My fiance is in Medschool - they've totally cucked it. Most residency programs now ask any white person about their "White Privilege" at the interview. Also, the New England Medical Journal, which is one of the foremost medical journals, put an anti-Trump message in its journal to the entire medical establishment. It's horrid what's going on there.
Hm, interesting. I didn’t know so many young people aspire to be a two faced sniveling, turd burgling, smegma gulping, little weasel rat fink who says diametrically opposed opinions on any given topic every other sentence. Curious.
Good choice honestly. I was gonna do med school, ended up doing business admin with an emphasis in mis. Ended getting a good job without accruing 4 years of debt from ridiculous grad school tuition prices. No regrets
TLDR, SCOTUS is not worried about any action that the state of PA may take pertaining to the election.
TY
Injunctive relief, also known as an injunction, is a remedy which restrains a party from doing certain acts or requires a party to act in a certain way. It is generally only available when there is no other remedy at law and irreparable harm will result if the relief is not granted. The purpose of this form of relief is to prevent future wrong. Such orders, when issued before a judgement, are known as preliminary injunctions that can be punished as contempt if not obeyed. Due to its coercive force, a grant of injunctive relief is subject to immediate review by an appellate court. The standard for review is an abuse of discretion. As such, an injunctive relief will be overturned if the appellate court finds that the trial court issued the relief based on an misapplication of the law or an erroneous factual finding.
Injunctive relief is generally only granted in extreme circumstances. The party seeking a preliminary injunctive relief must demonstrate: (1) irreparable injury in the absence of such an order; (2) that the threatened injury to the moving party outweighs the harm to the opposing party resulting from the order; (3) that the injunction is not adverse to public interest; and (4) that the moving party has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. In considering these factors, courts have been described to apply a "sliding scale" approach where the more likely a movant will succeed on the merits, the less irreparable harm (to the movant) needs to be shown in granting the injunction. There is no mathematical means of balancing these factors, therefore, the "sliding scale" approach is based on a court's intuitive judgement. It is worth noting that courts will not find irreparable harm where the damages sustained are calculable. New York has held that in such situations, monetary damages serve as an adequate remedy.
Under the Federal scheme, Rule 65 codifies the requirements for injunctive relief.
I respectfully disagree with Levin. They know what they're reporting is wrong and they're doing it anyway.
Maybe if it was fucktards like CNN, but even the Wall Street Journal reported it as if the whole thing was denied. WSJ doesn't make mistakes like that. Shit's on purpose.
Yeah it's been said before, but these aren't mistakes. It's malicious and seditious. They're trying to increase shock value for when Trump is sworn in.
So this means it's time to get in the streets!! All the big talk on here and nobody ever does ANYTHING!!! .... Y'all act like everything is fine and everything is part of the plan so you don't have to actually do anything!!... IT'S NOT!!!! ... At this point in time we're losing!!!! .... We can NOT accept that!!! ... It's now or never!! .... We can not allow Biden to fucking take office!!!! Something has to be done!!!
Exactly, SCOTUS's remedy would be to inform Congress to not accept the electors from these States or to only accept them for a given candidate if it's proven the other candidate won according to the legal process established (unless overridden by the Legislature, which is untested ground, AFAIK).
PA certifying their election results means nothing, SCOTUS will just overrule the certification if the time comes.
From what I can tell, this is just procedural. The case is still active. Only the petition for injunctive relief was denied. Kelly can now file for cert to have the case docketed, and he may still do that. Or it could be pointless now since Texas has filed what may be a stronger suit in the long run. We may find out as soon as Thursday.
They know exactly what they're doing, they're not stupid. Does nobody around here anymore remember cracking the 4am narrative code? They're all complicit in treason with their alphabet handlers. Entire bloodlines must be cut
I for one am far too stupid. I was gonna go into law but after this election medical looks promising
My fiance is in Medschool - they've totally cucked it. Most residency programs now ask any white person about their "White Privilege" at the interview. Also, the New England Medical Journal, which is one of the foremost medical journals, put an anti-Trump message in its journal to the entire medical establishment. It's horrid what's going on there.
