Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Highjacking again for visibility, sorry this is important pedes, especially when we could have SCOTUS decisions as early as tomorrow Democrat SCOTUS contingency plan
Which is why the PA lawsuit is so important. The PA lawsuit has potential to deny the Dems majority in the House.
(Which can be worse in a way, because there can be a stalemate for speaker, for example if both inside have less than 218. No speaker, no electoral college at all)
Did their contingency plan take into account Texas and the 17+ states that are suing? I know they war gamed this back in September when they thought Warren would get the nomination. They also thought that Trump would win Pennsylvania by only 20,000, when in reality he won it by over 700,000 lol. Just curious on how successful they've been at predicting the scenarios. I skimmed through some of it but I'm no legal expert so I didn't understand a lot of it
I personally think they all underestimated again. We shouldn't underestimate the dems, this was all planned, but they also underestimated trumps vote turnout... AGAIN! They couldn't fathom that Trump would increase his vote counts in every single state during his 2nd campaign. They thought shitting on him in media would be enough to stop his popularity from going up. They were WRONG.
They made the steal way too obvious. 5 States stopped counting simultaneously with over 93% of votes counted, and Trump was winning each state by over 100K votes (700K in Pennsylvania), only to lose his entire lead the next morning while they kicked out GOP poll watchers and boarded up windows. What I can't figure out yet was if they did this in plain sight so boldly to laugh in our faces, or if they really are that fucking stupid that they wouldn't think this would rouse suspicion.
They had no choice, they were under time pressure and had to go all-out in order to make up for Trump's huge lead. Subtle wasn't going to let them fake that many votes.
Also, the people actually doing the physical rigging weren't exactly criminal masterminds - not talking about the brightest bulbs on the tree here.
No it definitely hasn’t proceeded according to plan for them all the way, and I believe they’ve had to revise some of their plans to adapt, but the issue is that they have a plan already for when SCOTUS grants relief to the plaintiff Texas, which involves sending their own defecting electors regardless of SCOTUS rule, forcing a constitutional crisis or contingent election. But even that I think will be moot now. The real goal now based on how things have happened IMO is the period they demarcated from Jan 6th to the 20th. And that is to drag things out indefinitely with challenges until their is no determination by the 20th. Then, using other judicial actions filed simultaneously as the one to rule on the presidency, they will force the court to rule in their favor on the parallel case they filed, and in that ruling will have to acknowledge Pelosi as president based on the ruling they used. They will then use this to seize control of the military. This is explained better in Part C of the SCOTUS section of the document, page 348
Do you think there is a counterplan to this from Trump? I thought this would be decided by 1 representative from each state (Republicans have the majority) and Trump would get his 2nd term. Also, if there is evidence of foreign interference, and of Biden being compromised by China, how does that play out?
Trump playing the long game. This election was under Trump’s Sep. 12, 2018 executive order to protect integrity of the elections. It really helps out a lot if your opponent thinks your an idiot/ dumbass.
I think that’s where we will see the teeth of the executive order he signed in 2018 come into play, in regards to Chinas interference and Biden being compromised. So how does one of the craziest times in living history sound for a Christmas present?
Hey Porkbut, I haven't read your link yet but I'll make sure to do so. Thank you.
What you may not realize yet is that worrying about downvotes is what makes Reddit the leftist sewer it is. Real Americans like you and me just don't care about conforming enough to get unanimous approval. So you posted your info, and some people will like it and some people won't. You did your best, and I'm sure you reached a few good people. After all, you got some upvotes!
Do not despair Fren, i know how you feel sometimes we all feel like we have some info that we must share with everyone!
And i also agree that is what the dems will try to do, unlike many pedes here i dont buy the story that they are all retarded thats just their pawns..
If you ask me you should all be prepared because in the war games the dems enacted this year one of the possible outcomes of the election was:
Trump declines to concede and they go for secession of blue states, after that they ask UNs help to depose trump... Also theres no way for us to be 100% sure the military is on Trumps side at all in the higher ups they are most likely neocons to the bone.
