7973
Comments (1029)
sorted by:
896
neehl 896 points ago +904 / -8

CNN SAID YOU COULDN’T SEE THIS VIDEO! DO NOT WATCH! IT’S ILLEGAL!!!

339
AngeredKabar 339 points ago +339 / -0

Oh no. That sucks.

258
deleted 258 points ago +258 / -0
227
CubanitoLopez 227 points ago +228 / -1

Yeah this is a violation of election integrity. Trump needs to sign an EO and seize all these machines. It's gone too far

72
murph1953 72 points ago +73 / -1

Amen

-385
Trump_in_2020_Pedes -385 points ago +18 / -403

I'm not watching a video that is vertical because the people that made it/uploaded are that stupid. It's too painful for me to watch. Try again.

Oops: And it got removed. Suck a big nut!

Update: THey deleted your gay video! Did ums get your feefees hurt? :P

192
Civilizedbutpushinit 192 points ago +193 / -1

Yeaaa you should take your “needs and requirements” and eat go eat a bag of dicks. Where’s your perfect video exposing fraud?

Either your a commie or a prick

45
MagaMattyIc3 45 points ago +45 / -0

Xim/Xer could be both....commie and prick

41
AbortSocialMedia 41 points ago +41 / -0

this piece of dogshit doesn't even know who seth rich is. throw him over the fucking wall, you know the button.

16
deleted 16 points ago +21 / -5
60
Pepbrandt 60 points ago +62 / -2

And those stupid founding fathers wrote in calligraphy. Way too hard to read!

23
Formygrandchildren 23 points ago +23 / -0

Why do you think schools no longer teach cursive? So future generations can’t read the Constitution and Declaration of Independence!

7
irritating_logician 7 points ago +7 / -0

LOL. I love this comment! Is that why Libtard Justices are always like, "I wonder what they meant by this part of the constitution."?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-5
deleted -5 points ago +3 / -8
45
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
chingtok 3 points ago +3 / -0

What software did you use, and did you use any tutorial?

3
MorpheusKnows 3 points ago +3 / -0

THANK YOU! Plus now we have a link that we can SHARE!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
28
deleted 28 points ago +31 / -3
-125
Trump_in_2020_Pedes -125 points ago +4 / -129

Suck a fat dick, homo.

-125
Trump_in_2020_Pedes -125 points ago +5 / -130

Suck a fat dick, homo.

14
Samdog 14 points ago +16 / -2

Youre going to be a real benefit when shit hits the fan and life becomes real uncomfortable.

-66
deleted -66 points ago +6 / -72
51
NYC_4_Trump 51 points ago +51 / -0

Ballots should be hand counted. Have an army of vote counters, vetted by both sides, hand counting every ballot throughout the day. I’m talking upwards of 100 people per voting site.

Ballots go to 3 teams.

1st team counts and send it to 2nd team. If their count is more than 1% different than 1st team, it goes to third team.

For anyone who says “That will take too much time” let me remind you: NYS didn’t finalize election results until last week.

35
realityman 35 points ago +35 / -0

The solution is actually very simple - too simple. The Democrats will never agree to it because their party is built upon fraud.

But here is the solution anyways:

There is a national holiday every year for elections. It is the first Tuesday of November. All Americans are given the day off work. This is the only day you are permitted to vote, and voting must be done in person. Absentee voting is permitted with a valid excuse, and those votes must arrive to the polls by election day. All voters must present a valid voting id, and each vote must return a receipt to the voter and a receipt to be kept by the polling place - a paper trail.

11
craigccfl 11 points ago +11 / -0

With a finger or thumb print.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
JimmyJam 7 points ago +7 / -0

1st Tuesday after the 1st Monday*

3
ZeroDeltaTango 3 points ago +3 / -0

That rule is so weird. WE DON'T WANT YOU FUCKERS VOTING ON NOV. 1, DAMMIT, EVEN IF IT'S THE FIRST DAMN TUESDAY OF THE MONTH!!! YOU GOTTA WAIT ANOTHER WEEK! WHO CARES IF JAN. 20 IS FAST APPROACHING?

