3658
Comments (170)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
25
50red 25 points ago +27 / -2

Because they need audience and a platform that can handle the traffic.

17
PhantomShield72 17 points ago +17 / -0

-implying they will be given unfettered access to both after the precedent set by youtube

6
50red 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's a stop gap solution, yeah.

8
TacticalKeyboard 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have no reason to think rumble can’t handle the traffic. They have been solid from what I’ve seen

4
50red 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not too familiar with rumble. Can they do live streams?

Video can get very costly. To sustain it Rumble will need to sell ads. To sell ads they will need to approach a wider range of companies which might not want to advertise on a "hurr durr alt-right breitbart youtube." See how the damn leftist system works?..

3
prospektor 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. Then the SJW outrage mob will target payment processors, so these platforms are cut off from revenue altogether and even from paying their bills, as long as said mob doesn't target the ISPs, anyway. This is also why we need to organize protests against any company implementing such measures instead of just retreating further and further into the shadows, where it gets increasingly easy for that mob to get people cancelled, as less and less people will care about it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
meanwhileinamerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing Azure can't hanlde