So yes pedes pray for trump and the rule of law but be ready!!! At least stockpile some food and water , worst case you will be eating lots of caned food and carbs in the future...
I don't think "people" necessarily includes noncitizens. It can vary. For example "People's Republic of China" does not imply that the "Republic of China" is possessed by non-citizen people.
At this point, with the testimonies and analyses coming from AZ, NV, GA, PA, WI, and MI, can anyone say with certainty that these kind of shenanigans weren't happening elsewhere?
Even in D.C., the local elections are probably rigged to "help" preferred candidates to win their races. Although the presidential race is most likely clean; that place is a Democrat stronghold.
Different types of shenanigans - the four States in question had illegal systematic rule changes which went against the will of their respective Legislatures. Arizona and Nevada, AFAIK, didn't have such changes which can be brought before SCOTUS... even if there were irregularities, they weren't widespread corruption.
I did see a license plate with a paper taped over it - but coming off on the freeway, I was behind it- looked up the vin # and it was a car from Mexico. Also a black jeep with a license plate painted black, and a homemade grill painted black. I am assuming that is a car and Jeep from Mexico, because there- you are allowed to Macguiver a car, give it a road warrior make-over and drive it on the road.
Foreign Nationals are driving on US freeways with plates and South American cars they are altering.
Where is our CIA?
Where is our FBI?
Even though we pay them- They don't appear to work for us anymore.
You looked up the vin number while behind it on the freeway, minotaurbeach? You must have incredible eyesight. where did you read the vin number from? The dash? The engine block?
California is RED, those racist fucking Dems think they got a strangle hold on anyone that isnt white...I was out there camping for Thanksgiving with a big group 40ppl camp, half of them Mexicans and I'd say 90% were for Trump.
That is what I was wondering. Maybe there is some fraud, but they did not make changes to the voting rules outside of the legislature which is the bases of the suit.
Hell Biden gathering the most votes in history while simultaneously losing the most counties in history should really be a big tip off. And he underperformed Hillary and 0bama II in every other metropolitan area except for four. Guess which four. Hint: it's the four you think it is.
Don't forget SharpieGate. That was willful and intentional on their part. And as far as I know, none of those ballots was considered important enough to cure before certifying the election. HMM.
Word on the street in AZ is that he wants to run for governor when Ducey's term is up in 2022. Problem is, the week after the election he went on Neil Cavuto to say that he doesn't see any evidence of election fraud.
So maybe his recent change of heart is because he's been run through the mud for weeks and he sees his political career coming to end. Fine, but we've got our eye on you...
True. Maybe his hands are tied by process, legislature, and/or other politicians. Maybe SCOTUS is the stronger path forward given how close we are to Inauguration.
Read the filing - he's not on our side. Nothing he says really indicates he's supporting Texas, only that he wants to give his opinion on the matter and he doesn't think the SC should have jurisdiction. Do not trust this man.
It’s good to be optimistic and excited about stuff like this, but so many people on this site will trust some random person tweeting shit out. Cant complain about Reddit’s misinformation while we’re posting false info ourselves, gotta be accurate with everything
As it had not been confirmed, it was disinfo at the time.
People think that their state had already joined, they stop calling. People stop calling, states are not pressured to join. We would be shooting ourselves in the foot.
People need to know the truth, not just what makes us happy.
As it stands, I am very happy with this outcome. So many more stepped up than was predicted! People are really stepping up and engaging with their government officials, and it is making a difference.
Well last night it WAS. Somebody jumped the gun. The claim actually came true later, but at the time they were saying it hadn't happened, it hadn't happened yet.
They aren't plaintiffs; but they are lending their services and support to the plaintiff... I think. I read somewhere that you can't "join" a SCOTUS case; so this might be the best they can do.
The filing and is statement don't particularly indicate any real level of support for Texas. He only states that he wants to file an opinion on the matter. Until he uses stronger language than what's in that filing, or in his statement I'm going to skeptical of this.
Once we get another several States to sign on - signifying a majority of those remaining which aren't named in the suit - that's when the winning will really begin.
