But what if there was no Texas case?
I'm wondering what made them toss the previous case. I hope the Texas move made them choose that option and not their mindset
The only reason I am not too concerned, is there were no dissenters and no explanation. With half the country pissed off, I would think there would be more information provided. Not good news, but not terrible.
The TX vs PA case?
Nope Pa Leg Vs Pa...
I could be wrong, someone is saying Kellys suit is seperate?
No
If the case is redundant, then it will be another big zero
I hope that's their reasoning
But what if there was no Texas case? I'm wondering what made them toss the previous case. I hope the Texas move made them choose that option and not their mindset
Just denies the certification rejection. The fight can still be brought by Rudy to contest it.
It's not good, but the whole thing doesn't hinge on this case. But it's incredibly concerning.
The only reason I am not too concerned, is there were no dissenters and no explanation. With half the country pissed off, I would think there would be more information provided. Not good news, but not terrible.
Also, this isn’t the POTUS lawyers right? Doesn’t his team still have one pending?
I think the Texas case is the one to fix the fraud
ouch
without noted dissent...wtf
What does it mean that they didn't toss the case?
does anyone know the reason for it being denied?
It was moot. basically same argument as TX. and TX includes MI, WI and GA as well. So yeah. This makes sense.
It was a big ask.
Lol!
It's not over.
PA is a battle lost. It's not the entire war.
Without PA, we ain’t going anywhere.
Of course. Gettysburg.
Lock and load?