posted ago by Fuchtard
+2858 / -3
We must put maximum pressure on the Republican legislatures in the swing states to do the right thing.
We must put maximum pressure on the Republican legislatures in the swing states to do the right thing.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Gotta keep em demoralized
OP's post isn't wrong though, as soon as SCOTUS says the election wasn't legit, the media will begin a massive narrative that Trump and a partisan SCOTUS are trying to steal Biden's rightful Presidency, riots will begin, as much fear as possible will be sown that if Biden doesn't get in, it's fascist dictatorship, to pressure the state legislatures into cucking anyway.
We have to be ready for that and apply just as much pressure.
That isn’t the only option - SCOTUS could rule that the elections in those states were unconstitutional and nullify their electoral votes. No one gets 270 and it winds up in Congress.
Not American here, but I suspect legislators won’t have the balls to send Trump electors. My bet would be that they will declare that winner is unknown and refuse to send electors. This is still good outcome and Joe can’t have 270
I do fear they will just vote Biden anyway. Killing the Republican Party forever and ushering in Democrat power for the rest of this country’s existence.
Until the next day, when POTUS drops the hammer to save the Republic.
This will end up in congress.
I think the only way to handle this is to void the electoral votes from the states that violated the constitution/engaged in fraud and to send election to the House delegation. Imagine a scenario where state legislatures are of a different party than the president that is seeking re-election. Those state legislatures violate the laws of their own state constitution and then are able to void the election process and then pick the president that they want. Transferring the right to vote back to a legislature at this point gives the legislature of a few states too much power. On top of that, they're all cucks.
👆
INSURRECTION - do it now!!!!!!
Trump really should. I wonder if he will if SCOTUS cucks out? One would think he would use it then as that would be the last resort.
If the SCOTUS cucks out, every red state should literally send 270 voters because what GA/PA/MI/WI did was a clear constitutional violation and no opinion/dismissal literally means the U.S. Constitution is worth less than COVID toilet paper.
On 12/18 the Foreign Interference report is due per his 2018 EO, so maybe then if SCOTUS fucks our assholes.
I think that is the deadline. “The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.” Ratcliffe, Pompeo, Chris Miller, Chad Wolf all get involved.
Glad somebody gets it. We don't know if that's what SCOTUS will do, but it's one possibility. Contingent election is another. Anybody thinking this YouTube decision is meaningless because us conservatives will just move to a new platform and the market will decide and it only hurts YouTube is naïve or a glowfag.
If it comes down to state legislatures single votes then they are required to vote along party lines
I don't think that's true.
Why would it be true? How is "the party line" decided? You don't even have to be registered to a party to be a legislator or presidential candidate.
I've just never seen a law backing such a claim up. On the other hand if the law is cited I will gladly admit being wrong.
https://www.270towin.com/content/electoral-college-ties/
Thank you. Unless they are also unaware of the law, that backs up what I'm saying.
We all know that already.
It may not be I could be conflating us Congress contingent elections with another election clause
Wait a minute, it’s already in the hands of the legislatures and they’ve proven unwilling to act.
I think the answer is that the SCOTUS will rule that they have to select their electors based on constitutionally legal votes. Not sure.
I would think that Scotus would be unlikely to let the legislatures pick a new slate of electors. In the future this may encourage a state to commit fraud if the state legislature is the same party as the president but the people of the state have voted to selected a candidate of the opposing party.
I think they'll just disqualify all of the states that have run fraudulent/unconstitutional elections so that no candidate can get to 270, there's no future incentive to cheat then, and a house delegation will select the president.
Exactly. No-one wants to be the one 'responsible' for overturning the fraudulently-certified 'count'. So it'll stand and the EC will vote based on it because the SCOTUS cucks and the GOP 'legislator' cucks are more afraid of BLM/Antifa than they are of US.
Ideally, if SCOTUS takes this course, they will void the current electors. The state can then select their own slate, or if not, then Biden may not have 270 and it goes to the House. But even there, whose to say what the House RINOs will do, but I'd rather take my chances than with these state legislators.
It's their job. They need to be repeatedly beat about the head and shoulders until they do their damn job!
THIS IS EXACTLY CORRECT
This has to be treason. At a minimum sedition.
Do I even need to say it? Section 230. Gone. NOW.
Don't forget that if they delete Section 230, then Rumble, TDW, and other sites you like will be at risk of being sued. So maybe the better approach is to let Youtube, Google, Twitter, become total silos like the New York Times. No one except the Dem loyalists give a f___ what the NYT says anymore since it so clearly a political mouthpiece only.
I do have concerns that if/when it gets to that point, libs are going to go hardcore offensive against those select few legislatures to get them to bend. 'Choose Biden or we know where you live' kind of stuff. If YouTube/Twitter/et. al. are suppressing any info, the only in-their-face oemn they have is that mob of people picketting outside their house.
