5276
Comments (121)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
hansgruber7 9 points ago +9 / -0

But shouldn't the Attorney General be prosecuting the fraud?

14
AtariArtist 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's going to the AZ Supreme too - lotta stuff happening here.

10
Doth 10 points ago +10 / -0

One thing at a time. For now, what matters is we rang that motherfucker's phone off the hook today and he responded by dropping trow with these actions.

I have my eye on him to replace Governor Ducey.

2
mty_green_go 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. The attorney general represents the state and is employed by the state.

It's like If you do something shady and your lawyer on retainer tries to investigate you and throw you to the wolves. That's not how it works

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

But a lot of the fraud happened at the local level, like in Maricopa county. Wouldn't the Attorney General have the authority to prosecute fraud there?

1
mty_green_go 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be honest I don't know, I want to say yes. Normally the FBI would get involved in those kinds of things at city/county/state level corruption but we all know current FBI is extremely corrupted

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, which is why the State Attorney General becomes even more important, since we can't count on the FBI.