Their request for injunctive relief is denied. The case is not scheduled to be heard, as far as I know, but it's not been outright rejected. I believe their team can file briefs to add to the TX v GA case if they want, which may make their case moot.
From what I have read on here, this is wrong. Injunctive relief was needed if there were no other lawsuits. Their application for injunctive relief was made irrelevant by the TX case. At least this is what I was told. I have no idea.
My video editing skills are rusty but I believe that I could be brought up to speed with some Skillshare type videos. Yes to research skills. Network security was my hobby 20 years ago but I never pursued a career in that field. My current field is property management and property development. Just let me know if there is anything that I can help out with.
Hey, the odds of Biden not getting enough of those late votes are only 999,999,999,999,999 in 1,000,000,000,000,000 according to the math. The Joepedo still has a chance!
Almost the same chance as a hurricane blowing through an aircraft wrecking yard and assembling an intact 747. Theoretically its possible. So Joe won :)
My boss came to me after the first debate and really felt that Trump “lost” because how he he acted during it. He really believed Trump shot himself in the foot. He’s a small business owner, and Trump supporter and voted R all of his life but he firmly believed it. I told him Trump’s base doesn’t give a fuck how he acts and it’s a reason WHY he won in 2016. Anyone who tells you otherwise is an idiot and isn’t paying attention to his base.
I told him to quit watching Fox News and every other MSM outlet.
The other day he stormed in all pissed off and was telling me how much fraud has been uncovered. I agreed and gave him an, “I told ya so.” His son who also works there was telling us, “Guys I voted for him, but he lost!” Hes an avid Fox News/CNN watcher, but not as informed. I told him he’s the perfect brain washing candidate for them because he just eats up whatever they say with no skepticism whatsoever. Nice guy, just kind of a dope sometimes.
The MSM’s efforts to demoralize TRUMP republicans is sadly having an effect, which is why it’s so important that people on here spread the news. Get your family, friends, and co-workers off of the MSM’s vice grip. It’s possible, and the more eyes you open, the healthier this country will become.
Most of the faculty at the university where I used to work are like that. Generally bright folks, but terrified of breaking lockstep with the rest of the ultraliberal community around them.
The fact is most people are sheep, they are followers not leaders and really don't care about much beyond their own survival and entertainment. It's made worse by a gutted education system and constant proganda indoctrinating people 24/7.
EDIT: The president says that states are joining, and so expects them to join. None have joined thus far. Do not stop contacting your AGs, Reps, and Govs, demanding them to join the TX lawsuit and file amicus briefs, something which no state has done thus far.
Read POTUS' tweet very carefully. I also expect other states to join, none have joined thus far. Which is why it's still important to reach out to your AGs, Govs, and Reps, and demand them to join as well as file amicus briefs.
Right, he's indicating that many other states will join the case. I'm simply pointing out that no other state has joined the TX lawsuit yet, and so we shouldn't stop contacting and pressuring our AGs.
Notice how there's no additional plantiffs yet, and no other state has filled an amicus brief. Furthermore, if any state AG has joined, they would have put out a statement with the same information. While I do expect states to join, they haven't done so yet. So its not sweing disinformation, it's informing our users of what's actually happened, and so we shouldn't stop contacting our AGs damnit.
EDIT: 9 hours ago, this was true. Obviously, now we're in a much better position. Keep up the good work pedes, keep phoning your legislatures and your AGs and demand them to #FightForTrump
Thanks for your explanation, Chest. In the meantime I read some other comments as well and now I have a better understanding than 30 minutes ago. I am really curious whether SCOTUS will take the case and how they will decide. Fingers crossed. It is a great case from Texas.
From what I've researched this morning, this is not true according to federal guidelines. Not to be a snooty Snopes douchebag but it does seem to be deboooonked
Could be wrong, but I think it just means that Trump will be adding himself/his campaign to the list of plaintiffs. President does not have any actual power over the SCOTUS
I have seen a man on the subway fully retreat into his hoodie and narrate to himself the inside of his hoodie as though he were walking through a mansion
And I would take his opinion on anything more seriously than I would these fact-checkers at this point
That's all they see bc that's all they're looking for. More opportunities to attack POTUS by slapping a "disputed" tag on his tweets.
I have to imagine the Law of Diminishing Returns is starting to kick in, and people are beginning to distrust those labels. Even the normies and leftists.
