8068
Comments (590)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
868
sunnyingreenfield 868 points ago +872 / -4

Well hello Eric Ciaramella pg.37

646
Pandas4Trump 646 points ago +650 / -4

That's a name I haven't heard in a long... long... time. Did I ever tell you... your father fought in the meme wars?

526
GlacialSpeed 526 points ago +526 / -0

So glad we can utter the shitbag deepstate puppet's name here without any censoring.

Die reddit, you'll be forgotten soon.

295
Wexit-Delecto 295 points ago +296 / -1

Man, our time on reddit was fucked. Fuck that place. Fuck u/spez!

292
deleted 292 points ago +292 / -0
52
deleted 52 points ago +52 / -0
41
deleted 41 points ago +41 / -0
9
pmyourcovfefes 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ha I joined Reddit/TD in about June 2016 and didn’t understand why all the comments had fuck u/spez

How quickly I learned 😂

7
FedUpAndReady 7 points ago +7 / -0

Plebbit is cancer.

32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
31
prof_robinson 31 points ago +31 / -0

There should be a /reddit sub on TheDonald. Nothing but ass memes

21
PinochetsChopperRide 21 points ago +21 / -0

It’s in the works. I think they plan to roll that out after this election fiasco is over.

7
WildSauce 7 points ago +7 / -0

The mods posted a few weeks ago saying they were going to roll out more communities after the election. They don't want to do it right now because it would be a distraction.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
3
EvanGRogers 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're working on it

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
No_Malarkey_Joe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't forget about the tranny fluid

1
SchveebleSchvobbla 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol yea we all got warnings for upvoting it, threatened to ban our accounts. Still have that meme somewhere!

3
MrsMAGA9 3 points ago +3 / -0

I completely forgot about that...had to resort to playing the "sounds like" game. Like a certain Cadbury candy - Carmello.

68
deleted 68 points ago +68 / -0
52
Classicalliberal 52 points ago +52 / -0

I would give a testicle for this timeline

38
deleted 38 points ago +38 / -0
30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
2
gaijin_ronin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I very much enjoy my testicles. Would a sacrificial auntquifa or other leftist be accepted?

1
hiddenconservative 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's not pretend like the liberal men and some of their women didn't give all their testicles hoping for a Biden win. :P

4
3Terms 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would have to disagree with the timeline. Don Jr is inaugurated on 2029 after Seniors 3rd term.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
SvixGale 3 points ago +3 / -0

Freedom boner!!

2
CocaineRimJob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don Jr/Powell

Trump becomes head of the RNC like Stalin was head of the Party. But in a less mass murdery-sort of way

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
22
sunnyingreenfield 22 points ago +22 / -0

thank you for the lulz

19
Ninki333 19 points ago +19 / -0

Good lord I am actually watching A New Hope as I type this.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
KS-76- 10 points ago +10 / -0

I agree. Revenge of the Sith has aged well. It's better than 99% of all the shitty movies that have come out over the past decade.

9
ChrisSuperDude 9 points ago +9 / -0

For me it goes:

New Hope

Empire

Jedi

Revenge of the Sith

Phantom Menace

Attack of the Clones

Disney movies are non-canon as they were simply fan fiction stories with a massive production value.

2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

What the actual hell. I watched Revenge last night. Planning on A New Hope tonight.

Not planning on watching the JJ/Johnson abominations, but I might watch Rogue One again.

3
Ninki333 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've not even subjected myself to watch the latest SW Trilogy. I'm pretty sure I'm better off not having watched it lol

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rogue One was... okay. Solo was... okay.

None of them really can hold a candle to the original films. Not by a long shot.

147
JasonGenova_IFBB_Pro 147 points ago +147 / -0

I still find it hilariously arrogant that all the social media companies thought they could prevent this guy’s name from getting out simply by deleting any mention of it from their platforms.

They really think they are “the internet,” don’t they?

64
LiberalismIsTheVirus 64 points ago +64 / -0

It's arrogance, plain and simple

39
Butcher_bear 39 points ago +39 / -0

Not really. I would wager that there are tons of things the social media and corporate media ran cover for that we never really heard about.

