20
Comments (6)
sorted by:
1
Scalpmaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can anyone tell me why it's better for him to get involved? Sometimes when mom is yelling at Dad for being a dick to you, it's best to let her win that fight for you.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Brillica 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff in Intervention respectfully request that this Court issue the following relief:

A. Declare that Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause.

B. Declare that any Electoral College votes cast by such Electors appointed in the Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are in violation of the Electors Clause and cannot be counted.

C. Enjoin Defendant States and their respective officials from using the constitutionally-infirm 2020 election results for the office of President to appoint Electors to the Electoral College, unless the legislatures of Defendant States review the 2020 election results and decide by legislative resolution to use those results in a manner to be determined by the legislatures that is consistent with the Constitution.

D. If any of the Defendant States have already appointed Electors to the Electoral College using the 2020 election results, direct that such States’ legislatures, pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 and U.S. CONST. art. II, §1, cl. 2, have the authority to appoint a new set of Electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause, or to appoint no Electors at all.

E. Award costs to Plaintiff in Intervention.

F. Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Sounds reasonable to me!

1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any lawyer pede hanging around to explain what that means?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
LirukDatan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you!