This is it. This is the big enchilada. If this fails, it not only puts a pin in Trump's admin. It changes the country forever, even the world. They would have solidified that the US Constitution can be subverted when there is a national emergency declared. This opens up unlimited abuse of the constitution, so say goodbye to your ARs.
We won't have a Republic if they get this one wrong. Subverting the vote is the end of the grand experiment called the United States. And you know what shape the country will take if Biden succeeds - just look at any 3rd world country.
I don't think most pedes truly understand. If we can't have honest elections, we have NOTHING. It's over.
Levin was all depressed about the PA case last night and was mystified by the Court's immediate rejection of the injunction appeal, when they had made such a big deal about the case beforehand. Why suddenly reject an appeal without comment when you had made such a big deal about it? (He also predicted that the court is going to dismiss the case itself.)
Here's an explanation for the SCOTUS's behavior. The Court hadn't made up its mind. Then, at midnight a few hours before the Court would have to make up its mind, the Texas suit appeared. This suit encompasses the PA case and more, making the PA case unnecessary. So, the Court immediately dismissed the PA appeal.
This a bit on the hopium side, but it explains the inexplicable.
These people you have to understand need viewership. Which of these is going to get these types more viewers over the next 4 years- A death slide into communism, or 4 years of grill and chill with daddy Trump?
I was gonna say this, but he has a lot of fans here, didn't want to stir the pot, pedes are upset enough as it is. I like Mark, but I don't listen regularly because all he does is yell.
Especially the fact that they denied it 9-0. That tells me they have something bigger in the works. Plus they agreed 6-3 to hear the Texas case already so that gives you an idea of how they might vote.
I haven't got through his entire show yet but he was dooming hard at the beginning. Does he change tact at some point? He sounded defeated at the start
The PA case is too PA specific to expect it to solve the problems overall. The TX case does that. Pedes have been saying for weeks, "But if we win one state, what about the others?" This filing by TX answers that. But Kelly should have filed. There should be MORE lawsuits, to bring attention to the steal. If it fails, that sucks, but it's one battle of a very big war.
I didn't see the TX case coming. They've obviously been working on it a while, and it's reasonable to believe that Rudy, Sidney, and the President knew and were sharing all their info with them. It could explain the President's confidence. If the Texas case didn't exist, I'd be really upset about Kelly's case.
If you really care about the facts and want to be able to present a good argument for this lawsuit, you have an obligation to actually read this suit. If you just want to make stupid KFC memes and retarded upvote posts, then you aren't really helping.
CNN has already deboooonked every Trump Tweet without even using phrases such as End of World, Armageddon, and Sky is Falling:
(CNN)The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of the commonwealth's election results, delivering a near fatal blow to the GOP's long-shot bid to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden's victory.
The Supreme Court's action is a crushing loss for Trump, who has frequently touted the high court's potential to overturn his election loss.
...
After Labor Day, Bush campaign had a reboot, sending GOP governors off around the country. There were 31 GOP governors, including W, so 30 planned to go. One had a family event, so only 29 of the 30 showed up on Capitol steps at press conference for kickoff. Guess what Wolf Blitzed called the fraction 29/30 ??
So everything boiled down to this? So you can cheat in an election as much as you want and there is no recourse except have the highest court in the land somehow overturn it. This seems a bit insane to me. At this point I don't believe anybody got elected except if they ran in opposed.
Pretty much. Vote fraud has been going on forever, they just were never this blatant, because the Dems and outside forces like Soros have been taking over the mechanisms of law and order across the country for decades, and were in position to pull this off (or so they think.)
If you think about it, this is the first time any real attention has been paid to issues with the vote since 2000. Or ever. "Go along to get along" is the mantra in DC and states - don't talk about ballot theft, because we might all lose our cushy government jobs, doncha know.
Trump is the first President to try and blow this all wide open. Because he's not part of the system/swamp. Nobody wants to believe the corruption is this deep, this firmly rooted, they want to stay in their warm, comfy bubble with their Netflix and avocado toast. That's what's pushing back the hardest - complacency.
Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I personally think it might suit POTUS to not weigh in on this one, so that the SCOTUS can leave any personal biases against him to the side (at least four of them won't), and let the case be about we the people.
I agree with you! And his intervention thing worried me. Texas is in a really unique position and I don’t want any biases to undermine that. I’m sure the Sekulow’s, Ellis and Rudy will advise him correctly.
