A lot of it is based on Rudy's and Matt's work. As well as the numerous brave private citizens who provided sworn statements. Paxton had the strength of conviction to lead on this issue. He is a hero.
I think the two are inseparable. If all of these states hadn't illegally changed all of their mail in procedures at the last moment, we wouldn't have seen 178,384 absentee ballots that were unable to match to a registered voter (Page 28, Bullet 97).
Throwing in the fraud evidence doesn’t hurt, but it shouldn’t, as a legal matter, be needed.
If non-legislature actors changed election law, they violated the Electors Clause. If such violation affected a sufficient number of ballots (determined without consideration to any fraud), the election is FUBAR.
A lot of it is based on Rudy's and Matt's work. As well as the numerous brave private citizens who provided sworn statements. Paxton had the strength of conviction to lead on this issue. He is a hero.
It’s really based on con law arguments. They pepper in a few facts re fraud, but those are superfluous to the legal issues.
I think the two are inseparable. If all of these states hadn't illegally changed all of their mail in procedures at the last moment, we wouldn't have seen 178,384 absentee ballots that were unable to match to a registered voter (Page 28, Bullet 97).
Throwing in the fraud evidence doesn’t hurt, but it shouldn’t, as a legal matter, be needed.
If non-legislature actors changed election law, they violated the Electors Clause. If such violation affected a sufficient number of ballots (determined without consideration to any fraud), the election is FUBAR.