Ya gotta wonder how that rule ever got introduced, what was the reasoning? "People will be too hung over from partying on Halloween"? Or WTF??

7
BigBadJim 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've been saying that since GWB.

14
Trump4Eternity 14 points ago +14 / -0

This will NEVER happen in the current United Banana Republics of America. We need a second revolution for that

14
OGTD1 14 points ago +14 / -0

And if a voter is so retarded that they bubble in two candidates for one race it does not count. JFC I bet it happens all the time.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
6
zooty 6 points ago +6 / -0

There should be absolutely none of this "curing" bullshit. You fuck up, you fuck up.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
7
NomadicKrow2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah. I don't know why this isn't the case. We have four entire years to prepare.

22
Carry_Your_Name 22 points ago +22 / -0

Dominion = "Do, minion!" It's an open mockery of We the People.

15
Shakakka99 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yeah this is a violation of election integrity.

YA THINK!??!??!??

5
JSpartan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Absolutely

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
26
lawyerpede93 26 points ago +26 / -0

Agree 100% with this.

Leave vulnerabilities and the TDS people who have been brainwashed into thinking Trump is the literal devil will do the rest out of misguided patriotism (or the promise of free shit)

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
Returningtogod 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lois Lerner anyone?

8
AndrewLB 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lois Lerner was directed to do what she did by the white house.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
zooty 3 points ago +3 / -0

All through this year, the riots have provided a handy pool of people that demonstrably have little respect for the law.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
6
Fdbog 6 points ago +6 / -0

In Canada we have a pretty slick system to deal with overvoting like this. If you admit you messed up they can void the ballet in front of you and assign a new one.

If you don't admit or realize and cast an overmarked ballet it goes into the disqualified pile, your vote don't count.

3
Clandestiny 3 points ago +3 / -0

🤡🌍🇨🇳

13
LoobintheToobin 13 points ago +13 / -0

Nothing to see here... moveon.org But we won reeeeeeeeeeeee

4
Forte 4 points ago +7 / -3

Only a very small pool of people should be able to perform some of those actions. Like, 1 or 2 per county.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
5
Anti-Turncoat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Should.

39
Infectedblood 39 points ago +39 / -0

My freakin eyes!! What should I do? Brian Stelter help me please!!!! Wolf, Wolf Blitzer.........

19
neehl 19 points ago +19 / -0

Too late for you, off to the gulag you go

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
WhyWhyWhyWhyWhy 4 points ago +4 / -0

User: Evan has entered the chat.

4
NomadicKrow2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Evan on the fly!

-74
deleted -74 points ago +2 / -76
15
hotdogsforsale 15 points ago +15 / -0

FUCK OFF SHILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

6
MAGACARTA_333 6 points ago +6 / -0

been seeing this SpamBoy all day

11
Azill 11 points ago +11 / -0

This guy has been doing this for multiple days, why is he not IP banned from this site?

12
TheGreenDutchman 12 points ago +12 / -0

Who says he hasn't been? Do you know how piss easy it is to get a new IP? You pay 5 bucks for a VPN and have tons of them at the click of a button. Hell, some people can just reset their router and get a new one.

4
LoobintheToobin 4 points ago +4 / -0

But does it fit my 50 cal?

95
errydaktal 95 points ago +95 / -0

It just goes to show how inaccurate the results could be because think about how many corrupt election officials there are sitting in a room alone

65
deleted 65 points ago +66 / -1
24
PezzShivers [S] 24 points ago +24 / -0

Longer version? That's almost 3mins shorter. I took those two videos from twitter and cut out the parts I thought weren't very important and spliced them together.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
14
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
SixTree 13 points ago +13 / -0

Edit: never mind I was able to download the originals. Thank you so much for posting this. I've actually been trying to get a close up of the machines used in the Georgia security footage. I'm thinking, this is it.

This particular machine isn't in the dominion training videos which are available to the public. I've been trying to track down the small white rectangular object that was very suspiciously passed from Ruby to Shae Moss, and then slipped into the jacket guys pocket.