Sorry to correct you, Mr. Dr. GEOTUS, but the majority of Americans KNOW the election was rigged. Even dems know but I don't expect sociopaths to be forthcoming with the truth about their depravity.
The left went far too big with their cheating for it to be overlooked. Every state that refuses to join shows that they are ALSO GUILTY OF CHEATING and dont want to get involved. If you didnt cheat, your name needs to be on this.
Page 18. Bullet 55. Pennsylvania did not segregate all ballots received after 8PM like Justice Alito ordered. Boockvar's claim that only 10,000 ballots were received after this deadline has no way of being proven. It may be hundreds of thousands of ballots.
Sadly the problem is both sides feel this way. The good news is trump did win and I'd bet that biden got a fraction of his "81 million votes" so there's not really much to worry about as far as civil war or whatever. The bad news is the idiot left won't actually look at any evidence or can't be reasoned with. Like how the fuck can you "disenfranchise" a voter whos dead or someone who voted 30x because of fraud? Thats just dems cheating. But the narrative will for sure be "trump stole it, this is dangerous for our democracy, this is sedition, blah blah blah"
Beyond the obvious fraud of letting dead voters vote, you disenfranchise voters when you allow for illegal elections that break election law. PA eliminating safe guards like signature verification on mailed in ballots without changing election law is the poster child for this shitshow of the 2020 election.
We have been waiting for the Pennsylvania Kelly case.
Ted Cruz was ready to argue that case. Ted said it was a strong case. Is that case essentially gone now??
Can someone get me up to speed, here? The Texas case is our Last Best Hope? OR are there still Rudy or Sidney cases filed that are out there?
I get the impression that we're down to only the Texas case (God bless Texas) but there MUST BE MORE....right?
This is it folks.... We're all in at this point. No way we lose. Something big is gonna drop during this, I can feel it. Someone big, I hope, has flipped.
Follow up:
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Their request for injunctive relief is denied. The case is not scheduled to be heard, as far as I know, but it's not been outright rejected. I believe their team can file briefs to add to the TX v GA case if they want, which may make their case moot.
From what I have read on here, this is wrong. Injunctive relief was needed if there were no other lawsuits. Their application for injunctive relief was made irrelevant by the TX case. At least this is what I was told. I have no idea.
Lasers are for night vision, larping, and sometimes intimidation. Otherwise they are slower than learning to use your sites/optic
And cats
Some guy trying to sell cheap ass laser to people who can aim like normal folks.
Fooking laser sights!
BASEDMedia? Does anybody know anything about this group?
Thanks for verifying. is there anything that I can do to help (aside from spreading the word about this site)?
Do you have video editing skills? Solid research skills? Signal analysis skills? math/stat graphics extra good in excel, etc?
My video editing skills are rusty but I believe that I could be brought up to speed with some Skillshare type videos. Yes to research skills. Network security was my hobby 20 years ago but I never pursued a career in that field. My current field is property management and property development. Just let me know if there is anything that I can help out with.
Love your name!!!
Thanks for the effort. You guys are doing yeoman's work out there
What website? just error messages
I had to put www. in front.
First I've heard of it
Getting an error message on the link for Donaldwon.com
Nice. This is the second time I've seen this website today so I guess awareness is increasing!
We don't think it was rigged. We KNOW it was rigged.
Hey, the odds of Biden not getting enough of those late votes are only 999,999,999,999,999 in 1,000,000,000,000,000 according to the math. The Joepedo still has a chance!
So you're telling me there's a chance!
Almost the same chance as a hurricane blowing through an aircraft wrecking yard and assembling an intact 747. Theoretically its possible. So Joe won :)
About the same chances as Kayleigh Mcenany leaving her husband and marrying me. (Which I think she should do)
You just basically said that there is a 99.9999999999999% chance he did win those votes.
Oof, I got it wrong! His chances of getting the votes are 1 in a quadrillion!
You've quoted me but I'm fixing it anyway :)
Nice Freudian slip.
"Harris administration"
Enjoy your feminist tyranny. Do not come crying to us when you're treated as subhuman by her.
My cuck friends know biden is shit. Know the election was rigged. They dgaf. Hung up on pigments. They do not even understand America.
So obviously not smart. ;)
All the pseudo-intellectuals I know are Democrats.