Yeah, I think he anticipated that concern with the official statement. In particular: "Arizona wasn't named in this lawsuit because our office successfully prevented many of the same troubling and last-minute changes to our state's election integrity laws."
The word choice is interesting..."successfully prevented" suggests there were attempts to do so and it was stopped.
Arizona still has some friendly legislature and a few others on our side. Arizona is also not charged with any constitutional issues so they don't have to defend this charge. We still have to remember and cleanup the massive amount of fraud in the state, but that can happen after we win.
believe it or not - Arizona is full of patriots. It's one of the most libertarian states with one of the best gun laws (ie constitutional carry, ban on background checks between private party gun
sales, etc). Unfortunately, we have a lot of RINO politicians, which needs to end.
Seems a little weird but I don't see why not, especially if you are saying that the changes in the rules at the state level damaged your counties ability to be represented in the state vote.
You know what I wish - I wish we residents could sue our legislators for putting us in this mess. For example - I live in Bucks County Pa. I voted for Wendi Thomas, a republican in our state house who won re-election. She and other republicans in bucks "claim" they did not sign the letter (the one with 76 legislators on it) asking for a special session. In fact she won't comment at all on this. She's a republican who won by riding on Trumps coattails - and the people that voted her in also voted for trump. These RINO's need to be sued as well - for disenfranchising their constituents and not abiding by the constitution of the state - not allowing US to vote on Act 77, which is how it should have been done. Its outrageous. Bucks County was red for 3 days after the election - and it was stolen. We are the reddest of the philly burbs, and these RINO's here think they need to pander to democrats.
How would that work? I honestly dont know, I'm not a lawyer pede.
The Texas lawsuit is against these state, so who is the defense on behalf of these states? Is it the AG or appointed in an adhoc fashion by their governors per their state constitution?
If it is, would the AG be responsible for speaking to the passing or ignoring of election laws in their own state, which they have nothing to do with?
If they aren't, why not join the lawsuit against their own state as a FU for putting them in that position?
19 including Texas. 19 States are suing 4 others. That would be breaking news on every channel if we weren't living through 1984. Has anything similar ever happened, aside from the Civil War anyway?
2% of ballots from a 100 ballot sample had a votes altered and removed
6% of signatures from 100 ballot sample were problematic - Republican Witness
9% of signatures from 100 ballot sample were problematic - Democrat Witness
2,000 ballots were duplicated by officials while denying access for Observers.
"A person is not required to submit proof of citizenship" - Voter Registration
300,000 Fake People Voted In Arizona Election
yup, but fraud is separate from the Constitutional issues. We didn't make any last minute changes to our election laws that are contrary to either the AZ or the Constitution. It's just that the demonrats engaged in fraud, like they probably did in ever city in the country.
This is great to see. There are good people in all of those states who are fighting to straighten out this election. Good people dont want to see their state go down the drain because of a few elected and unelected officials rushing everything thru for ulterior reasons.
AZ didn't have a constitutional issue like the other 4. They have their fraud going on but it's not because of governors and supreme courts fucking with thier election laws and state constitution.
"our office successfully prevented many of the same troubling and last-minute changes to our state's election integrity laws."
I'm pretty sure the people currently suing and the Trump campaigns recent 11 HOUR public hearing on election fraud in AZ kind of disagree with ya, Mark.
While this is awesome they have not joined the suit they are supporting the suit thats very different. Now good news is if SCOTUS accepts the case then I do expect more states to join as plaintiffs.
Yeah, but isn't Arizona guilty of shady dealings, too?
we will get to that later after the second term is confirmed
Fair enough.
Highjacking again for visibility, sorry this is important pedes, especially when we could have SCOTUS decisions as early as tomorrow Democrat SCOTUS contingency plan
Which is why the PA lawsuit is so important. The PA lawsuit has potential to deny the Dems majority in the House.
(Which can be worse in a way, because there can be a stalemate for speaker, for example if both inside have less than 218. No speaker, no electoral college at all)
PA is going to go a lot slower than TX hate to break it to you. TX get's precedence by nature of SCOTUS being the only court able to provide redress.