One more reason to infiltrate it and dispense red pills as a pharmacist.
We need more people who think like you. Say a few million?
LinkedIn homepage has an article up about the Fauci effect at med schools. Apparently, applicants are pouring in to be just like him.
Hm, interesting. I didn’t know so many young people aspire to be a two faced sniveling, turd burgling, smegma gulping, little weasel rat fink who says diametrically opposed opinions on any given topic every other sentence. Curious.
AMA was infested by commies long ago.
Peer reviewed journals have always published those authors who tow the line. This is nothing new.
That's cause they all take Chicom money.
LMFAO. Same here. I was gonna do law, but I'm just doing Business Admin rn lmfao
Good choice honestly. I was gonna do med school, ended up doing business admin with an emphasis in mis. Ended getting a good job without accruing 4 years of debt from ridiculous grad school tuition prices. No regrets
That whole fake a pandemic and have a vaccine ready bullshit is where the money is. You should do that for a career.
I'd sooner die.
Bite your tongue! Thats a horrible idea, did not we just spend a year learning the wonderful effect of greed on humanity
Get a finance or a mathematics degrees. They're multifunctional.
Math gives me cancer but business shit gives me c o o l :)
chromosomes don't matter. Medicine is witchcraft. Change my mind
TLDR, SCOTUS is not worried about any action that the state of PA may take pertaining to the election.
TY
Injunctive relief, also known as an injunction, is a remedy which restrains a party from doing certain acts or requires a party to act in a certain way. It is generally only available when there is no other remedy at law and irreparable harm will result if the relief is not granted. The purpose of this form of relief is to prevent future wrong. Such orders, when issued before a judgement, are known as preliminary injunctions that can be punished as contempt if not obeyed. Due to its coercive force, a grant of injunctive relief is subject to immediate review by an appellate court. The standard for review is an abuse of discretion. As such, an injunctive relief will be overturned if the appellate court finds that the trial court issued the relief based on an misapplication of the law or an erroneous factual finding.
Injunctive relief is generally only granted in extreme circumstances. The party seeking a preliminary injunctive relief must demonstrate: (1) irreparable injury in the absence of such an order; (2) that the threatened injury to the moving party outweighs the harm to the opposing party resulting from the order; (3) that the injunction is not adverse to public interest; and (4) that the moving party has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. In considering these factors, courts have been described to apply a "sliding scale" approach where the more likely a movant will succeed on the merits, the less irreparable harm (to the movant) needs to be shown in granting the injunction. There is no mathematical means of balancing these factors, therefore, the "sliding scale" approach is based on a court's intuitive judgement. It is worth noting that courts will not find irreparable harm where the damages sustained are calculable. New York has held that in such situations, monetary damages serve as an adequate remedy.
Under the Federal scheme, Rule 65 codifies the requirements for injunctive relief.
Thanks for breakdown.
You are very welcome.
Thanks kindly!
Post Title: "Injunction Junction, What's Your Function?"
Thank you for this explanation; it was very helpful.
You are very welcome.
Then what is next and when?
Join the Texas and other states SCOTUS case on the docket.
I respectfully disagree with Levin. They know what they're reporting is wrong and they're doing it anyway.
Maybe if it was fucktards like CNN, but even the Wall Street Journal reported it as if the whole thing was denied. WSJ doesn't make mistakes like that. Shit's on purpose.
Yeah it's been said before, but these aren't mistakes. It's malicious and seditious. They're trying to increase shock value for when Trump is sworn in.
Just like when they called Biden President-elect.
Or don't dispute the title "office of the president elect" on all his podiums.
The Wall Street Journal is RINO. After decades of reading it, I quit.
They didn't like Reagan, and they resent Trump.
Why not both? Real journalism is very rare in this day and age, the MSM certainly doesn't practice it.