I hope the Legislators are able to overcome what I imagine are infinitely stressful odds aimed not only at them but families and do the right thing and bring the votes for Trump. They will 1000% need need support and solidarity from this community if it comes to that to show that they aren't alone in this fight.
FUCK COMMIE PROPAGANDA
Haha, jokes on them. Legislatures shall vote the party line. No exceptions. Does Trump look worried?
-edit I mistakenly thought this was a US SC invalidates election then it goes to the house of reps. Article 2 type thing. But, the fact they denied the PA case injunction. Says to me, they are gonna use Texas as an original case, to draw in all the rest of the litigation AND all that evidence. Typically, new evidence can't be submitted to the US SC.
I mean honestly, kicking them back down. Having the cases play out with all sorts of fuckery. Then, appeal up to US SC, basically having a bunch of little reruns in front of the US SC as an appellate court of all these lower court cases. Just doesn't make sense.
Have one big case, originate it in US SC, draw in as many of these lower cases as you like. As any live non-appealed case, get all that evidence when, how and where you want. Much better.
This is what I'm hoping for and if it has to go-to Article 2, that's a foregone conclusion...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163234/20201209155327055_No.%2022O155%20Original%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf
And now they hop onto a case originating in SCOTUS. Bringing all the evidence they want, w/o any obfuscation by lower courts.
yes i found this out today. i was worried about political fuckery
President Trumps second term starts in Jan 2021 one way or another.. I'm not worried about that part but it will be interesting to see how the media spins it. haha
President Trump holds all the cards and he is not worried about this either because knows he starts his second term in Jan 2021 too.
It's going to Scotus. Not the TX supreme court.
Actually youtube is preparing for with the American media for President Trump's 2020 election victory being made official. So they're trying to hide any mentions of it so when it comes the narrative will be "WAIT they can't do that, President Trump. the republicans and Scotus took our right ot vote away" then the rioting starts.
That is what the whole youtubee thing is about.. They know they've lost already so they are just preparing to push more riots..
I think SCOTUS should just exclude all 4 States from the vote total due to fraud and let Congress pick the next President which President Trump wins hands down. because each state gets only one vote and Republicans out number dems.
Good call. Most likely getting ready for blowback.
It's great to know that people will have access to truthful reporting from ABC, NBC, CBS, and others on YouTube when they have questions.
More like to prevent the masses from knowing the truth, with the hope that they will riot when they feel Trump somehow "stole" it in the dead of night.
You know the state legislatures in all these states are republican and are almost certain to vote Trump unless they want their careers to end? I am in PA and I'll be calling every one of these assholes to make sure they know what they need to do and I'll do it daily if I get blown off.
IF CUCK LEGISLATORS ARE GOING TO CHOOSE THE ELECTORS , THEN WE NEED TO RADICALIZE !
Everyone here has a lot of faith in scotus. Right now they’re getting threatened by deep state actors that if they delegitimize Biden a war will start so they see that trump supporters are “quiet” and will have outrage but will die down as they can’t do much cause too much is in the line.
I assume SCOTUS would act in their best interest, but we can’t know exactly what that best interest is. One possibility is that a Biden Presidency would lead to their irrelevance by way of stacking the court, and we can assume they wouldn’t want that. Another possibility is that they are afraid for their lives and will act accordingly, regardless of their duties.
And be ready to get out on the streets. Antifa is going to be out trying to intimidate everyone into submission - it's gonna be time to go do some damage to these fuckers. We must not let them control the narrative on this. I don't care if we look like "trouble makers". That's their whole thing, and it never stops them getting what they want. This time, we need to beat their asses down or we lose the country.
He's talking about the relief after SCOTUS rules in our favor.
Shit, they want a civil war.
Like any of these states have a choice if they dont qant all out bloodshed and a country ripped apart like never before seen. I am ready to fight.
They say people who have been in battle know better than to ask for it. I find a lot of wisdom behind this saying. But I wonder how people who have been in battle feel about this? There has to be a line.
I also acknowledge that a civil war is exactly what China(and other would want), maybe even part of a plan(paging yuri bezmenov). But say nothing, its over anyways. Kind of lose/lose
Very good point Pede
I thought if a state was suing another state it's SCOTUS jurisdiction only?
I don't think YouTube based this on the texas case specifically, and nobody - especially not us - should take the result of the case for granted.
That said, yes, the censorship is a bet that things will shake out in their favor.
Well knowing how milquetoast most of the Republicans are, it is a pretty good plan on their part.
Got rid of youtube today. This was the last straw. I used to listen at work for the background play. Heard from a couple cool pedes here about the bitslide app for bitchute. Has almost everyone I listen to on it ; also it has background play! Good riddance youtube. Commie ass sacks of fuck.
Time for arrests
So, Trump ends up winning nearly the entire left completely off guard, which gives maximum ripeness, perfect for salt mining, and Big Tech goes full in for interference with election, Section 230 is revoked, and then we get executions of traitors... Looking forward!