My boss came to me after the first debate and really felt that Trump “lost” because how he he acted during it. He really believed Trump shot himself in the foot. He’s a small business owner, and Trump supporter and voted R all of his life but he firmly believed it. I told him Trump’s base doesn’t give a fuck how he acts and it’s a reason WHY he won in 2016. Anyone who tells you otherwise is an idiot and isn’t paying attention to his base.
I told him to quit watching Fox News and every other MSM outlet.
The other day he stormed in all pissed off and was telling me how much fraud has been uncovered. I agreed and gave him an, “I told ya so.” His son who also works there was telling us, “Guys I voted for him, but he lost!” Hes an avid Fox News/CNN watcher, but not as informed. I told him he’s the perfect brain washing candidate for them because he just eats up whatever they say with no skepticism whatsoever. Nice guy, just kind of a dope sometimes.
The MSM’s efforts to demoralize TRUMP republicans is sadly having an effect, which is why it’s so important that people on here spread the news. Get your family, friends, and co-workers off of the MSM’s vice grip. It’s possible, and the more eyes you open, the healthier this country will become.
Awaken them, one at a time if you must. Good work.
Except that we saw for ourselves that a lot of the evidence came from regular people who saw something was up and crunched the numbers.
Also, does he think all those people who came forward to swear an oath to tell people about the fraud were all invited to do so by GEOTUS?
The bottom line is that if the message doesn't fit their narrative, they simply don't hear it.
Biased to the point that if their wrong it causes severe psychological trauma because they are THAT WRONG
My uncle is a cuck too. Weird cause he is a smart guy too.
Same here. My dad’s brother. Super smart, successful, hates trump. I think it’s all about appearances. And wanting to not be shunned by high society.
Most of the faculty at the university where I used to work are like that. Generally bright folks, but terrified of breaking lockstep with the rest of the ultraliberal community around them.
Arr you guys brothers?
Busting out the pirate accent early today
Kek
The fact is most people are sheep, they are followers not leaders and really don't care about much beyond their own survival and entertainment. It's made worse by a gutted education system and constant proganda indoctrinating people 24/7.
MORE STATES! MORE! LET'S GO! UNLIMITED POWER!
Which states have joined so far? I think Louisiana did last night and I heard Missouri did this morning.
No state so far, read update 4 for details on LA here: https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTuYt7R/massive-disinformation-effort-on/c/
EDIT: The president says that states are joining, and so expects them to join. None have joined thus far. Do not stop contacting your AGs, Reps, and Govs, demanding them to join the TX lawsuit and file amicus briefs, something which no state has done thus far.
The president literally just said numerous states have joined, this is outdated
Read POTUS' tweet very carefully. I also expect other states to join, none have joined thus far. Which is why it's still important to reach out to your AGs, Govs, and Reps, and demand them to join as well as file amicus briefs.
Right, he's indicating that many other states will join the case. I'm simply pointing out that no other state has joined the TX lawsuit yet, and so we shouldn't stop contacting and pressuring our AGs.
"Joining" the way it is used here indicates future tense.
Not WRONG. The moment I'm wrong, I'll update the post.
Here's the case: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
Notice how there's no additional plantiffs yet, and no other state has filled an amicus brief. Furthermore, if any state AG has joined, they would have put out a statement with the same information. While I do expect states to join, they haven't done so yet. So its not sweing disinformation, it's informing our users of what's actually happened, and so we shouldn't stop contacting our AGs damnit.
EDIT: 9 hours ago, this was true. Obviously, now we're in a much better position. Keep up the good work pedes, keep phoning your legislatures and your AGs and demand them to #FightForTrump
*sowing
Shouldn't South Dakota already be in on this?
Also, the Court hasn't REJECTED the case, it has rejected the injunctive relief! FAKE F*CKING NEWS!
That's correct. u/SellTheSun layed it out clearly, follow the thread linked at update 7: https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTuYt7R/massive-disinformation-effort-on/c/
Nope. Cruz and Levin said it is DOA.
It is like Ralph Northam saying they will make the full case nice and comfortable before they do a full abortion on it.
That's on purpose. They're conditioning people to think truth is subjective and objective truth is impossible.
PENNSYLVANIA CASE IS OVER. TED CRUZ SAID HE IS DISAPPOINTED THAT SUPREME COURT HAS DECLINED TO HEAR THE CASE
Not just refused injunctive relief. TED says they have declined to HEAR it. This info is straight from Ted.
Pennsylvania case is dead.
