5 () 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑 posted 130 days ago by Rollen 130 days ago by Rollen +8 / -3 13 comments share 13 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (13) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 5 ▼ – sully 5 points 130 days ago +5 / -0 Because they took the Texas case, rendering the PA case redundant because PA is included in the Texas case. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Carbum 3 points 130 days ago +3 / -0 Basically Texas case is the same thing permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – DukemNukem1 2 points 130 days ago +2 / -0 https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/?sort=new permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – Sandman441 2 points 130 days ago +2 / -0 Basically this and the Texas case are the same lawsuit, so why try 2 cases, the texas one is bigger. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Bundleshee 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 My understanding is that it was similar to the texas case but that case affected more states. It's like killing 6 birds with 1 stone. permalink parent save report block reply
Because they took the Texas case, rendering the PA case redundant because PA is included in the Texas case.
Basically Texas case is the same thing
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/?sort=new
Basically this and the Texas case are the same lawsuit, so why try 2 cases, the texas one is bigger.
My understanding is that it was similar to the texas case but that case affected more states. It's like killing 6 birds with 1 stone.