This case is limited in scope, only dealing with how each state addressed constitutional issues. It does not include massive fraud by Democratic operatives (such as dead people voting, under-aged voting, out of state voting, non-citizen voting, etc.) as well as tampering with the vote count via Dominion machines. There is a lot of solid evidence for these things and many more illegal votes involved. Is there any way they will be able to more information to support the case?
Actually it does include those things. And yes, since SCOTUS has original jurisdiction here, if they believe it helpful or necessary they can finally have their evidentiary hearings. :)
This case is limited in scope, only dealing with how each state addressed constitutional issues. It does not include massive fraud by Democratic operatives (such as dead people voting, under-aged voting, out of state voting, non-citizen voting, etc.) as well as tampering with the vote count via Dominion machines. There is a lot of solid evidence for these things and many more illegal votes involved. Is there any way they will be able to more information to support the case?
Actually it does include those things. And yes, since SCOTUS has original jurisdiction here, if they believe it helpful or necessary they can finally have their evidentiary hearings. :)
BINGO
Again, whoever wrote this was a strategic genius and well versed in Constitutional Law and SCOTUS proceedings.
My guess is Jay, Zodiac, Pam, Paxton and probably a few others had a hand in its crafting.