Yes, they actually do. If it is repealed, the only ones who will be able to exist in a sea of litigation are those already established as tech giants with endless investor cash and judges in their pockets. All small websites will be drowned in this sea of litigation, and that includes this one.
Decentralized platforms is the natural evolution. Adapt or die. Big Tech won't win in the end; ie. they were able to take down Napster but they couldn't take down Torrents.
230 is just keeping everything status quo and Big Tech immunity, small websites are already drowning in a sea of monopoly.
No. 230 is designed to prevent what the tecnofascists are doing, but it simply is not being enforced. If it is removed, all sites that allow "wrongthink" (i.e: anything right of Mao) will be sued out of existence.
For those not familiar with Section 230 of the Tellecommunications act of 1934 (aka the "Communications Decency Act of 1996"), this single clause is what the technofascist pricks use to shut down all speech that they don't like. Remove that single line, or define it in precise terms allowing freedom of expression, and their stranglehold on Free Speech is GONE.
Maybe all centralized websites, not decentralized platforms.
From what I understand there's decentralized platforms on ZeroNet which I haven't looked into yet. Also in TOR. Time to build more decentralized platforms and for them to grow, and be adopted.
If you really think 230 enforcement will save everything, let me ask you this: If the federal laws around snail mail tampering is more serious and enforced than 230, how come snail mail laws didn't prevent the mail in ballot fiasco?
It's clear the future has to be encryption and decentralization systems. Try to defeat encryption, nobody effectively can. Try to take down the Torrent or Cryptocurrencies' platform, they can't effectively.
Yes, they actually do. If it is repealed, the only ones who will be able to exist in a sea of litigation are those already established as tech giants with endless investor cash and judges in their pockets. All small websites will be drowned in this sea of litigation, and that includes this one.
Decentralized platforms is the natural evolution. Adapt or die. Big Tech won't win in the end; ie. they were able to take down Napster but they couldn't take down Torrents.
230 is just keeping everything status quo and Big Tech immunity, small websites are already drowning in a sea of monopoly.
No. 230 is designed to prevent what the tecnofascists are doing, but it simply is not being enforced. If it is removed, all sites that allow "wrongthink" (i.e: anything right of Mao) will be sued out of existence.
For those not familiar with Section 230 of the Tellecommunications act of 1934 (aka the "Communications Decency Act of 1996"), this single clause is what the technofascist pricks use to shut down all speech that they don't like. Remove that single line, or define it in precise terms allowing freedom of expression, and their stranglehold on Free Speech is GONE.
https://i.ibb.co/fDbbCTJ/Section-230-Otherwsie-Objectionable-Clause.jpg
Maybe all centralized websites, not decentralized platforms.
From what I understand there's decentralized platforms on ZeroNet which I haven't looked into yet. Also in TOR. Time to build more decentralized platforms and for them to grow, and be adopted.
If you really think 230 enforcement will save everything, let me ask you this: If the federal laws around snail mail tampering is more serious and enforced than 230, how come snail mail laws didn't prevent the mail in ballot fiasco?
It's clear the future has to be encryption and decentralization systems. Try to defeat encryption, nobody effectively can. Try to take down the Torrent or Cryptocurrencies' platform, they can't effectively.