1041
Comments (34)
sorted by:
24
DblFistinPiston 24 points ago +24 / -0

I don't like math, I haven't since my mom told me my favorite uncle died in a math lab explosion.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
USMCMAGA 11 points ago +12 / -1

And for you spelling challenged folks...

4
Dirk_Diggler 4 points ago +4 / -0

Meh. As weird as it sounds, certain typos are strangely "comforting", to me atleast. It reminds me there is a human on the other end, and that sites like the TD aren't just some procedurally generated interaction by an AI. But maybe I am just a few fries short of a value meal.

3
RiffFantastic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very smart AI to put subtle mistakes in to make you believe.

2
Dirk_Diggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, now I have given the AI an algorithm to make it more "believable." Is that you GLaDOS?

3
Useful_Vidiots 3 points ago +5 / -2

I know. Proofing takes fucking seconds. The titles. The memes. The abortions that could have been avoided.

7
Kiki123 7 points ago +7 / -0

The powerball comment 😂

6
Shalomtoyou 6 points ago +6 / -0

Whoa, whoa whoa! WHOOOOOA NELLY!

The number there you put is a hundred quadrillion, not a quadrillion.

You meant to do 1,000,000,000,000,000.

I expect better math literacy!

4
Wahzuhbee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you for this! I was cringing thinking nobody was going to point that out.

2
MakeAmericaLegendary 2 points ago +2 / -0

I only came to the comments to see if someone would mention it.

1
calmestchaos 1 point ago +1 / -0

true, though if the to the 4th power argument is true (per state and there were 4 states), then it would go from 15 zeroes to 60.

1,000,000,000,000,000^4 = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

1
Shalomtoyou 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if that number has a name outside of scientific notation.

1
calmestchaos 1 point ago +1 / -0

Novemdecillion (19) in short scale, Decillion (10) in long scale

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers

5
acasper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Match, had me confused for a second.

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

rite? For a second I thought it was about a dating site...

3
acasper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just been MAGA. Match problems solved

4
rusty_spittoon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Weird, thats the same odds of the FBI looking into it....

4
Staatssicherheit 4 points ago +4 / -0

How did he calculate those odds is the more important question. No one is explaining that part. These appeals to authority arguments ring very hollow unless the expert shows how he is correct.

1
NeoSprtacus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. Especially since the pretense of the biden swing is with absentee ballots. Probably set an equal weight between DJT/pedobiden when it doesn't exist

4
Mooma 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chances of the USA surviving under biden are even lower.

3
Legalvotesonly1 3 points ago +3 / -0

To be technical it was the quadrillion to the 4th power. An insane number

3
NeoSprtacus 3 points ago +3 / -0

He actually said a single state probability was 1quad, and all four is 1quad^4.

So 1000000000000000 0000000000000 0000000000000 0000000000000

1
goodatlife123 1 point ago +1 / -0

came here looking for this information.. thanks

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
SuperDuty4x4 4 points ago +4 / -0

You say sarc, but that was pretty much the Fox headline. "Not statistically impossible, but statistically improbable". And the left has their head so far in the...sand...they still think Fox is conservative.

2
Testosteroneape2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

more chance of being killed by a falling piano while riding a unicycle with a monkey on your back.

1
RyanUpCreek 1 point ago +1 / -0

My dog had a better chance at getting elected than Joe Biden according to those odds.

1
CaptainButthurt 1 point ago +1 / -0

This assumes leftists know math...

1
TAIWANNUMBERONE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Powerball is only impossible if you're from the same state.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
goodatlife123 1 point ago +1 / -0

what was all that one in a quadrillion talk?