I think it may be one of these: https://www.gbsvote.com/store/icp-flash-memory-card

But I am trying to figure out which machines they are used in. These cards are specific (I think) to image cast precinct, ICP ballots drop into a container though. Still digging.

11
PezzShivers [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

If you're trying to download the videos here you go.

ONLY CLICK THESE LINKS IF YOU WANT TO DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL VIDEOS. THESE PARTICULAR LINKS WILL NOT TAKE YOU TO YOUTUBE

1.https://m.youtubepp.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=46CAKyyObls

2.https://m.youtubepp.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ijjwS6h-PyU

After clicking the link, scroll down the page and select the quality/size of video you want and hit download.

9
SixTree 9 points ago +9 / -0

Already got them pede, thanks again.

And I believe I found the machine...

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1466945-REG/canon_3150c002_imageformula_dr_g2110_document_scanner.html

...But its just a cannon document scanner after all... you posting this helped me out a ton, because from the Georgia "suitcase" video I could not make out the machines in detail.

Gotta move further up the chain now to the ICC system

3
PezzShivers [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey that looks a lot like it! Dominion makes all kinds of machines and stuff but really the important part is the dominion software. They probably have an approved list of scanners you can use bc that scanner and software were working hand in hand together.

5
PezzShivers [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

You talking about that USB drive thing she palmed?

If you're talking about a card of some sort then it might be the "Key card" that only 1 or 2 people are supposed to have that lets you access part of the machines/software that other people aren't allowed to access. If I understood it right. its just like a little encrypted card that acts as a key. Kind of like one people use to get into certain places at work that are locked.(where you just have to scan your badge over a little thing) or kind of like a hotel key card that instead or inserting/sliding you just swipe it over an area.

Edit: Could be wrong through. Someone shared a video and the key things looked kind of circular on a lanyard thing

4
SixTree 4 points ago +4 / -0

yeah, the object from the shady handoff.

The security keys are like circular buttons on a keychain looking lanyard, but they might take other forms as well. Dominion is a mess of proprietary hardware, software, and generic equipment from other companies (ie the cannon scanner).

The cards in the video come out of specific Dominion made tabulator/scanner combos. BUT who says you need to take it out of a tabulator, you can probably just get one on the side and plug it right into EMS/RTR - which is where they end up once you take them out of the tabulators.

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I saw that little circular key lanyard thing right after I made this comment in a little video

3
Deaf_MAGA_Pede 3 points ago +3 / -0

They still use these flash cards? I thought they were outdated?

The CompactFlash is small and the daughter's hand looks quite normal, if not big, for a woman and she seemed like she had a hard time trying to conceal it.

https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-hand-holding-compact-flash-memory-card-isolate-white-background-image70515673

When I first saw what was being hidden, I immediately thought of something similar to this one:

https://www.silicon.pk/shop/computer-addons/usb-flash-drive-with-voice-recorder-8gb/

I had one similar to the link with the butt or the nose, however you call it, sticking out. Mine was white (butt/nose frame) and the whole body was black. That's what it looked like to me and it's quite big and rectangular. That could be it?

4
SixTree 4 points ago +4 / -0

They claim to have their own encrypted cards, yeah.

https://www.dominionvoting.com/training/rtr/index.html

See 3:45

But these cards only come out of specific machines, I think. They are for voting person. Single ballots are tabulated on the spot, as they are turned in, and then dropped into a bin. These machines don't seem intended for mass tabulation in batches.

https://www.dominionvoting.com/training/ice-movie_2/index.html

See 1:20

LOL - Plug in a MODEM @ 1:40

iTs nOt On tHe iNtErNeT yooGUISE

Edit: I've got the handoff frame by frame and zoomed in hard in my video editor, its a white square/rectangle. Its only really visible in a few frames. Part of what other people think they are seeing, in my opinion, is part of her bracelet.