PA and 3 other states. Not PA exclusively.
Did their contingency plan take into account Texas and the 17+ states that are suing? I know they war gamed this back in September when they thought Warren would get the nomination. They also thought that Trump would win Pennsylvania by only 20,000, when in reality he won it by over 700,000 lol. Just curious on how successful they've been at predicting the scenarios. I skimmed through some of it but I'm no legal expert so I didn't understand a lot of it
I personally think they all underestimated again. We shouldn't underestimate the dems, this was all planned, but they also underestimated trumps vote turnout... AGAIN! They couldn't fathom that Trump would increase his vote counts in every single state during his 2nd campaign. They thought shitting on him in media would be enough to stop his popularity from going up. They were WRONG.
They made the steal way too obvious. 5 States stopped counting simultaneously with over 93% of votes counted, and Trump was winning each state by over 100K votes (700K in Pennsylvania), only to lose his entire lead the next morning while they kicked out GOP poll watchers and boarded up windows. What I can't figure out yet was if they did this in plain sight so boldly to laugh in our faces, or if they really are that fucking stupid that they wouldn't think this would rouse suspicion.
They had no choice, they were under time pressure and had to go all-out in order to make up for Trump's huge lead. Subtle wasn't going to let them fake that many votes.
Also, the people actually doing the physical rigging weren't exactly criminal masterminds - not talking about the brightest bulbs on the tree here.
No it definitely hasn’t proceeded according to plan for them all the way, and I believe they’ve had to revise some of their plans to adapt, but the issue is that they have a plan already for when SCOTUS grants relief to the plaintiff Texas, which involves sending their own defecting electors regardless of SCOTUS rule, forcing a constitutional crisis or contingent election. But even that I think will be moot now. The real goal now based on how things have happened IMO is the period they demarcated from Jan 6th to the 20th. And that is to drag things out indefinitely with challenges until their is no determination by the 20th. Then, using other judicial actions filed simultaneously as the one to rule on the presidency, they will force the court to rule in their favor on the parallel case they filed, and in that ruling will have to acknowledge Pelosi as president based on the ruling they used. They will then use this to seize control of the military. This is explained better in Part C of the SCOTUS section of the document, page 348
Do you think there is a counterplan to this from Trump? I thought this would be decided by 1 representative from each state (Republicans have the majority) and Trump would get his 2nd term. Also, if there is evidence of foreign interference, and of Biden being compromised by China, how does that play out?
Trump playing the long game. This election was under Trump’s Sep. 12, 2018 executive order to protect integrity of the elections. It really helps out a lot if your opponent thinks your an idiot/ dumbass.
I think that’s where we will see the teeth of the executive order he signed in 2018 come into play, in regards to Chinas interference and Biden being compromised. So how does one of the craziest times in living history sound for a Christmas present?
Roberts is a Bush appointee.
Maybe because you are spamming every thread with this info and because the thread you cite has very little info in it? Just my guesses.
What do you have in mind? I have been concerned about these things as well.
Without you spamming I never would have seen that playbook. Ive heard it mentioned a few times but could never find the actual playbook. So thank you.
Hey Porkbut, I haven't read your link yet but I'll make sure to do so. Thank you.
What you may not realize yet is that worrying about downvotes is what makes Reddit the leftist sewer it is. Real Americans like you and me just don't care about conforming enough to get unanimous approval. So you posted your info, and some people will like it and some people won't. You did your best, and I'm sure you reached a few good people. After all, you got some upvotes!
Do not despair Fren, i know how you feel sometimes we all feel like we have some info that we must share with everyone! And i also agree that is what the dems will try to do, unlike many pedes here i dont buy the story that they are all retarded thats just their pawns.. If you ask me you should all be prepared because in the war games the dems enacted this year one of the possible outcomes of the election was:
So yes pedes pray for trump and the rule of law but be ready!!! At least stockpile some food and water , worst case you will be eating lots of caned food and carbs in the future...
Downdoot for crying so much and makin TD look weak. I dont even know what u posted.
