That would be a vote for his own dilution of power. If Kumonya becomes president, courts will be packed and the entire rule of constitutional law will be discarded. The type of law he spent his entire life journaling about since he was a wee lad. I doubt very much that he would be that short-sighted.
Did u read the article I linked to? It's from before the election. He ruled with cuck roberts that NC could could ballots 9 days after election so long as they were post-marked by election day.
Now you expect him to go the other way? Some of the merits from the NC will implicitly if not explicitly be mentioned or considered in the TX case id think. Your logic would require that he'd change his mind from when he made this ruling.
I read a story s few months ago that there have been multiple times where it seemed kavanaugh was gonna rule with the conservatives, Roberts pulled him aside, and then he ruled with the cuck traitor roberts and the libs. I don't have an original link though.
LOL first pharagraph man : The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed North Carolina to count mail-in ballots up to nine days after the election as long as the ballots are postmarked by election day.
Who cares how long they counted for ...the law that has to be postmarked correctly was upheld..this ruling was about how long it took to actually count ballot not allow ballots that were 9 days late to be allowed. The case before them now is regarding laws being changed by the executives thereby usurping the power of the legislatures ..not how long it takes to count things..
I understand that. Don't accuse me of not reading the article. The point is he even allowed something so corrupt. The post mark means nothing. Easily chested and made up.
I don't know what the law says in NC about when vote totals need to be reported by. Without looking at the whole case however i would say to deny the violations outlined in the Texas case would be a far greater move..we will have to see.
And the postmark means everything ..thats the law and that is how they avoid fraud. If they attempted to cheat that part of the system i imagine you would see the same types of whistleblowers that we are seeing now where employees of usps are saying they were told to commit fraud.
Thanks for the clarification! This is somewhat settling although idk how to reconcile today's 9-0 decision. Can't singularly blame kavanaugh at 9-0 though.
I've been telling people he's gonna sell us down the river and sl our the country. No hard evidence though. I forgot he stood there with this ruling already.
Ya. I know "doomers" right? I post about the dumb anti-doomers all the time. Stupidly optimistic. Heads in the sand avoiding looking at reality. We're winning! (While court cases are lost again and again)
Anyway, you're right. How will it go? Is it gonna be all military if this would ever happen? By the way I don't think it will. I think he'll leave peacefully and we'll be a fallen nation and stepping in to the start of the end times. I think it's what NEEDS to happen, but it just won't. Anyway, so is it gonna be our military rounding people up for military tribunal trials since all our courts are corrupt? He gets to pick the judge's in a military tribunal doesn't he?
Or does he get on this nation wide emergency broadcast Network, tell us all what's happening, round up a lot with the military, but also request patriots to help at certain locations?
Let's entertain the crazy Q talk because sadly I believe it's the only option left.
That would be a vote for his own dilution of power. If Kumonya becomes president, courts will be packed and the entire rule of constitutional law will be discarded. The type of law he spent his entire life journaling about since he was a wee lad. I doubt very much that he would be that short-sighted.
Did u read the article I linked to? It's from before the election. He ruled with cuck roberts that NC could could ballots 9 days after election so long as they were post-marked by election day.
Now you expect him to go the other way? Some of the merits from the NC will implicitly if not explicitly be mentioned or considered in the TX case id think. Your logic would require that he'd change his mind from when he made this ruling.
I read a story s few months ago that there have been multiple times where it seemed kavanaugh was gonna rule with the conservatives, Roberts pulled him aside, and then he ruled with the cuck traitor roberts and the libs. I don't have an original link though.
LOL first pharagraph man : The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed North Carolina to count mail-in ballots up to nine days after the election as long as the ballots are postmarked by election day.
Who cares how long they counted for ...the law that has to be postmarked correctly was upheld..this ruling was about how long it took to actually count ballot not allow ballots that were 9 days late to be allowed. The case before them now is regarding laws being changed by the executives thereby usurping the power of the legislatures ..not how long it takes to count things..
I understand that. Don't accuse me of not reading the article. The point is he even allowed something so corrupt. The post mark means nothing. Easily chested and made up.
I don't know what the law says in NC about when vote totals need to be reported by. Without looking at the whole case however i would say to deny the violations outlined in the Texas case would be a far greater move..we will have to see.
And the postmark means everything ..thats the law and that is how they avoid fraud. If they attempted to cheat that part of the system i imagine you would see the same types of whistleblowers that we are seeing now where employees of usps are saying they were told to commit fraud.
Thanks for the clarification! This is somewhat settling although idk how to reconcile today's 9-0 decision. Can't singularly blame kavanaugh at 9-0 though.
Let it not be so. Brett likes beer. I like beer. I can actually imagine sitting down and having a beer with Brett. He’ll do the right thing.
I've been telling people he's gonna sell us down the river and sl our the country. No hard evidence though. I forgot he stood there with this ruling already.
Military option is all that's left.
Ya. I know "doomers" right? I post about the dumb anti-doomers all the time. Stupidly optimistic. Heads in the sand avoiding looking at reality. We're winning! (While court cases are lost again and again)
Anyway, you're right. How will it go? Is it gonna be all military if this would ever happen? By the way I don't think it will. I think he'll leave peacefully and we'll be a fallen nation and stepping in to the start of the end times. I think it's what NEEDS to happen, but it just won't. Anyway, so is it gonna be our military rounding people up for military tribunal trials since all our courts are corrupt? He gets to pick the judge's in a military tribunal doesn't he?
Or does he get on this nation wide emergency broadcast Network, tell us all what's happening, round up a lot with the military, but also request patriots to help at certain locations?
Let's entertain the crazy Q talk because sadly I believe it's the only option left.
Had the stench of a Bush on him. That's enough for me.
Though a week earlier he sided was against PA 3 day counting ballots after the election where it was tied 4-4. Not sure the difference in the cases.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/roberts-sides-with-liberals-scotus-allows-pa-to-accept-ballots-three-days-late