2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

also. That machine is a tabulator plus a ballot marking device. They can place a stack of 50 blank ballots and have them all filled in and voted for Joe Biden within seconds and they will all be dropped into the ballot bin just like any other ballot. No way to tell the difference

2
OconusLurex 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would you be able to share one of those zoomed frames? What does the white square/rectangle resemble? I've not been able to zoom in enough to see the differentiation between the item and bracelet, or get a sense of what the item could be.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
LoobintheToobin 12 points ago +12 / -0

The depth of depravity knows no bounds. I wonder how far back one would have to go to find a “free and fair” election. Perhaps new state is really blue.

5
InRevelation12now 5 points ago +5 / -0

Election cheating has been with us for a long time. It has taken this current massive election conspiracy to wake us up and realize how bad it has become. Now we need to take back our country by any and all means necessary.

6
electioninfection 6 points ago +6 / -0

Especially when a lot of these dipshits are public sector union.

4
InRevelation12now 4 points ago +4 / -0

This vid reveals more ways electronic voting machines can be used to cheat. People responsible for selecting and purchasing these voting systems intentionally spent our tax $$ to buy equipment to control us. They and all the rest of the election fraudsters are enemies of 'we the people'.

A lot of the focus is on DVS, but because of how horrible DVS is, all electronic voting systems cannot be trusted. I agree with many who have already said this: We must revert to hand counting paper ballots with lots of oversight everywhere in this country. I will volunteer to watch. I find this cheating repugnant.

44
Xanisor 44 points ago +44 / -0

YouTube will ban you for this highly illegal video!

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
7
Lucky777 7 points ago +7 / -0

Been deboonked

14
CmonManDemoWhat76 14 points ago +14 / -0

CNN also said that Cuomo wasn't Jake Fapper and Anderson Poopers cuck...So there is that

6
iPissExcellence 6 points ago +6 / -0

fredo is most definitely the gayest cuck at ccpnn. gayer than pooper and lemon giving xi jinping (winnie the poo) the ol rusty trombone

3
InRevelation12now 3 points ago +3 / -0

Both Fredo & Nipsey Cuomo are commies.

Nipsey? Who dat?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Bm8BSXJhLo

5
Boilingsnowflakes4u 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shit! I broke the rules twice.. No turning back now! Time to start educating commies

465
hillaryprison 465 points ago +465 / -0

The fact that a modern society would even consider using this crap shows how corrupt they are.

Source videos from Coffee County, Georgia (thanks to PezzShivers): https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=46CAKyyObls https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ijjwS6h-PyU

131
TrumpAndGodWin 131 points ago +131 / -0

Digital faggotry has no place in elections!

109
80960KA 109 points ago +109 / -0

I'm fine with primitive digital tabulators on the level of a scantron machine, they can be made low-complexity enough to 100% audit. I'm talking a 8-bit microcontroller with a few K of program memory stored in an immutable ROM on the chip, basically early 80s level of tech.

This shit with interactive GUIs, networking, a full OS...FUCK NO.

61
EvilGuy 61 points ago +61 / -0

Yeah an election machine has no place even having internet built in. So updating is hard? How fucking often do you need to change the software on a voting machine? Should be almost never.

37
GGFFKK 37 points ago +37 / -0

It's like buying a calculator that needs firmware updates for addition or subtraction lol

20
Forty_Five 20 points ago +20 / -0

Right. It's a tabulator, not much going on there. Math doesn't change.

15
bigdickhangsright 15 points ago +15 / -0

It does if it's racist /s

7
Forty_Five 7 points ago +7 / -0

I forgot that math is racist. My bad.

7
MMXX 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sorry, you can't inspect our source code, we use proprietary addition technology.

2
Thedaythe_redditdied 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let me introduce you to common core.

15
LaPastillaEscarlata 15 points ago +15 / -0

Never if it's never online. If it breaks you just replace the machine.

6
barrisabundleofstick 6 points ago +6 / -0

but the internet of things, the touch screen, the sci fi aesthetics...

30
SobekRa 30 points ago +31 / -1

Voter ID, paper ballots with blockchain traceability, ink pad, fingerprint on the chosen candidate, military supervision roaming around the place.

