635 SCOTUS DENIED PA GOP EXPLANATION: An injunctive relief is ONLY granted if there are no other legal options available. Certification is only the beginning of the litigation process. So this decision was expected and is meaningless. Texas suit is the game changer. THIS IS NOT A DOOMER RULING. posted 77 days ago by JohnBarron +635 / -0 Repost courtesy of u/-howitzer- Repost courtesy of u/-howitzer- 7 comments share 7 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (7) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 8 ▼ – deleted 8 points 77 days ago +8 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – Joesf23 3 points 77 days ago +3 / -0 Fuck Im so confused. Does the texas case apply to all the states where fuckery occured, and therefore the scotus would be overseeing a multiple state issue vs PA only issue? permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 77 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – TowerLake 2 points 77 days ago +2 / -0 What this actually means SCOTUS denied PA GOP’s emergency injunction to decertify election results before SCOTUS hears the case. The case will still go on without it. What an emergency injunction is This is a request to for the court to something necessary without the case being heard yet. For example, If you were denied asylum by a judge, and your deportation is in a week. You can appeal your case decision to an appellate judge, but the appellate judge can only schedule your hearing in a month You would request an emergency injunction on a stay on your deportations, so that you can still be here in a month to argue your case Judge approves emergency injunction for this reason. This is not an approval or denial of asylum case. The person still needs to argue his case and then the appellate judge would approve or deny. On the contrary, if your deportation was actually 2 months from now, the appeal judge would deny the emergency injunction because it is irrelevant This is what happened in this case PA GOP requested an emergency injunction that SCOTUS decertified election results, but SCOTUS ruled that certification is irrelevant. PA Case continues, and they still have to argue thier case to the SCOTUS if scotus takes it on. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Joesf23 2 points 77 days ago +2 / -0 Thank you for this! Post this at the top of the main page so the law idiots like me dont panic lol permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – TXMagaMom 2 points 77 days ago +2 / -0 Keep the faith. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 77 days ago +1 / -0
Fuck Im so confused. Does the texas case apply to all the states where fuckery occured, and therefore the scotus would be overseeing a multiple state issue vs PA only issue?
What this actually means
SCOTUS denied PA GOP’s emergency injunction to decertify election results before SCOTUS hears the case. The case will still go on without it.
What an emergency injunction is
This is a request to for the court to something necessary without the case being heard yet.
For example,
If you were denied asylum by a judge, and your deportation is in a week.
You can appeal your case decision to an appellate judge, but the appellate judge can only schedule your hearing in a month
You would request an emergency injunction on a stay on your deportations, so that you can still be here in a month to argue your case
Judge approves emergency injunction for this reason.
This is not an approval or denial of asylum case. The person still needs to argue his case and then the appellate judge would approve or deny.
On the contrary, if your deportation was actually 2 months from now, the appeal judge would deny the emergency injunction because it is irrelevant
This is what happened in this case
PA GOP requested an emergency injunction that SCOTUS decertified election results, but SCOTUS ruled that certification is irrelevant.
PA Case continues, and they still have to argue thier case to the SCOTUS if scotus takes it on.
Thank you for this! Post this at the top of the main page so the law idiots like me dont panic lol
Keep the faith.