I'm sitting here, trying to wrap my head around everything that's going on.
the law says that any disputes must be settled 6 days before the electors meet. Electors will meet on the 14th, so the deadline was on the 8th. The dispute was initiated before the deadline but injunction was denied, so the dispute was not settled before the 8th.
Because the injunction was denied and we are now past the 8th, and the matter wasn't even seen in court yet, it would seem that the dispute has not been settled before the 8th, therefore, it would seem that our case is in danger.
How do we get around this one?
In short: SCOTUS and the legislatire can clean ignore this simply by saying "fuck that rule". On top of that, the rush to deny cases, and the fact that they openly violated their own rules, means they are likely to get shit on in court.
Safe harbor means nil if the election is contested.
Is there a law that says this that no one is talking about?
The actual safe harbor law.
Oh really? So if SCOTUS decides that this case has merit and is contesting the election, then safe harbor goes out the window?
Yes.