I don’t care about the downdoots, read my post please. The information is important. https://thedonald.win/p/11QlYXqJrY/mods-please-sticky-this-has-all-/
Thank you for proving my point
No tiny chyna faggot.
Taiwan #1
Chyna #3
YEAH TAIWAN NUMBA 1!!!
BIG TIME!!
The Iron Sheik says you're wrong:
"IRAN, NUMBER ONE!"
Fuck off
Let me speak to you in your home language Ching Chang Chong.
这是一个美国委员会，您是愚蠢的黄色混蛋，滚蛋，并告诉小熊维尼他可以吃一块巨大的鸡眼，为了人类的进步而自杀。
Fucking asshole. My amateur ass keeps clicking
Brother you should know better by now. You've been on the internet for how long?
@pauljoneshh768
bot bot bot
bad commie bot
deport with prejudice
bot traffic increasing.....we are over target pedes!
Investigate EVERYWHERE. I assure you that there are shady things happening in CA, too.
I’ve been reading the CA election law code..
First thing it says is ‘people’ can vote... doesn’t mention citizens!
I don't think "people" necessarily includes noncitizens. It can vary. For example "People's Republic of China" does not imply that the "Republic of China" is possessed by non-citizen people.
The problem with California is that they have legalised FRAUD
Yeah, we gonna have to dig them out like tics.
I wonder how close CA is when counting legal votes. Trump could win it.
My country in nor Cal donated 10 times more $ to President Trump but he lost the election. Nothing to see here.
At this point, with the testimonies and analyses coming from AZ, NV, GA, PA, WI, and MI, can anyone say with certainty that these kind of shenanigans weren't happening elsewhere?
Even in D.C., the local elections are probably rigged to "help" preferred candidates to win their races. Although the presidential race is most likely clean; that place is a Democrat stronghold.
Different types of shenanigans - the four States in question had illegal systematic rule changes which went against the will of their respective Legislatures. Arizona and Nevada, AFAIK, didn't have such changes which can be brought before SCOTUS... even if there were irregularities, they weren't widespread corruption.
100%
I did see a license plate with a paper taped over it - but coming off on the freeway, I was behind it- looked up the vin # and it was a car from Mexico. Also a black jeep with a license plate painted black, and a homemade grill painted black. I am assuming that is a car and Jeep from Mexico, because there- you are allowed to Macguiver a car, give it a road warrior make-over and drive it on the road.
Foreign Nationals are driving on US freeways with plates and South American cars they are altering.
Where is our CIA?
Where is our FBI?
Even though we pay them- They don't appear to work for us anymore.
You looked up the vin number while behind it on the freeway, minotaurbeach? You must have incredible eyesight. where did you read the vin number from? The dash? The engine block?
You can look up cars by licenseplate, and find where they are from, and if they have the right plates.
License plates are registered to people and addresses-It was a non-US Plate
OMG dude, does your disinfo job even pay?
And then we must get California.
If we do manage to get a second Trump term, the election system must be fixed once and for all.
No more voting "machines" or much if any "electronic transfer", paper ballots, and Voter ID.
And we need to forbid the practice of having on the ballot the two who got most votes in their primaries.
In California the Demonrats need to only cheat in their own primaries to win Congress
How about tabulators that only count in INTEGERS and not fucking FRACTIONS?
Brother, I will accept a man with an abacus and nothing more at this point. Also the abacus has to be for decorative purposes.
California is RED, those racist fucking Dems think they got a strangle hold on anyone that isnt white...I was out there camping for Thanksgiving with a big group 40ppl camp, half of them Mexicans and I'd say 90% were for Trump.
Yes please. Let's make CA red again.
Most of that was Katie Hobbs who is a lesbo commie and Doug Doushey who is a McCainiac RINO.
Bows not the time for fear, that comes later.
That is what I was wondering. Maybe there is some fraud, but they did not make changes to the voting rules outside of the legislature which is the bases of the suit.
Pennsylvania broke my heart on Election Night.