Texas case is still alive.
Its amazing how so many are falling for disinformation and say "this is great news, it means SCOTUS is going to hear the Texas case instead"
Cruz and Levin said the PA case is DEAD. Give that one up. You sound like Jim Carrey in "Dumb and Dumber" now.
Prove it
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1336467262975467520
Ok, that's helpful. Thanks!
But I read that Jenna Ellis says it hasn't been thrown out. So either Ted is wrong or Jenna is wrong. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/trump-attorney-jenna-ellis-supreme-court-denied-emergency-injunctive-relief-pennsylvania-case-still-pending-scotus/
Could you please further explain why the PA case is "already won" when they do the Texas case?
Similar to u/ProdigalSon1997 my current state of mind is:
Thanks for your explanation, Chest. In the meantime I read some other comments as well and now I have a better understanding than 30 minutes ago. I am really curious whether SCOTUS will take the case and how they will decide. Fingers crossed. It is a great case from Texas.
And so it was Texas who decided to save the republic
From what I've researched this morning, this is not true according to federal guidelines. Not to be a snooty Snopes douchebag but it does seem to be deboooonked
People repeat that bullshit all the time.
See you on the DC Mall on Saturday!! Let's roll!
He speaks!
This is good to hear.
GEOTUS TAKE MY ENERGY
What does intervening mean?
What powers can be utilized and to what end?
Could be wrong, but I think it just means that Trump will be adding himself/his campaign to the list of plaintiffs. President does not have any actual power over the SCOTUS
Intervene: Merriam- Webster definition 5a: to become a third party to a legal proceeding begun by others for the protection of an alleged interest.
Dems about to get gangbanged
When POTUS hits “post” on his presidential iPhone.
Are they debonking the fact states are suing? I've seen people run around with buckets on their head that seem more credible than Twatter.
I have seen a man on the subway fully retreat into his hoodie and narrate to himself the inside of his hoodie as though he were walking through a mansion
And I would take his opinion on anything more seriously than I would these fact-checkers at this point
lol 😆
I believe at this point they have it on every tweet, regardless of what he says.
Trump could say its a nice day today and Twitter would dispute it.
The level of censorship has reached its boiling point, and they are just adding more fuel to the fire.
Only one state is suing though...TX.
Tweets don't count as real support. Just a bunch of bluster but too chickenshit to formally support TX and the POTUS.
That's all they see bc that's all they're looking for. More opportunities to attack POTUS by slapping a "disputed" tag on his tweets.
I have to imagine the Law of Diminishing Returns is starting to kick in, and people are beginning to distrust those labels. Even the normies and leftists.
There is only one state suing though, TEXAS.
The others are too chickenshit to do any more than tweet.
This is it. This is the big enchilada. If this fails, it not only puts a pin in Trump's admin. It changes the country forever, even the world. They would have solidified that the US Constitution can be subverted when there is a national emergency declared. This opens up unlimited abuse of the constitution, so say goodbye to your ARs.
Hopefully all 9 of the SCOTUS judges understand that if Biden wins and the Dems pack the court, their influence lessens with every new pair of judges.
I think we all said goodbye to our ARs in those freak boating accidents last summer. Along with our S&Ws, Benellis, maybe a 50cal or two.
Yeah, most of the lakes up here are filled with lost guns. LOL!
I still have plenty if anyone needs to borrow 1.
If it fails my AR isn't leaving my hands. Day or night
That type of scenario is exactly what the AR was made for!
Shit son that two mags. With a few rounds left over.
I will not say good bye to my AR. I will use it to remind tyrants why we have the 2nd amendment in the first place.
Yep, SCOTUS will lose all legitimacy in the eyes of at least 1/3 of the country if they get this one wrong.
We won't have a Republic if they get this one wrong. Subverting the vote is the end of the grand experiment called the United States. And you know what shape the country will take if Biden succeeds - just look at any 3rd world country.
I don't think most pedes truly understand. If we can't have honest elections, we have NOTHING. It's over.
Levin was all depressed about the PA case last night and was mystified by the Court's immediate rejection of the injunction appeal, when they had made such a big deal about the case beforehand. Why suddenly reject an appeal without comment when you had made such a big deal about it? (He also predicted that the court is going to dismiss the case itself.)
