7689
Comments (684)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
Center1296 11 points ago +11 / -0

What am I looking at? Red states have joined the lawsuit?

11
Atldtw 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes, correct. Blue are contested.

6
patataoh 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why do certain people on here still say that these states have not technically joined??

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
rgsmith66 5 points ago +5 / -0

Something like, until SCotUS accepts the case, the additional states can't officially join... but I think they're filing separately with the intent of combining with Texas' suit (like a class action suit) assuming SCotUS does accept it. But I don't have all the details... that's just my understanding at the moment. I'm still reading... :)

2
Trudict 2 points ago +2 / -0

At this point, I think the Scotus not accepting it is just as bad, if not worse than any of the other outcomes.

It is 100% a question that deserves an answer.

4
Joebidenisacriminal 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are trying to demoralize you. More states will join

4
chlofefe 4 points ago +5 / -1

It officially happened about an hour ago

3
Drunkard 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have filed an amicus brief in support of Texas. These are sometimes referred to as "friend of the court" in the media.

From google:

Amicus Curiae. Literally, friend of the court. A person with strong interest in or views on the subject matter of an action, but not a party to the action, may petition the court for permission to file a brief, ostensibly on behalf of a party but actually to suggest a rationale consistent with its own views.

I think people just want to be factually correct and accurate with the terminology.