Had that huge lead. And then taken away by Philly Crime Machine.
Hell Biden gathering the most votes in history while simultaneously losing the most counties in history should really be a big tip off. And he underperformed Hillary and 0bama II in every other metropolitan area except for four. Guess which four. Hint: it's the four you think it is.
He's talking about AZ
I agree. The defendant states conducted elections against the Constitution and their own laws. Arizona may have been just sloppy.
Don't forget SharpieGate. That was willful and intentional on their part. And as far as I know, none of those ballots was considered important enough to cure before certifying the election. HMM.
I wonder if Kelly actually won.
it's a guarantee he did not
Yeah, but not of the variety the other states are being sued for, which is not adhering to their own state election laws.
"Our office has received many inquiries"
Well done everyone. Keep up the great work!
My first thought aswell.
Actively Conservative.
That should be the new standard for Judge nominations.
I know my message wasnt the deciding factor, but it's nice to be part of the effort.
DRAGON WINERGY LETS GO!
The Donald is actually making a difference
And biden and harris will be eating Clarence Thomas' shit.
The old saying goes "Kill them with kindness. When that doesn't work, ram it down their fucking throat."
We need common sense liberal control
Looks like someone left a pube on your ballots Joseph
When we win this I hope Clarence tweets that.
A just ruling will be a oh so sweet payback to racist Biden.
The piece of shit was a traitor since Vietnam.
No, a bowl of Hell Dicks!
Oh he is and enjoying every second of it.
Shit McStain
Ummm....but az needs to fix their shit too.
AG seems to be the least cucked high position
Yup. I'll take this small victory.
Word on the street in AZ is that he wants to run for governor when Ducey's term is up in 2022. Problem is, the week after the election he went on Neil Cavuto to say that he doesn't see any evidence of election fraud.
So maybe his recent change of heart is because he's been run through the mud for weeks and he sees his political career coming to end. Fine, but we've got our eye on you...
Mark's alarm clock is a big grift-o-meter that tells him which way he should lean that day.
Attorney General =/= The morons who conducted the fraudulent election in Arizona.
Which us actually kinda nice if you ask me!
Cries in Josh Shapiro.
Maybe he should investigate the fraud then...
True. Maybe his hands are tied by process, legislature, and/or other politicians. Maybe SCOTUS is the stronger path forward given how close we are to Inauguration.
Doesn’t the AG get to investigate that shit
Read the filing - he's not on our side. Nothing he says really indicates he's supporting Texas, only that he wants to give his opinion on the matter and he doesn't think the SC should have jurisdiction. Do not trust this man.
Lol imagine if they joined as a defendant
I hate to brag, but I did call him yesterday! Yah fucking hoo!
Thank you pede
Brag all you want!! THANK YOU!!!
Thank you fren!
same!!!
Appreciated!
Brag away👍
Mods jumped in on it too. That was stupid imo
I think they were just urging caution. The site gets trolled so much that sometimes it's warranted. It's all confirmed now.
Some people weren't urging caution, but claiming Jenna Ellis would have egg on her face, she was dead wrong and none of this was going to happen.
Why? It was not confirmed until this morning.
I agree. I jumped the gun like a lot of people.
It’s good to be optimistic and excited about stuff like this, but so many people on this site will trust some random person tweeting shit out. Cant complain about Reddit’s misinformation while we’re posting false info ourselves, gotta be accurate with everything
As it had not been confirmed, it was disinfo at the time.
People think that their state had already joined, they stop calling. People stop calling, states are not pressured to join. We would be shooting ourselves in the foot.
People need to know the truth, not just what makes us happy.
As it stands, I am very happy with this outcome. So many more stepped up than was predicted! People are really stepping up and engaging with their government officials, and it is making a difference.
Now, can we get an even 25 states to join?
....yeaaahhhh.....no
Yup.
Your mother is a therapists couch.
When that post was stickied, wasn't it not yet confirmed?
Well last night it WAS. Somebody jumped the gun. The claim actually came true later, but at the time they were saying it hadn't happened, it hadn't happened yet.