Here's an explanation for the SCOTUS's behavior. The Court hadn't made up its mind. Then, at midnight a few hours before the Court would have to make up its mind, the Texas suit appeared. This suit encompasses the PA case and more, making the PA case unnecessary. So, the Court immediately dismissed the PA appeal.
This a bit on the hopium side, but it explains the inexplicable.
Mark Levin is a very smart guy, but he's a professional doomer. Have you ever heard this guy be upbeat or positive about ANYTHING?
These people you have to understand need viewership. Which of these is going to get these types more viewers over the next 4 years- A death slide into communism, or 4 years of grill and chill with daddy Trump?
I was gonna say this, but he has a lot of fans here, didn't want to stir the pot, pedes are upset enough as it is. I like Mark, but I don't listen regularly because all he does is yell.
I dont listen to him for that reason. He reminds me a little of David Knight.
Especially the fact that they denied it 9-0. That tells me they have something bigger in the works. Plus they agreed 6-3 to hear the Texas case already so that gives you an idea of how they might vote.
OH MY GOD is that #6 Justice Roberts?
Baffling the 3 of them wouldn't even want to hear it. Something is wrong with our process.
Baffling? Just look at RBG. The liberal Justices are always activists. That's what liberals do, they pollute everything they touch.
Do you have a source for that?
I haven't got through his entire show yet but he was dooming hard at the beginning. Does he change tact at some point? He sounded defeated at the start
I only caught the first hour of the show (doom.)
EDITED: Levin predicted that the Court IS going to dismiss the PA case itself.
The PA case is too PA specific to expect it to solve the problems overall. The TX case does that. Pedes have been saying for weeks, "But if we win one state, what about the others?" This filing by TX answers that. But Kelly should have filed. There should be MORE lawsuits, to bring attention to the steal. If it fails, that sucks, but it's one battle of a very big war.
I didn't see the TX case coming. They've obviously been working on it a while, and it's reasonable to believe that Rudy, Sidney, and the President knew and were sharing all their info with them. It could explain the President's confidence. If the Texas case didn't exist, I'd be really upset about Kelly's case.
You mean there is a 1% chance it will even get a hearing
Governor Northam's voice: we will make Kelly's lawsuit nice and comfortable before we do the complete abortion on it.
I could run through a brick wall right now
A coat made of dicks? I'll go give Podesta a ring....
She's a dick.....haus......mighty mighty....just letting it all hang out...
HAHAHA SAME
Has everyone here actually read the Texas lawsuit?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf
If not, this lawyer will read it with you.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/v-tb11okydc/
If you really care about the facts and want to be able to present a good argument for this lawsuit, you have an obligation to actually read this suit. If you just want to make stupid KFC memes and retarded upvote posts, then you aren't really helping.
Yes, that video of the lawyer reading the case is excellent.
That's right Mr. President, and Pedo Joe won't, one way or the other.
I choose the second one. Your terms are acceptable.
CNN has already deboooonked every Trump Tweet without even using phrases such as End of World, Armageddon, and Sky is Falling:
(CNN)The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of the commonwealth's election results, delivering a near fatal blow to the GOP's long-shot bid to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden's victory. The Supreme Court's action is a crushing loss for Trump, who has frequently touted the high court's potential to overturn his election loss. ...
"fatal blow" "crushing loss" How about just the facts?
My eyes were opened to CNN in Sept. 2000:
After Labor Day, Bush campaign had a reboot, sending GOP governors off around the country. There were 31 GOP governors, including W, so 30 planned to go. One had a family event, so only 29 of the 30 showed up on Capitol steps at press conference for kickoff. Guess what Wolf Blitzed called the fraction 29/30 ??
All but one, vast majority, almost all, ...???
"Today, a handful of Republican governors ..."
"SOARING" Covid-19 Cases is the one I'm most sick of right now
So everything boiled down to this? So you can cheat in an election as much as you want and there is no recourse except have the highest court in the land somehow overturn it. This seems a bit insane to me. At this point I don't believe anybody got elected except if they ran in opposed.
Pretty much. Vote fraud has been going on forever, they just were never this blatant, because the Dems and outside forces like Soros have been taking over the mechanisms of law and order across the country for decades, and were in position to pull this off (or so they think.)
If you think about it, this is the first time any real attention has been paid to issues with the vote since 2000. Or ever. "Go along to get along" is the mantra in DC and states - don't talk about ballot theft, because we might all lose our cushy government jobs, doncha know.
