1880
posted ago by 6ased ago by 6ased +1880 / -0

It doesn't look like SCOTUS dismissed the PA case. They only denied a request for preliminary injunction. The case still looks active and pending.

Comments (21)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
TowerLake 4 points ago +4 / -0

What an emergency injunction is

This is a request to for the court to something necessary without the case being heard yet.

For example,

If you were denied asylum by a judge, and your deportation is in a week.

You can appeal your case decision to an appellate judge, but the appellate judge can only schedule your hearing in a month

You would request an emergency injunction on a stay on your deportations, so that you can still be here in a month to argue your case

Judge approves emergency injunction for this reason.

This is not an approval or denial of asylum case.

The person still needs to argue his case and then the appellate judge would approve or deny.

On the contrary, if your deportation was actually 2 months from now, the appeal judge would deny it because it is irrelevant

This is what happened in this case

PA GOP requested an emergency injunction that SCOTUS decertified election, but SCOTUS ruled that certification is irrelevant.

PA Case continues, and they still have to argue thier case to the SCOTUS if scotus takes it on.

4
Thor610 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is SCOTUS saying PA certification of the election is 'irrelevant'? Or irrelevant to the court?

1
TowerLake 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the first one.

Im not actually a lawyer, so I dont know the finer details but from what I understand, Theres something strange going on.

https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTuYt7R/massive-disinformation-effort-on/

Jenna Ellis's comments are being contradicted by Ted Cruz's