6 () posted 130 days ago by magachudd 130 days ago by magachudd +7 / -1 15 comments share 15 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (15) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 5 ▼ – excellente_magnifico 5 points 130 days ago +5 / -0 Earlier post: https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/ permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – magachudd [S] 2 points 130 days ago +2 / -0 Thank you. Could not find. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – killerbunny88 4 points 130 days ago +5 / -1 Because the SC is hearing the Texas case that includes PA and 3 other states. It would be redundant to see both cases, so they chose the bigger one that had the most merit. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – magachudd [S] 2 points 130 days ago +2 / -0 Thanks!! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Leadforpeds 3 points 130 days ago +3 / -0 Incorrect. He denied the relief injunction, not the case. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – marsajane1949 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 Exactly!! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Magapat 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/ permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Non_Fren_Bopper_3000 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/ permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – marsajane1949 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 NO HE DIDN"T STOP POSTING THIS BS!!! He DENIED AN INJUNCTION ASKED FOR LATTER ON, NOT THE CASE!!!! permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – glasses2020 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 Surprising nobody. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – MrFrog3D 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 Your account is old, but you have so few posts. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Steven4385 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 They denied immediate injunctive relief in a "pending case" permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – TheBasedZodiac 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 Denies immediate injunction =|= denies CASE permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – sustainable_saltmine 1 point 130 days ago +1 / -0 Old news. Ancient history permalink save report block reply
Earlier post: https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/
Thank you. Could not find.
Because the SC is hearing the Texas case that includes PA and 3 other states. It would be redundant to see both cases, so they chose the bigger one that had the most merit.
Thanks!!
Incorrect. He denied the relief injunction, not the case.
Exactly!!
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTsIe2a/scotus-denied-pa-gop-explanation/
NO HE DIDN"T STOP POSTING THIS BS!!! He DENIED AN INJUNCTION ASKED FOR LATTER ON, NOT THE CASE!!!!
Surprising nobody.
Your account is old, but you have so few posts.
They denied immediate injunctive relief in a "pending case"
Denies immediate injunction =|= denies CASE
Old news. Ancient history