So this means it's time to get in the streets!! All the big talk on here and nobody ever does ANYTHING!!! .... Y'all act like everything is fine and everything is part of the plan so you don't have to actually do anything!!... IT'S NOT!!!! ... At this point in time we're losing!!!! .... We can NOT accept that!!! ... It's now or never!! .... We can not allow Biden to fucking take office!!!! Something has to be done!!!
What this actually means
SCOTUS denied PA GOP’s emergency injunction to decertify election results before SCOTUS hears the case. The case will still go on without it.
What an emergency injunction is
This is a request to for the court to something necessary without the case being heard yet.
For example,
If you were denied asylum by a judge, and your deportation is in a week.
You can appeal your case decision to an appellate judge, but the appellate judge can only schedule your hearing in a month
You would request an emergency injunction on a stay on your deportations, so that you can still be here in a month to argue your case
Judge approves emergency injunction for this reason.
This is not an approval or denial of asylum case. The person still needs to argue his case and then the appellate judge would approve or deny.
On the contrary, if your deportation was actually 2 months from now, the appeal judge would deny it because it is irrelevant
This is what happened in this case
PA GOP requested an emergency injunction that SCOTUS decertified election results, but SCOTUS ruled that certification is irrelevant.
PA Case continues, and they still have to argue thier case to the SCOTUS if scotus takes it on.
Exactly, SCOTUS's remedy would be to inform Congress to not accept the electors from these States or to only accept them for a given candidate if it's proven the other candidate won according to the legal process established (unless overridden by the Legislature, which is untested ground, AFAIK).
PA certifying their election results means nothing, SCOTUS will just overrule the certification if the time comes.
This exact one.
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1336451735150350336
According to Jenna Ellis (Trump lawyer), what I said earlier is correct. I still can’t seem to find the actual case number though.
From what I can tell, this is just procedural. The case is still active. Only the petition for injunctive relief was denied. Kelly can now file for cert to have the case docketed, and he may still do that. Or it could be pointless now since Texas has filed what may be a stronger suit in the long run. We may find out as soon as Thursday.
Yes you are right.
There should be another PA case number, but I’m having difficulty finding it by searching for it on my phone.
Either that or it has not been docketed yet.
I did skim through the application and it is indeed a request for an emergency injunction.
I know that there is an actual case, not an injunction.
Case is very solid too.
If I find it on SCOTUS website, I’ll update this.
More accurate description.
The media is nothing but activists for the most part, they are playing their role in the coup till something massive comes along.
Motion Granted
They know exactly what they're doing. What they don't realize is a Tokyo Rose won't work when we're already got the artillery loaded.
They know exactly what they're doing, they're not stupid. Does nobody around here anymore remember cracking the 4am narrative code? They're all complicit in treason with their alphabet handlers. Entire bloodlines must be cut
Why not both?
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIvQJ/chill-pedes-we-are-good-scotus-d/
I’m not patient enough for law school. I’ll trust you pedes.
Yeah, I gather the same.
Well what's injunctive relief? What's it mean? This is still a loss, isn't it?
Not really. Just means SCOTUS doesn't care about safe harbor.
The dopes on r/politics are having a feeding frenzy over this. They think the case was kicked and are too stupid to realize what really happened.
Then what is going to happen next from here?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/163088/20201208152905478_Motion%20to%20Submit%20Amicus%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Application%20for%20Injunction.pdf
This is probably why it was denied?
What then is next and when?
I'm pretty much functionally retarded and even I saw this. Unfortunately, anybody who watches the MSM is even more retardeder than I.
These treasonous news need to be charlie hebdoed!!!
No. Theyre just so arrogant that they actually think its about them! Sad dolly hangarounds at the clubhouse behave better!
Our media is literally so retarded. You don't need a law degree to understand basic terms like what injunctive relief is.
Well hot Damn!
Ivan has been on our side this whole time so he probably just fell for fake news.
https://youtu.be/kr2wvP2eZ70
Why would we expect them to know anything, or report truthfully, for the first time in their lives?! Of course there is spin going on, this is war!
Brand new doomfagging shill account that just posts this. Deported.
Deport the idiot.