Most Supreme Court cases aren't partisan in nature, though. Certainly not as hyper partisan as this one. This case would absolutely see a split, no different than Bush v Gore. Let's just hope there's not a Judas on the bench.
The PA lawsuit hasn’t been thrown out. The SC denied emergency injunctive relief, they didn’t throw the whole case away. The case itself is still pending.
I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.
I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you.
So in this situation with SCOTUS, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification if the outcome calls for it, making the original certification null and void anyways. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.
emergency injunction is the equivalent of expedite shipping. They are trying to move the case ahead of any queue in order to get a prompt outcome. That's all.
"Emergency" seems to be an add-on, but injunctive relief would be like a temporary restraining order.
If you were digging a hole on my property, I could probably get a TRO to stop you, and then we could go into court and argue about whose property it is, and whether you have any right to dig on it.
SCOTUS can still overrule the certification. They likely found this request to be irrelevant (since they can overrule the certification anyways). I can’t say for certain but i’d assume this may be why it was denied. The case is still active.
Glowing means like undercover FBI or other agency trying infiltrate this site to gaslight people to talk about doing illegal things ie "we should all meet on Congress steps and just start shooting" or stuff along those lines. It is derived from 4chan which would call other anons "glow n***ers" when those types of comments were made. Glowing because they are so obvious and stick out.
I'm not scared of any of them bitches!!! And neither should any of you!!! They breath the same air as me!!! I've been fighting black people and dumb fuck white people all my life!! They all bleed!!!! .... I only hope I have a chance to even the score!! I got jumped by I don't know how many, they knocked my tooth out but never knocked me down!! I'm 6'4" and roughly 280 now... I've been fighting all my life... Put just 2 of them little bitches in front of me and not TEN and I'll win the fucking fight!!!! ... But I will need the back up of others like me willing to defend our elderly, or businesses and our livelihoods!!! If I'm out there all alone AGAIN then even i will start to turn on you people!!! Cowardice NEVER prospers!!! Bring it the fuck on!!!
They are being a bunch of fucking pussies. If BLM and Antifa start rioting then that provides us an excellent excuse for rounding them up by the tens of thousands and throwing them behind bars.
Lol, when is any decision 9-0?
Most Supreme Court cases aren't partisan in nature, though. Certainly not as hyper partisan as this one. This case would absolutely see a split, no different than Bush v Gore. Let's just hope there's not a Judas on the bench.
A lot of the obscure banal ones are
When they want a pay raise
The PA lawsuit hasn’t been thrown out. The SC denied emergency injunctive relief, they didn’t throw the whole case away. The case itself is still pending.
What is emergency injunctive relief in layman’s terms and why does xi-edit think it’s a big win for the Left?
I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.
I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation with SCOTUS, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification if the outcome calls for it, making the original certification null and void anyways. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.
emergency injunction is the equivalent of expedite shipping. They are trying to move the case ahead of any queue in order to get a prompt outcome. That's all.
I don't know, but if it lasts more than 4 hours you should probably consult your physician
"Emergency" seems to be an add-on, but injunctive relief would be like a temporary restraining order.
If you were digging a hole on my property, I could probably get a TRO to stop you, and then we could go into court and argue about whose property it is, and whether you have any right to dig on it.
They're allowing them to certify aren't they?? Wasn't that the main Crux of the lawsuit??
SCOTUS can still overrule the certification. They likely found this request to be irrelevant (since they can overrule the certification anyways). I can’t say for certain but i’d assume this may be why it was denied. The case is still active.
Can you type this more clearly? I cant follow anything you wrote; it seems detached from reality.
How's Cussing at people anonymously on the internet going?
You also seem to not be doing anything.
You are glowing...
What does glowing mean?? I'm a 40 year old parent I don't know cpu code!! Lol ... I had a pager growing up and thought I was the shit
Im same age as you. I think its opposite of doomer.
Glowing means like undercover FBI or other agency trying infiltrate this site to gaslight people to talk about doing illegal things ie "we should all meet on Congress steps and just start shooting" or stuff along those lines. It is derived from 4chan which would call other anons "glow n***ers" when those types of comments were made. Glowing because they are so obvious and stick out.
I'm not scared of any of them bitches!!! And neither should any of you!!! They breath the same air as me!!! I've been fighting black people and dumb fuck white people all my life!! They all bleed!!!! .... I only hope I have a chance to even the score!! I got jumped by I don't know how many, they knocked my tooth out but never knocked me down!! I'm 6'4" and roughly 280 now... I've been fighting all my life... Put just 2 of them little bitches in front of me and not TEN and I'll win the fucking fight!!!! ... But I will need the back up of others like me willing to defend our elderly, or businesses and our livelihoods!!! If I'm out there all alone AGAIN then even i will start to turn on you people!!! Cowardice NEVER prospers!!! Bring it the fuck on!!!
They are being a bunch of fucking pussies. If BLM and Antifa start rioting then that provides us an excellent excuse for rounding them up by the tens of thousands and throwing them behind bars.