Trump is the first President to try and blow this all wide open. Because he's not part of the system/swamp. Nobody wants to believe the corruption is this deep, this firmly rooted, they want to stay in their warm, comfy bubble with their Netflix and avocado toast. That's what's pushing back the hardest - complacency.
the end is nigh
Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I personally think it might suit POTUS to not weigh in on this one, so that the SCOTUS can leave any personal biases against him to the side (at least four of them won't), and let the case be about we the people.
Any thoughts?
I'm sure all his lawyers are telling him that. His angle is public support for whatever can happen.
I agree with you! And his intervention thing worried me. Texas is in a really unique position and I don’t want any biases to undermine that. I’m sure the Sekulow’s, Ellis and Rudy will advise him correctly.
Sorry to correct you, Mr. Dr. GEOTUS, but the majority of Americans KNOW the election was rigged. Even dems know but I don't expect sociopaths to be forthcoming with the truth about their depravity.
The left went far too big with their cheating for it to be overlooked. Every state that refuses to join shows that they are ALSO GUILTY OF CHEATING and dont want to get involved. If you didnt cheat, your name needs to be on this.
Page 18. Bullet 55. Pennsylvania did not segregate all ballots received after 8PM like Justice Alito ordered. Boockvar's claim that only 10,000 ballots were received after this deadline has no way of being proven. It may be hundreds of thousands of ballots.
Yea, I don't understand the doomer mentality here. PA is a cluster fuck and I don't see how the SC can ignore
He knew this was coming and he knows what it means. Never fucking doubt this man ever love you all <3
So SCOTUS did decline PA fully? I thought yesterday it was all going well? What is happening?
NO! The case is sill live .... only the request for an immediate injunction was declined. The PA case is STILL LIVE!
Fox news is reporting the case was declined. 🤡
Ok cool, so it must still be in the works
Give that one up. SCOTUS backstabbed Kelly and the POTUS on that one
Tx is the United States angel, thank you Texas and every state joining/supporting this lawsuit
I think we need to play up the PA argument that "if you decide against us we will cause riots and violence" more in the court of public opinion.
Unless the government is afraid there will be no justice in minecraft.
Sadly the problem is both sides feel this way. The good news is trump did win and I'd bet that biden got a fraction of his "81 million votes" so there's not really much to worry about as far as civil war or whatever. The bad news is the idiot left won't actually look at any evidence or can't be reasoned with. Like how the fuck can you "disenfranchise" a voter whos dead or someone who voted 30x because of fraud? Thats just dems cheating. But the narrative will for sure be "trump stole it, this is dangerous for our democracy, this is sedition, blah blah blah"
Beyond the obvious fraud of letting dead voters vote, you disenfranchise voters when you allow for illegal elections that break election law. PA eliminating safe guards like signature verification on mailed in ballots without changing election law is the poster child for this shitshow of the 2020 election.
maybe the FAKE NEWS is refusing to report on it? duh!
[insert dinosaur meteor analogy here]
We have been waiting for the Pennsylvania Kelly case. Ted Cruz was ready to argue that case. Ted said it was a strong case. Is that case essentially gone now??
The case itself was not denied,it was just the Injunction relief that was denied.
So it is being made nice and comfortable before it gets aborted completely (Governor Northam's voice)
Praying for Trump and team to win this lawsuit
Rudy’s cases are separate? Legal filings are convoluted and annoying as fuck
Also, Sidney said she'd have several of her cases on the SCOTUS docket by end of week. Anyone have any update on those?
Sidney Powell the Q-tard grifter sucks ass
Glluuuuuhhhhhhh its DISPOOOTED!
MSNBC is STILL reporting this as “Trump’s last ditch attack on the SCOTUS and the election has failed completely”
MSNBC is a gaslighting terrorist organization.
Trump is right. Big things happening
But I thought someone on here told me only Texas was suing and not other states?
Yeah. Only TX. Where is the paperwork with any other state legally joining TX?
Sounds like we need some "Fight for TRUMP" rallies.
AMERICA.
Fuck yeah.
Can someone get me up to speed, here? The Texas case is our Last Best Hope? OR are there still Rudy or Sidney cases filed that are out there? I get the impression that we're down to only the Texas case (God bless Texas) but there MUST BE MORE....right?
This is it folks.... We're all in at this point. No way we lose. Something big is gonna drop during this, I can feel it. Someone big, I hope, has flipped.