32
SickIcarus 32 points ago +33 / -1

If by “we” you mean “the country, we” then I would agree.

If by “we” you mean “TD.win / 4chan, we” then I’d vehemently disagree. We are like the eye of Sauron, we see everything.

9
FireannDireach 9 points ago +9 / -0

Like Antifa starting fires?

3
JudgeWhoAllowsStuff 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah like Alpha Jalloh in the killing of Seth Rich. Also the Awan brothers have effectively been memory holed.

3
LiberalismIsTheVirus 3 points ago +3 / -0

The story will always spread if it's heard by a decent size audience. The only way it will not spread is if they killed everyone which is not what they're doing.

17
Dominick 17 points ago +17 / -0

It's effective. If you asked the average person on the street who Eric CIAramella is they would have no clue.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
LiberalismIsTheVirus 3 points ago +4 / -1

I agree with that but that's because the media doesn't shine a light on it. There's a difference between making the story nonexistent and having ignorance in the masses.

2
cicicicico 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone give me a quick rundown on who this is? Im newish.

2
orangemanwins202020 2 points ago +2 / -0

so... since i don't really know much about him...

he was a whistle blower? was he super corrupt or something?

7
NinjaPede 7 points ago +7 / -0

It’s actually pretty fucking insane, in the United States of America.

18
BlancheNegre 18 points ago +18 / -0

I believe there need to be new laws in relation to social media that prevent censorship of any kind if the content is not illegal, or sexually explicit. There is no reason why these platforms should be curating speech. In fact, there need to be strict legal protections to protect people from politically motivated 'deplatforming' or 'canceling' of any kind. The people have a natural right to freedom of speech, freedom of opinion, and freedom of religion. That right should under no circumstance be infringed.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
5
cicicicico 5 points ago +6 / -1

That cant really work in reality. That would mean bidenbros could come brigade here and there would be nothing we could do. Its really more complicated than just making a law that says no censorship because you have to let a website retain the right to curate a certain community but at the same time not let a few bad actors control the entire narrative.

1
GoldenHurrdurr 1 point ago +1 / -0

But if it's your own site, you should be able to set whatever rules you like.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Jimmy33 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn right

7
TowerLake 7 points ago +7 / -0

What?

Can someone explain for those who dont know who Eric Ciaramella is

22
ChrisSuperDude 22 points ago +22 / -0

He was the traitor who pushed the "Trump withheld money from Ukraine" hoax that lead to the impeachment scam. When the shampeachment was happening the Anti-social media was censoring anyone who said his name.

7
Stukov 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is actually worse than that, supposedly he was a scapegoat for the fact that Trump was wiretapped for that conversation by the CIA/Five Eyes with a FISA type warrant, hence why Roberts wouldn't let his name be used because that is not how the information was obtained (but was leaked illegally to all those who used it).

More dirty shit by the FBI.

14
Dominick 14 points ago +14 / -0

Eric CIAramella is the Trump-Ukraine "whistleblower."

13
Tabascocat 13 points ago +14 / -1

You forgot ‘paid handsomely’ whistleblower in there.....

4
TowerLake 4 points ago +4 / -0

So it was him. I remember him and Big tech trying to erase him, i just forgot his name.

10
SickIcarus 10 points ago +10 / -0

Just google it... oh, wait.

3
turanian_552 3 points ago +3 / -0

They also think they are "the news". Not anymore!

6
sunnyingreenfield 6 points ago +6 / -0

WE THE NEWS NOW

3
LLegendary 3 points ago +3 / -0

These people can NOT win.

62
Tookens 62 points ago +63 / -1

CNN hasn't given us permission to use that name yet, have they?

18
FedUpAndReady 18 points ago +19 / -1

He is mentioned in the document, therefore normal people are not allowed to read it, only media outlets. Big brain speaking here.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Newuser9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lemon party!

8
cornfedandconfused 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is forboooden!

6
Pederella 6 points ago +6 / -0

We should wait until Mark Dice's Brian Stelter lets us know.

4
Wilson 4 points ago +4 / -0

You sure as fuck better not mention George Soros !!! We don't use that name around here

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
9
Vashts1985 9 points ago +9 / -0

La Li Lu Le Lo?!