LANSING, MI -- The Michigan Supreme Court won’t order an audit, nor will it seize ballots and block officials from certifying the already-certified presidential election.
In a split ruling issued Wednesday, the majority said the state’s highest court doesn’t have the power to do so and according to the opinion written by Elizabeth T. Clement, entertaining arguments on the topic would only “prolong the uncertainty over the legal
To summarize.
State supreme courts have the power to change election laws in favor of leftists. State supreme courts don't have the power to change election laws or even accept cases based on elections if the results would favor conservatives.
Then. Who. The. Fuck. Does?
The takeaway from all of this is that if you cheat big enough it doesn't matter if you get caught. Too Big To Fail political style!
Can't help but wonder, though, if they are trying to provoke rioting.
I think they are - it would be their dreams come true if we get stuck in a multi-year internal fight (dare I say Civil War II). That's why I'm hoping the SC route works out. Having said that, if Trump calls for us to cross the Rubicon, then I'm gonna cross that river and drain that swamp military tribunal style.
"Entertaining arguments on the topic would only “prolong the uncertainty""?????? #Since when is making people wait a reason to not follow due process?????????
I’m mean I don’t understand what is there job if ensuring a fair election isn’t on the list. So fricken aggravated- I know it’s commie talk but Greg Jarrett said this is exactly what will happen to the Texas case on hannity radio on the drive home. Are we being duped?
OP, is this the Texas+18 state lawsuit?
That’s what he said, Supreme Court is still upset about being involved with bush v. Gore in 2000. They don’t want to be involved in highly political cases or something along those lines.
Okay, this isn't a good sign. But it's going towards the main SCOTUS, if they decide to hear it out, but this is unfortunate, period.