31 No prominent Democrats have been + for COVID. Nothing suspicious there... (www.distractify.com) π· LOCKDOWN BS π· posted 128 days ago by Chuj 128 days ago by Chuj +31 / -0 6 comments share 6 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (6) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 3 ▼ – Rudyard 3 points 128 days ago +3 / -0 Nothing to see, move along or you get the hose. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – mdexile 3 points 128 days ago +3 / -0 <sarc> This just proves that masks work. democRATS=masks=no WuFlu</sarc> permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Trumpdidit 3 points 128 days ago +3 / -0 I noticed this month's ago, and the tread is still in affect. Prove us wrong. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – GreenScreen 2 points 128 days ago +2 / -0 I think that's because covid1984 is a human disease. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – WinkingPede 2 points 128 days ago +2 / -0 π₯π₯π₯Ouch!!!!π₯π₯π₯ Maybe the answer lies within these historical documents, V. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – half-blacktrump 2 points 128 days ago +2 / -0 I bet they have and just didn't have any symptoms so their office said "they've been on close contact with someone so they are quarantining for 2 weeks" Technically true and no MSM to question it permalink save report block reply
Nothing to see, move along or you get the hose.
<sarc> This just proves that masks work. democRATS=masks=no WuFlu</sarc>
I noticed this month's ago, and the tread is still in affect. Prove us wrong.
I think that's because covid1984 is a human disease.
π₯π₯π₯Ouch!!!!π₯π₯π₯
Maybe the answer lies within these historical documents, V.
I bet they have and just didn't have any symptoms so their office said "they've been on close contact with someone so they are quarantining for 2 weeks"
Technically true and no MSM to question it