1880
It doesn't look like SCOTUS dismissed the PA case. They only denied a request for preliminary injunction. The case still looks active and pending.
posted ago by 6ased ago by 6ased +1880 / -0

It doesn't look like SCOTUS dismissed the PA case. They only denied a request for preliminary injunction. The case still looks active and pending.

21 comments
21 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (21)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 3 ▼
– Kraznaya 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is true. It made no sense to grant the motion to PA, as that would have complicated the TX case which sought very similar relief from PA/MI/WI/GA.

SCOTUS does what it wants so it probably wouldn't have been as big of a deal for them, but it would have given the defense an argument that they shouldn't grant a 4-state injunction since they have already granted a very similar if not identical injunction to one of those four.

This was a good move by SCOTUS.

permalink save report block reply