Its gotta be tough to be a mod on this site. I give them props and understand mistakes happen. These are crazy times
What if other states hadn't jumped on? We'd all look like fools.
Hell, people were gonna call them LESS if they thought they were already onboard.
I don't blame people. Legal language and procedure is complicated, and anything involving the supreme court seems to add on to it.
I still don't know if filing an amicus brief is the same thing as "joining the lawsuit".
Are these states plaintiffs too now, or did they just gave a letter of support?
They aren't plaintiffs; but they are lending their services and support to the plaintiff... I think. I read somewhere that you can't "join" a SCOTUS case; so this might be the best they can do.
The info on disinfo was the disinfo! cuckception!
It a riddle, locked in a puzzle, wrapped in an enigma!
The filing and is statement don't particularly indicate any real level of support for Texas. He only states that he wants to file an opinion on the matter. Until he uses stronger language than what's in that filing, or in his statement I'm going to skeptical of this.
She's wounded, but still willing to fight gentlemen. Go AZ!!!
She's going to come back with a roar, I can feel it!!
Moisturizer and an occasional re-hydrating beverage might be of more help.
Once we get another several States to sign on - signifying a majority of those remaining which aren't named in the suit - that's when the winning will really begin.
Why isn't Arizona a defendent?
They had a ton of fraud but apparently it didn't involve bypassing legislatures
Correct ^^ This is also why NV isn't listed. They did change their laws, but used the legislature to do it.
Which is really just more proof that PA WI MI GA fucked up, that you can point to NV and say "they did the wrong thing, but at least did it legally".
Yeah, I think he anticipated that concern with the official statement. In particular: "Arizona wasn't named in this lawsuit because our office successfully prevented many of the same troubling and last-minute changes to our state's election integrity laws."
The word choice is interesting..."successfully prevented" suggests there were attempts to do so and it was stopped.
The suit is not about fraud. Arizona didn't do anything with the constitutional issue in question.
I would imagine something is happening in Arizona were they don't think they needed to sue them
Is this some sort of sick joke?
Arizona still has some friendly legislature and a few others on our side. Arizona is also not charged with any constitutional issues so they don't have to defend this charge. We still have to remember and cleanup the massive amount of fraud in the state, but that can happen after we win.
believe it or not - Arizona is full of patriots. It's one of the most libertarian states with one of the best gun laws (ie constitutional carry, ban on background checks between private party gun sales, etc). Unfortunately, we have a lot of RINO politicians, which needs to end.
People have been ignoring local elections for too long. That’s what happened in AZ.
someone should go tell reddit that the Texas lawsuit now has bi-partisan support across party lines.
'Blue states are getting on board. Who is next? Hawaii? California?'
People like you made a difference.
PLAYER 19 AS ENTERED THE BATTLE
HEHEHEHEEHEHE - GIGGLING INTERNALLY THE LAST FEW HRS HEHEHE
WE ALL KNOW IT DIDN'T.
NO WAY, all aboard the TRUMP TRAIN!
Let’s go Arizona. Redeem yourselves.
Such a big deal.
We need the PA and GA counties next.
Seems a little weird but I don't see why not, especially if you are saying that the changes in the rules at the state level damaged your counties ability to be represented in the state vote.
You know what I wish - I wish we residents could sue our legislators for putting us in this mess. For example - I live in Bucks County Pa. I voted for Wendi Thomas, a republican in our state house who won re-election. She and other republicans in bucks "claim" they did not sign the letter (the one with 76 legislators on it) asking for a special session. In fact she won't comment at all on this. She's a republican who won by riding on Trumps coattails - and the people that voted her in also voted for trump. These RINO's need to be sued as well - for disenfranchising their constituents and not abiding by the constitution of the state - not allowing US to vote on Act 77, which is how it should have been done. Its outrageous. Bucks County was red for 3 days after the election - and it was stolen. We are the reddest of the philly burbs, and these RINO's here think they need to pander to democrats.
From a michigan pede in a red county, who would I begin to contact to make that happen?
