I think he was. I haven't been in the car at the right time for his radio show most of this month, but the one time I was, it was a breath of fresh air in terms of clarity and lack of bluster, but still lots of hope and assurance that they will fight at the SC.
He formulated the multi-pronged legal assault on the criminal conspirators in the offending states.
He used several axis of attack - culminating with a States right case at SCOTUS. Striking the very heart of what our Constitution is (or is not if you read the brief).
Even 8:4 is an astounding record when considering where he is presenting arguments. I would probably swallow my tongue in the first couple sentences if I was standing before SCOTUS trying to make an argument
Isn’t Jay 12-0 or something like that in SCOTUS?
But Rudy is more than 12-0 against organized crime
So you’re saying we have a team that’s 24-0? I like our odds!
I wonder if Sekulow doesn't have his hand in this. I've been wondering where he's been
i'm sure he was always working behind the scenes. everyone has a part. cant wait for the smackdown
I think he was. I haven't been in the car at the right time for his radio show most of this month, but the one time I was, it was a breath of fresh air in terms of clarity and lack of bluster, but still lots of hope and assurance that they will fight at the SC.
He uploads his shows as podcasts if you want to listen to it FYI
Jay is the Legal Team's General
He formulated the multi-pronged legal assault on the criminal conspirators in the offending states.
He used several axis of attack - culminating with a States right case at SCOTUS. Striking the very heart of what our Constitution is (or is not if you read the brief).
This one is his Normandy.
Looks like it is 8-4 according to the summary of his SCOTUS cases on Wikipedia.
This one seems like a slam dunk if they follow the constitution.
Even 8:4 is an astounding record when considering where he is presenting arguments. I would probably swallow my tongue in the first couple sentences if I was standing before SCOTUS trying to make an argument
I'd probably pass out.