working on the defence for the fbi.

0
Tacsol5 0 points ago +1 / -1

Maybe so, but is a defense lawyer supposed to walk away from their client if they think they're guilty? I've never heard of such a thing. They're just supposed to try and get them off or in the least amount of trouble possible. That's their job. I mean, someone was charles mansons defense lawyer too at some point. 🤷‍♂️

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Manson was not murdering at the goverments request.i seem to rember some states I worked in lawyers had different requirements if the belived there client was guilty.

0
mostooge 0 points ago +1 / -1

All fruit from the same rotten tree. Barr was the attorney that covered their asses though