I would think your county District Attorney. It would be interesting to get a group of county DAs from these areas to join the suit or make their own.
calling works. give energy to kentucky now
Hang in there pede, its always darkest before the Don! 🇺🇸🗽
Thank you, Arizona! That was the easy part. Now root out the fraud and corruption in your state and return Arizona to Trump!
Please please save our nation
Maricopa County is not the entire state. I don't think it's an attempt at redemption.
I'm convinced Maricopa stayed red, despite the commiefornians, Sharpiegate, and 'digital adjudication' of early ballots.
FWIW, Maricopa is 60% of the state.
Fuck yeah. AZ! Fuck yeah!
Direct link to their filing w/ SCOTUS: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf
Weak ass statement, but they did join, nonetheless.
I've got an Arizona bone-uh
Remember when Jesus said “remove the log out of your own eye before telling your brother to remove the speck from his?”
Could the AGs of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, or Wisconsin join in on the suit against their own state? Would be hilarious.
How would that work? I honestly dont know, I'm not a lawyer pede.
The Texas lawsuit is against these state, so who is the defense on behalf of these states? Is it the AG or appointed in an adhoc fashion by their governors per their state constitution?
If it is, would the AG be responsible for speaking to the passing or ignoring of election laws in their own state, which they have nothing to do with?
If they aren't, why not join the lawsuit against their own state as a FU for putting them in that position?
Does that make 18? 😎
19 including Texas. 19 States are suing 4 others. That would be breaking news on every channel if we weren't living through 1984. Has anything similar ever happened, aside from the Civil War anyway?
Isn't this state one of the fucky fraudulent ones?
2% of ballots from a 100 ballot sample had a votes altered and removed 6% of signatures from 100 ballot sample were problematic - Republican Witness 9% of signatures from 100 ballot sample were problematic - Democrat Witness 2,000 ballots were duplicated by officials while denying access for Observers. "A person is not required to submit proof of citizenship" - Voter Registration 300,000 Fake People Voted In Arizona Election
Right.
BUT... they didn't try and make up new laws without their legislature. They just fucking sucked at enforcing the ones they had.
yup, but fraud is separate from the Constitutional issues. We didn't make any last minute changes to our election laws that are contrary to either the AZ or the Constitution. It's just that the demonrats engaged in fraud, like they probably did in ever city in the country.
Good point. There is a clear distinction.
My state AZ allegedly a fully blue state now, yet here we are joining TX is this suit. Everyone here knows our election was fraudulant.
Clean up your own state while your at it!
After.
After this, if Trump is confirmed the winner.... We collectively here at TD are going to organize, push for, and demand federal election reforms.
And we're going to win because there are going to be so many pissed off Dems that it'll sail through.
Arizona should investigate themselves while they're at it.
This is great to see. There are good people in all of those states who are fighting to straighten out this election. Good people dont want to see their state go down the drain because of a few elected and unelected officials rushing everything thru for ulterior reasons.
Wait, wasn't the same shit going on in AZ? So, is GA joining next?
Georgia's "Republicans" are worse than Democrats.
Georgia is all around shit. They produced Florida-Georgia Line or whatever that fucking pop band is called.
AZ didn't have a constitutional issue like the other 4. They have their fraud going on but it's not because of governors and supreme courts fucking with thier election laws and state constitution.
ic... that makes more sense now.
Arizona's fraud wasn't a state-level issue; it was concentrated in certain counties. Arizona didn't alter their rules by executive decree.
I'm pretty sure the people currently suing and the Trump campaigns recent 11 HOUR public hearing on election fraud in AZ kind of disagree with ya, Mark.
While this is awesome they have not joined the suit they are supporting the suit thats very different. Now good news is if SCOTUS accepts the case then I do expect more states to join as plaintiffs.
Shouldn't AZ fix their own shit before galivanting around?
You’re all welcome. It’s because I sent him an email. Lol
BRNOVICH ONLY DID THIS BECAUSE WE BLEW UP HIS PHONES... HE'S A NEVER TRUMPER JUST LIKE OUR TWO FACED GOVENOR...