The states in question received ballots/votes after election day. Thus, making them illegal. States receiving ballots at 3am on Nov. 4th is included in the lawsuit.
maybe, however if the ballots where post marked before election day, they would not be relevant to FvL, due to state legislator/law stating that they could arrive after polls close and be counted.
The states in question received ballots/votes after election day. Thus, making them illegal. States receiving ballots at 3am on Nov. 4th is included in the lawsuit.
Foster v Love is relevant here.
maybe, however if the ballots where post marked before election day, they would not be relevant to FvL, due to state legislator/law stating that they could arrive after polls close and be counted.
PA was accepting ballots without even a postmark.
yes due to a judgment, not really a FvL issue, but a bypassing the state legislator issue.