Yea not every person is sexually compatible with the other. In fact some find that out quickly after getting married and then get a divorce shortly after.
Those rules for Christianity were formed before 'courtship' was even a thing. When the process of marriage involves more haggling with the parents than talking to the future spouse, makes sense not to have sex.
But given how radically different modern coupling is, the sex rule makes very little sense now.
I'm not sure what you mean by "normalization," but dating has certainly been around a lot longer than 100 years. And in the 1950s, interestingly nobody bought the "try it before you buy it" mentality that seems to have spread like a plague. The loosening morals you describe were brought about by the social programming of the 1960s, the so-called "sexual revolution," which was a communist psychological operation targeting the nuclear family and the core structure of the Western family. Sadly, many Americans, even "right wingers" accepted it as an organic "development" of social mores, and decided to swallow the jagged blue pill that declared morals as nothing more than Darwinian social norms subject to gradual and even rapid evaporation and change.
i think what attacked the 'nuclear family' was primarily feminism + push for economic system where it takes multiple incomes to own a home and feed your family.
Kids need a lot of attention. They need a mother at home, looking after them and providing early education that's critical at age 2+.
Kids need a lot of attention. They need a mother at home, looking after them and providing early education that's critical at age 2+.
There you go again proving my point. Normalized pre-marital sex has been one of the leading factors in the explosion of single-parent households. You're not wrong about feminism, unless you believe the existence of feminism reduces the problem to a single cause.
And if you had ever driven anything but whores . . . ooops, I mean Yugos, you'd know you aren't allowed to test drive a find automobile before buying it.
There is no way this is real and he hasn't found out, it's literally a public post on social media.
I'm not buying this is a trap judging by the face only
Looks like a young girl to me. If that's a dude well played, you fooled me.
mentally remove the hair and add a buzzcut haircut.
Paging Lola.
C
O
L
A
Cola.
Murder Suicide?
I wonder why trans people keep getting beat up. 🤔 🧐 🤨
Fake as fuck
Faster divorces only happened in Vegas.
Is that a roll of nickels in your pocket, Senka?
Ancient and gay but still good
japanese cartoon term. Male crossdressers good enough at it to pass for female
Fake and gay
If true - this will NOT END WELL
It's a TRAP boy 🤣
lol
I see you anon
The article continued by saying that she's not a complete prude they still played "Just the Tips"
Fucking morons. No sex before marriage is like buying a car you never test drove. Not a good idea.
Unfortunately, your comment perfectly reflects the absolute success of the cultural indoctrination the left has forced on the Christian West.
Yea not every person is sexually compatible with the other. In fact some find that out quickly after getting married and then get a divorce shortly after.
Those rules for Christianity were formed before 'courtship' was even a thing. When the process of marriage involves more haggling with the parents than talking to the future spouse, makes sense not to have sex.
But given how radically different modern coupling is, the sex rule makes very little sense now.
You realize that you're proving my point, or no?
don't think so.
Young people 'dating' as a cultural practice - was that the left pushing that in US?
Far as I know it was normalized in America in the 50s. (and was followed by a decade of loosening morals)
Fornication was pushed by the marxist left with the intent of destroying the family. Yes.
I admire the brevity and accuracy of this resonse.
I'm not sure what you mean by "normalization," but dating has certainly been around a lot longer than 100 years. And in the 1950s, interestingly nobody bought the "try it before you buy it" mentality that seems to have spread like a plague. The loosening morals you describe were brought about by the social programming of the 1960s, the so-called "sexual revolution," which was a communist psychological operation targeting the nuclear family and the core structure of the Western family. Sadly, many Americans, even "right wingers" accepted it as an organic "development" of social mores, and decided to swallow the jagged blue pill that declared morals as nothing more than Darwinian social norms subject to gradual and even rapid evaporation and change.
i think what attacked the 'nuclear family' was primarily feminism + push for economic system where it takes multiple incomes to own a home and feed your family.
Kids need a lot of attention. They need a mother at home, looking after them and providing early education that's critical at age 2+.
Any career will be at expense of motherhood.
There you go again proving my point. Normalized pre-marital sex has been one of the leading factors in the explosion of single-parent households. You're not wrong about feminism, unless you believe the existence of feminism reduces the problem to a single cause.
And if you had ever driven anything but whores . . . ooops, I mean Yugos, you'd know you aren't allowed to test drive a find automobile before buying it.
Also I wanted to mention I do have a wife just so you know.
Well, it's not a test now- drive her like you want to make babies great again. :)
Bullshit yes you are allowed to test drive fine automobile. Normally for exotics and what not there is a process of payment before a test drive.
I don't know who the fuck you think you are but I imagine you take the bus cause you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about.