It has been extensively tested in many countries over the past 9 months with amazing results. The scientific proof is overwhelming, as opposed to the big pharma "vaccines" which are poorly tested, seem to only suppress symptoms and might cause female infertility.
I imagine we'd be hearing that covid has been wiped out in Brazil, since they are using it there with so much frequency they can't even get a phase 3 trial because everyone practically speaking has already used it. lol.
You know that about 90% of cases detected with PCR tests are potentially false positives? This is not according to an obscure website but to the new york times. They are generally fake news but they did a proper research this time, google it. You can find other right-leaning sources saying the same. So covid-19 cases are a nothing burger.
I agree that covid is a plandemic with high survival rates.
NYT did this too. Although I do not trust experts (CDC, etc) that have motivations just like everyone else and like Scott Adams I believe says the average joe like me has no way to validate claims of one expert against the opposite claims of another.
Anybody got a link to a paper? edit:
testimony Dr. Kory
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Testimony-Kory-2020-12-08.pdf
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
https://osf.io/wx3zn/
Very satisfying. Not sure yet how easily available this is in the US.
Found other links
https://c19ivermectin.com
https://www.evms.edu/media/evms_public/departments/internal_medicine/EVMS_Critical_Care_COVID-19_Protocol.pdf
www.ivmmeta.com
There is real medical evidence to back up the use of ivermectin for covid. This group has done a lot of research.
https://www.evms.edu/covid-19/covid_care_for_clinicians/
https://www.evms.edu/media/evms_public/departments/internal_medicine/EVMS_Critical_Care_COVID-19_Protocol.pdf
Links to papers and data:
https://c19ivermectin.com/
I am assuming zinc, z-pack & HCQ or quercetin are no longer legal?
I read not long ago that HCQ was approved. It seems though that ivermectin is even more effective.
Anything other than a hastily developed "vaccine" is worth looking into.
First two search results:
Do not use https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
Do use https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/ivermectin-treat-covid-19-coronavirus-3535912/
You linked studies from August. The Doctor testifying is referring to recent studies. My guess is that you didn't even watch the video.
Another account less than a day old shitting on a very promising treatment.
Not downplaying anything.
There are two links. One says "use it" and the other says "do not use".
Highlighting the push against non-vaccine related health options.
Lol we give tgat shit to horses when they have worms . calling bullshit
It has been extensively tested in many countries over the past 9 months with amazing results. The scientific proof is overwhelming, as opposed to the big pharma "vaccines" which are poorly tested, seem to only suppress symptoms and might cause female infertility.
Dude i by the shit right off the shelf at tsc
Don't be a rigger and read about it, it works.
Did you say the same about HCQ because it's used for malaria? Did you even watch the video?
yes, i agree with you. this is nonsense.
are you a fact checker? You should consider working as one, your argument is worthy of being in a DEBOONKED article for snopes or something like that.
I imagine we'd be hearing that covid has been wiped out in Brazil, since they are using it there with so much frequency they can't even get a phase 3 trial because everyone practically speaking has already used it. lol.
You know that about 90% of cases detected with PCR tests are potentially false positives? This is not according to an obscure website but to the new york times. They are generally fake news but they did a proper research this time, google it. You can find other right-leaning sources saying the same. So covid-19 cases are a nothing burger.
I agree that covid is a plandemic with high survival rates.
NYT did this too. Although I do not trust experts (CDC, etc) that have motivations just like everyone else and like Scott Adams I believe says the average joe like me has no way to validate claims of one expert against the opposite claims of another.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-drugs-treatments.html