Haha, jokes on them. Legislatures shall vote the party line. No exceptions. Does Trump look worried?
-edit I mistakenly thought this was a US SC invalidates election then it goes to the house of reps. Article 2 type thing. But, the fact they denied the PA case injunction. Says to me, they are gonna use Texas as an original case, to draw in all the rest of the litigation AND all that evidence. Typically, new evidence can't be submitted to the US SC.
I mean honestly, kicking them back down. Having the cases play out with all sorts of fuckery. Then, appeal up to US SC, basically having a bunch of little reruns in front of the US SC as an appellate court of all these lower court cases. Just doesn't make sense.
Have one big case, originate it in US SC, draw in as many of these lower cases as you like. As any live non-appealed case, get all that evidence when, how and where you want. Much better.
This is what I'm hoping for and if it has to go-to Article 2, that's a foregone conclusion...
Haha, jokes on them. Legislatures shall vote the party line. No exceptions. Does Trump look worried?
-edit I mistakenly thought this was a US SC invalidates election then it goes to the house of reps. Article 2 type thing. But, the fact they denied the PA case injunction. Says to me, they are gonna use Texas as an original case, to draw in all the rest of the litigation AND all that evidence. Typically, new evidence can't be submitted to the US SC.
I mean honestly, kicking them back down. Having the cases play out with all sorts of fuckery. Then, appeal up to US SC, basically having a bunch of little reruns in front of the US SC as an appellate court of all these lower court cases. Just doesn't make sense.
Have one big case, originate it in US SC, draw in as many of these lower cases as you like. As any live non-appealed case, get all that evidence when, how and where you want. Much better.
This is what I'm hoping for and if it has to go-to Article 2, that's a foregone conclusion...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163234/20201209155327055_No.%2022O155%20Original%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf
And now they hop onto a case originating in SCOTUS. Bringing all the evidence they want, w/o any obfuscation by lower courts.
yes i found this out today. i was worried about political fuckery