3658
Comments (170)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
217
GordonHeavyfoot 217 points ago +218 / -1

Interesting they make no mention of rumble, bitchute, parler, gab, etc but go straight to the the other commie platforms.

73
CitizenPlain 73 points ago +74 / -1

Yeah, I don't understand why they wouldn't at least do both.

42
y_do_i_need_to_hide 42 points ago +42 / -0

It's the live streaming aspect.

30
Im_Not_Rattled 30 points ago +30 / -0

Then DLive would be a good platform to stream on.

-61
deleted -61 points ago +2 / -63
22
mugwump 22 points ago +22 / -0

You can use it as a buttplug, glowfag.

14
404michiru 14 points ago +14 / -0

Deport this idiot

8
Juantinntwo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Damn, these bot comments are like whack a mole. You gotta smack that downvote on each of them as soon as they pop up.

6
MAGA_or_GTFO 6 points ago +6 / -0

@trooper5565

bot bot bot

commie libtard faggot bot

bad bot

deport

43
Slavik777 43 points ago +43 / -0

I suspect in about oh a week or two, they will be saying the same sad goodbyes to Fakebook and Twatter. People never learn.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
23
Rocks_vs_Uzis 23 points ago +23 / -0

Dlive does

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
2
TrappedinDC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Salty is on DLive now due to YouTube timeout and will now be on DLive full time with new YT 1984 rules. He’s at over 500,000 subscribers on YT.

7
Slavik777 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well, I didnt know that so good point. At the very least they could start hosting their videos on other platforms and mention that they will.

25
50red 25 points ago +27 / -2

Because they need audience and a platform that can handle the traffic.

17
PhantomShield72 17 points ago +17 / -0

-implying they will be given unfettered access to both after the precedent set by youtube

6
50red 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's a stop gap solution, yeah.

8
TacticalKeyboard 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have no reason to think rumble can’t handle the traffic. They have been solid from what I’ve seen

4
50red 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not too familiar with rumble. Can they do live streams?

Video can get very costly. To sustain it Rumble will need to sell ads. To sell ads they will need to approach a wider range of companies which might not want to advertise on a "hurr durr alt-right breitbart youtube." See how the damn leftist system works?..

3
prospektor 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. Then the SJW outrage mob will target payment processors, so these platforms are cut off from revenue altogether and even from paying their bills, as long as said mob doesn't target the ISPs, anyway. This is also why we need to organize protests against any company implementing such measures instead of just retreating further and further into the shadows, where it gets increasingly easy for that mob to get people cancelled, as less and less people will care about it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
meanwhileinamerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing Azure can't hanlde

8
nanowerx 8 points ago +8 / -0

They said specifically they are starting accounts on some of those, but that most of them don't allow live streaming, including Rumble.

5
KRM944 5 points ago +5 / -0

I could be wrong- but I’m not sure Rumble can support the live-streaming they need. I just asked the CEO of rumble on Viva Frei YouTube livestream- they didn’t take my superchat