They are giving their full support and have offered services. It gives weight when going to the SCOTUS, it means all these other states have the same grievance.
Is the supreme court reading the twitter threads? Id imagine the 'support' wont be considered unless they add their name to the suit or write something more formal. Which brings me to why is he saying 'support' but nothing concrete?
They are giving their full support and have offered services. It gives weight when going to the SCOTUS, it means all these other states have the same grievance.
Is the supreme court reading the twitter threads? Id imagine the 'support' wont be considered unless they add their name to the suit or write something more formal. Which brings me to why is he saying 'support' but nothing concrete?
The same AGs who are giving support now are the same ones who were involved in filing on 11/9. They're not just shit talking.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-542/160113/20201109134744257_2020-11-09%20-%20Republican%20Party%20of%20Pa.%20v.%20Boockvar%20-%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Missouri%20et%20al.%20-%20Final%20With%20Tables.pdf