I still find it hilariously arrogant that all the social media companies thought they could prevent this guy’s name from getting out simply by deleting any mention of it from their platforms.
They really think they are “the internet,” don’t they?
The story will always spread if it's heard by a decent size audience. The only way it will not spread is if they killed everyone which is not what they're doing.
Ackshully, I believe I still might have a Ciaramella post up on my wall, or whatever it’s called... but I’ve been off Faceberg completely for 9 months now, and have never been happier... so I’m not going to check.
Because Faceberg is a totalitarian dystopia masquerading as something not completely fucked up.
And yeah, some Chinese Faceberg censor probably has spezzed that Ciramella post sometime since I last logged on. So much totalitarianing to do, so little time!
I agree with that but that's because the media doesn't shine a light on it. There's a difference between making the story nonexistent and having ignorance in the masses.
This is the guy who told Congress that POTUS had a call with Ukraine investigating Biden's ties to Ukraine (which we now know was rightfully done, because we found out just how deeplu Biden and his son Hunter were involved with corruption in Ukraine). Saying this man's name can get you banned from some social media. If you say it in a YouTube livestream, Google's speech recognition AI will pick it up and automatically nuke your stream. The media doesn't talk about him. People have done all they can to make it like he doesn't exist. Because he's a Deep State tool and if you actually showed all of this evidence to normies they would jump on the Trump Train immediately.
This is the guy who told Congress that POTUS had a call with Ukraine investigating Biden's ties to Ukraine (which we now know was rightfully done, because we found out just how deeplu Biden and his son Hunter were involved with corruption in Ukraine). Saying this man's name can get you banned from some social media. If you say it in a YouTube livestream, Google's speech recognition AI will pick it up and automatically nuke your stream. The media doesn't talk about him. People have done all they can to make it like he doesn't exist. Because he's a Deep State tool and if you actually showed all of this evidence to normies they would jump on the Trump Train immediately.
I believe there need to be new laws in relation to social media that prevent censorship of any kind if the content is not illegal, or sexually explicit. There is no reason why these platforms should be curating speech. In fact, there need to be strict legal protections to protect people from politically motivated 'deplatforming' or 'canceling' of any kind. The people have a natural right to freedom of speech, freedom of opinion, and freedom of religion. That right should under no circumstance be infringed.
That cant really work in reality. That would mean bidenbros could come brigade here and there would be nothing we could do. Its really more complicated than just making a law that says no censorship because you have to let a website retain the right to curate a certain community but at the same time not let a few bad actors control the entire narrative.
The libertarian in me would agree with you. Im not really sure there is a principled argument against that. I think someone could make the national security argument but thats a very dangerous precedent.
He was the traitor who pushed the "Trump withheld money from Ukraine" hoax that lead to the impeachment scam. When the shampeachment was happening the Anti-social media was censoring anyone who said his name.
It is actually worse than that, supposedly he was a scapegoat for the fact that Trump was wiretapped for that conversation by the CIA/Five Eyes with a FISA type warrant, hence why Roberts wouldn't let his name be used because that is not how the information was obtained (but was leaked illegally to all those who used it).
I still find it hilariously arrogant that all the social media companies thought they could prevent this guy’s name from getting out simply by deleting any mention of it from their platforms.
They really think they are “the internet,” don’t they?
It's arrogance, plain and simple
Not really. I would wager that there are tons of things the social media and corporate media ran cover for that we never really heard about.
If by “we” you mean “the country, we” then I would agree.
If by “we” you mean “TD.win / 4chan, we” then I’d vehemently disagree. We are like the eye of Sauron, we see everything.
This needs a meme or three...
Like Antifa starting fires?
Yes. 100%. The media smothered that like a Newsom superaide smothers a 4-year old child.
Yeah like Alpha Jalloh in the killing of Seth Rich. Also the Awan brothers have effectively been memory holed.
The story will always spread if it's heard by a decent size audience. The only way it will not spread is if they killed everyone which is not what they're doing.
Not true, information is suppressed. A good example is Hunter's laptop, we knew but most of America was kept in the dark.
It's effective. If you asked the average person on the street who Eric CIAramella is they would have no clue.
Ackshully, I believe I still might have a Ciaramella post up on my wall, or whatever it’s called... but I’ve been off Faceberg completely for 9 months now, and have never been happier... so I’m not going to check.
Because Faceberg is a totalitarian dystopia masquerading as something not completely fucked up.
And yeah, some Chinese Faceberg censor probably has spezzed that Ciramella post sometime since I last logged on. So much totalitarianing to do, so little time!
I agree with that but that's because the media doesn't shine a light on it. There's a difference between making the story nonexistent and having ignorance in the masses.
Can someone give me a quick rundown on who this is? Im newish.
This is the guy who told Congress that POTUS had a call with Ukraine investigating Biden's ties to Ukraine (which we now know was rightfully done, because we found out just how deeplu Biden and his son Hunter were involved with corruption in Ukraine). Saying this man's name can get you banned from some social media. If you say it in a YouTube livestream, Google's speech recognition AI will pick it up and automatically nuke your stream. The media doesn't talk about him. People have done all they can to make it like he doesn't exist. Because he's a Deep State tool and if you actually showed all of this evidence to normies they would jump on the Trump Train immediately.
so... since i don't really know much about him...
he was a whistle blower? was he super corrupt or something?
This is the guy who told Congress that POTUS had a call with Ukraine investigating Biden's ties to Ukraine (which we now know was rightfully done, because we found out just how deeplu Biden and his son Hunter were involved with corruption in Ukraine). Saying this man's name can get you banned from some social media. If you say it in a YouTube livestream, Google's speech recognition AI will pick it up and automatically nuke your stream. The media doesn't talk about him. People have done all they can to make it like he doesn't exist. Because he's a Deep State tool and if you actually showed all of this evidence to normies they would jump on the Trump Train immediately.
It’s actually pretty fucking insane, in the United States of America.
I believe there need to be new laws in relation to social media that prevent censorship of any kind if the content is not illegal, or sexually explicit. There is no reason why these platforms should be curating speech. In fact, there need to be strict legal protections to protect people from politically motivated 'deplatforming' or 'canceling' of any kind. The people have a natural right to freedom of speech, freedom of opinion, and freedom of religion. That right should under no circumstance be infringed.
That cant really work in reality. That would mean bidenbros could come brigade here and there would be nothing we could do. Its really more complicated than just making a law that says no censorship because you have to let a website retain the right to curate a certain community but at the same time not let a few bad actors control the entire narrative.
But if it's your own site, you should be able to set whatever rules you like.
What does “your own site” even mean? Think about what you actually own.
The libertarian in me would agree with you. Im not really sure there is a principled argument against that. I think someone could make the national security argument but thats a very dangerous precedent.
Damn right
What?
Can someone explain for those who dont know who Eric Ciaramella is
He was the traitor who pushed the "Trump withheld money from Ukraine" hoax that lead to the impeachment scam. When the shampeachment was happening the Anti-social media was censoring anyone who said his name.
It is actually worse than that, supposedly he was a scapegoat for the fact that Trump was wiretapped for that conversation by the CIA/Five Eyes with a FISA type warrant, hence why Roberts wouldn't let his name be used because that is not how the information was obtained (but was leaked illegally to all those who used it).
More dirty shit by the FBI.
Eric CIAramella is the Trump-Ukraine "whistleblower."
You forgot ‘paid handsomely’ whistleblower in there.....
So it was him. I remember him and Big tech trying to erase him, i just forgot his name.
Just google it... oh, wait.
They also think they are "the news". Not anymore!
WE THE NEWS NOW
These people can NOT win.