The PA lawsuit hasn’t been thrown out. The SC denied emergency injunctive relief, they didn’t throw the whole case away. The case itself is still pending.
I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.
I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you.
So in this situation with SCOTUS, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification if the outcome calls for it, making the original certification null and void anyways. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.
emergency injunction is the equivalent of expedite shipping. They are trying to move the case ahead of any queue in order to get a prompt outcome. That's all.
"Emergency" seems to be an add-on, but injunctive relief would be like a temporary restraining order.
If you were digging a hole on my property, I could probably get a TRO to stop you, and then we could go into court and argue about whose property it is, and whether you have any right to dig on it.
SCOTUS can still overrule the certification. They likely found this request to be irrelevant (since they can overrule the certification anyways). I can’t say for certain but i’d assume this may be why it was denied. The case is still active.
We knew these cases were going to be thrown out with the lower courts so they can take them up to scotus but now we’re letting that discourage us. From what I hear, this TX case seems promising. Try to be optimistic.
I truly hope your right brother!!! ... Fear is the greatest motivator aside from love.... Let's hope the supreme court loves the constitution more than the fear the mob!!!
The PA lawsuit hasn’t been thrown out. The SC denied emergency injunctive relief, they didn’t throw the whole case away. The case itself is still pending.
What is emergency injunctive relief in layman’s terms and why does xi-edit think it’s a big win for the Left?
I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.
I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation with SCOTUS, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification if the outcome calls for it, making the original certification null and void anyways. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.
Thank you, your comment deserves a lot more upvotes!!!
We are all in this together!
Much love fren
A1 for effort and it works for me.
emergency injunction is the equivalent of expedite shipping. They are trying to move the case ahead of any queue in order to get a prompt outcome. That's all.
I don't know, but if it lasts more than 4 hours you should probably consult your physician
"Emergency" seems to be an add-on, but injunctive relief would be like a temporary restraining order.
If you were digging a hole on my property, I could probably get a TRO to stop you, and then we could go into court and argue about whose property it is, and whether you have any right to dig on it.
They're allowing them to certify aren't they?? Wasn't that the main Crux of the lawsuit??
SCOTUS can still overrule the certification. They likely found this request to be irrelevant (since they can overrule the certification anyways). I can’t say for certain but i’d assume this may be why it was denied. The case is still active.
We knew these cases were going to be thrown out with the lower courts so they can take them up to scotus but now we’re letting that discourage us. From what I hear, this TX case seems promising. Try to be optimistic.
I truly hope your right brother!!! ... Fear is the greatest motivator aside from love.... Let's hope the supreme court loves the constitution more than the fear the mob!!!