6987
Comments (182)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
73
shaven_llama 73 points ago +73 / -0

I used to subscribe to the WSJ. Was thinking about doing so again, even though it's expensive. Then the (so far attempted) stolen election happened and WSJ jumped on board with the rest of the press in falling in behind Biden.

Found the Epoch Times - subscribed. Cheaper too.

62
deleted 62 points ago +62 / -0
38
deleted 38 points ago +38 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
-10
deleted -10 points ago +4 / -14
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
SaltyKrakenBalls 3 points ago +3 / -0

The main reason I subscribed earlier this year. Fucking commie asshoooes...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
shaven_llama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make sense, since the parent ET is based in the good China (Taiwan).

26
Mareep 26 points ago +26 / -0

WSJ is part of the Murdoch Empire, who have been moving mostly in lock-step since election night.

People forget that Fox tried to dismantle Trump's campaign in the 2016 primaries, only for him to win the fight (by tanking their ratings) and forcing Murdoch to capitulate to Ailes, who recognised early on that Trump was going to win.

7
EdmondDantesDog 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is all true.

But at the same time it's the liberal mindset that is around in the form of Kushner and Ivanka

1
Mareep 1 point ago +1 / -0

While they are very liberal and aren't necessarily giving great advice, at least they are 100% loyal to Trump.

Murdoch is only loyal to himself.

4
Liberty49220 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just cancelled my 30-year WSJ subscription. The customer service rep was friendly and did not give me too hard of a time. She asked why and I told her because the paper wasn't seriously covering the biggest news (stolen election). Whether it was part of her script, I don't know, but she says I'm not the only one. I will miss Kimberly Strassel and the smart editorial coverage, but it's not worth $50/month.

4
SnowflakeJuice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Has anyone seen Ruport recently? Seems like he may be out of the picture entirely now. That would explain a lot.

4
hansgruber7 4 points ago +4 / -0

The bigger shift was when Roger Ailes died. He was the driving force behind Fox being conservative. I read that Murdoch wanted to endorse Obama, but Ailes threatened to resign if he did, so Murdoch didn't. Once Ailes died, Murdoch was free to go full CNN, with his sons being a driving force.

11
keep_america_great 11 points ago +11 / -0

I cancelled mine too after like 20 years. Had to change address to a random California address to cancel it online, otherwise you have to call to cancel.

4
bluebahloo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why is that?

12
keep_america_great 12 points ago +12 / -0

California law says that you have to make the same means available to cancel as it is to sign up (so if a service has online sign up they have to offer online canceling). Outside of California WSJ requires you to call (and wait a half hour on hold and receive a high pressure retention pitch).

3
Badgunno 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cali got something right.

2
bluebahloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow slimey.

1
pup1pup 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was happy with calling. Got to tell someone why I was cancelling. They probably didn't care though . . .

4
hansgruber7 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was subscribed to the WSJ for 15 years. Just unsubscribed last month. It has become garbage. I love Kim Strassel and a few other opinion columns, but Peggy Noonan's inane navel-gazing was insufferable. The News page is basically CNN light.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

Online only. Physical newspapers tend to pile up unread in my house these days.