Maximum capacity for every voting station no more than 5000 ballots. If it's a big city, do more voting stations. Workers selected and distributed across counties at random.

Results communicated by phone to central command, on loudspeaker, with witnesses, without knowing how the other stations are doing.

Cameras all over like in a casino + every official with a body cam. All footage remains stored for 24 months

Total cost: probably 5% of what was spent on Dominion

25
sesquipedalian 25 points ago +25 / -0

Blockchain needs to be done in a way that the vote cannot be traced to the voter. It must remain anonymous. If the voter can confirm how he voted, he can sell his vote with his receipt. This will immediately ruin any election. If the government can track it, a hostile government can track down dissenters and supporters of the "evil" candidate and add them to the naughty list.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
sesquipedalian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've got another red pill for you then. In the 1970's as we got new technology, we began recording and publishing congressional votes for the public. So the public could now see democracy in action and hold leaders accountable! Great right?

Nope, that was the day we sold our country to the highest bidding lobbyist. Before that point lobbyists had less influence. A congressman could accept the lobbyists money, and simply vote his conscience, and lie to the lobbyist that he really tried to push the bill through. Since you couldn't guarantee a vote even with a payment, people were not willing to spend as much in lobbying.

Nowadays? Lobbyists hand congressman their bills and tell them that if they don't vote for it, they're not getting money. They can now confirm their vote and buy it! There is a really good video on the subject, but youtube algorithms seem to be hiding it.

This explains the Gilens flat line.

"The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender."

Edit: found the video, but it's a long one. The cardboard box reform

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
7
SobekRa 7 points ago +7 / -0

Absolutely, vote anonimity must be preserved and I think it's possible.

Traceability for example should kick in ONLY if votes get contested in a way that requires an audit.

All the workers would see while counting is a fingerprint in the candidate box and random encryption dots.

Impossible to match it to a voter with the naked eye. The use of any scanner or electronic device other than cameras during the counting process should be banned

The blockchain traceability should be for chain of custody purposes only, within an internal offline system, with a complex encryption key to protect it from any unwarranted intrusion. Once decoded, ballot traceability could look something like a serial number. Example

IL C 28 - 0001 to 5000

Illinois (IL) gave custody to Chicago (C) Voting Station (28) 5000 individually numbered ballots

Again, this is all encrypted. Workers don't knows what number is the ballot they're handing out, the stacks come pre shuffled, not in order.

Voting night should be a very simple process that can't be fucked up.

  1. Voter ID gets scanned upon entrance

  2. Voter proceeds to ballot desk where individual ballot is matched with voter ID

  3. System gives green light to access voting booth

  4. Voter puts fingerprint on chosen candidate

  5. Voter puts folded ballot in a box guarded by the military, who will also observe all the counting process until certification and results call to central command, a process that shouldn't take more than 5/6 hours

Only the decentralized, offline local system has the voter ID and ballot matched and accessing that info would require official audit.

I'm not a tech expert but I imagine this would make cheating very, very hard. And if the fingerprint doesn't match voter ID or ballot number, the vote is invalid. Period.

Responsibilities can be traced back because of chain of custody, diversified system made of many small stations avoid giant fuck ups like invalidanting millions of votes

3
sesquipedalian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Traceability for example should kick in ONLY if votes get contested in a way that requires an audit.

It would be great if we could trust the government to do the right thing, but I think we've recently learned the lesson that we shouldn't. It's better to simply not give them the opportunity to do otherwise.

All they need to do is scan the ballot through a machine that can read the blockchain, and everyone's anonymity is compromised, as that blockchain is already associated with an ID. This could be done quickly and in secret without the public's knowledge or consent. As we already know, this government of ours takes every opportunity, even illegally, to collect all known information on it's citizens in a pursuit of power.

Obama already weaponized the IRS against political opponents. These lists that can be made from this data will only lead to worse outcomes in the end. Even the knowledge alone that your vote is not anonymous to the government will affect votes and be unhealthy for a republic.

3
SobekRa 3 points ago +3 / -0

You raise very good points, I can see how vote anonimity is worth more than a completely fraud-proof system.

