the problem is that, as far as I know, no court of law in any of the disputed states has yet agreed to rule on the merits - that being the process of actually examining the evidence of fraud presented.
(in some cases, the evidence has been presented to the court in attempt to justify going forward with the case, but there is a big difference between 'here is my analysis' and 'okay, lets go through it and see if its valid')
You can have all the evidence in the world, but if no legal authority will hear you out, you officially haven't proven anything as far legitimate legal process is concerned.
if he knew better why wasn’t he getting in contact with them or better yet taking over the lawsuit?
you have a point there, and I am trying to keep in mind the wide chasm between the people willing to pound sand in arena and spectators on the stands.
Whatever is said about their performance and capability, these 3 are actually trying. However this turns out, I am going to remember that.
the problem is that, as far as I know, no court of law in any of the disputed states has yet agreed to rule on the merits - that being the process of actually examining the evidence of fraud presented.
(in some cases, the evidence has been presented to the court in attempt to justify going forward with the case, but there is a big difference between 'here is my analysis' and 'okay, lets go through it and see if its valid')
You can have all the evidence in the world, but if no legal authority will hear you out, you officially haven't proven anything as far legitimate legal process is concerned.
you have a point there, and I am trying to keep in mind the wide chasm between the people willing to pound sand in arena and spectators on the stands.
Whatever is said about their performance and capability, these 3 are actually trying. However this turns out, I am going to remember that.