Traceability is a double edged sword and it could very well be we can't have the cake and eat too

6
Spaceforce2033 6 points ago +6 / -0

Blockchain basically prints a unique code for every ballot, it becomes impossible for anyone to print extra ballots because it's impossible for them too add new ballots to the chain, so it's easy to detect the fakes and the ones sent across county lines

10
jeffwingersballs 10 points ago +10 / -0

Based on what happened in the key cities of key swing states, it's almost like you need a poly and a background check to be a ballot counter.

12
anon1011101 12 points ago +12 / -0

The Shaniquas they had counting ballots looked like they were pulled straight out of a Section 8 housing project

8
OGTD1 8 points ago +8 / -0

And that’s our fault for letting that happen. The riggers at my polling place have never looked trustworthy especially when I use the R line in primary season. One had an Obummer hat on right next the voting machine.

4
anon1011101 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dominion was paying people off

1
dridas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Source?

11
brassmule 11 points ago +11 / -0

Those are the easiest to scam. Just run the same ballot through 10 times.

12
sickofaltspin 12 points ago +12 / -0

Simple analog fix. Prior to leaving the machine a row of holes is punched at the bottom of the ballot.

8
80960KA 8 points ago +8 / -0

There's easy ways around that even on a very small, very simple system - output a log of all ballot serial numbers scanned in the batch along with the batch tally.

For extra assurance, sign all the output data with a machine-unique private key to ensure it can't be tampered with upstream in the processing chain. Signature bad on a batch -> reject all ballots from that machine and send it off for forensic analysis. Validated crypto engines are available even on very simple platforms now, so this doesn't conflict with low-complexity hardware.

3
preferredfault 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't even need to do that. They can just insert a thumb drive and upload a fake database of ballots as if they were scanned, without ever scanning a single ballot, or scan real ballots as normal then upload from a thumb drive to replace the ballot database with a fake one made months ago. Then after the election is over, they erase everything and go into the physical ballot storage and switch hand made fraud ballots in for the next week after the election, so even a recount wouldn't show anything.

7
AussieTrumpFan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Like those note counting machines at the bank. You physically count the stack first, then toss it in the counting machine to verify. No other information.

5
80960KA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Isn't it great to realize that the shittiest truckstop Injun casino in Nevada almost certainly has a more secure count process than our national election?

Almost like Big Chief Counting Cash cares more about getting his money right than Uncle Sam cares about getting the election right.

4
AnomalusCitizen7375 4 points ago +4 / -0

The fraud proves that Uncle Sam cares about the election results, but not the will of the people.

3
AussieTrumpFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Given how much money is involved in the outcome of an election, you'd think they'd have more vested interest in getting it right (or at least definitely wrong), but it just seems to be a cast of keystone klutzes.

That's one reason Trump was such a threat to the establishment - he came in knowing how to manage his own money (even if people thought he did it badly).

3
OGTD1 3 points ago +3 / -0

So correct me since I’m not IT goon. Wouldn’t her computer(s) be connected to the Internet if she’s using what looked like a Windows desktop setup and furthermore anything connected to the Internet is hackable (especially Windows)?

5
80960KA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not necessarily connected to the internet at large (private net is entirely possible), but almost certainly so. There should be an airgap (logical if not physical isolation of this network from any other lower security network) but I have no reason whatsoever to believe there was one given the general incompetence or malice on display here.

The workstation could be compromised, but as far as remote exploitation, honestly I'd be more concerned with the tabulator itself. Unless explicitly designed with security in mind, embedded systems are usually really good targets because they often run core software (networking/parsing/whatever) libraries that are out of date and have not just security flaws, but security flaws that have been in the wild for years. Embedded systems can be a yuge pain in the ass for corporate infosec, printers have led to major compromises.

What most concerns me about this system is not so much external actors attacking, but that nothing about any of it indicates security was in mind when it was either designed or configured/deployed. Even trivial UI stuff like it doesn't even ask for a password (or better, a user AND supervisor password), when changing a vote is deebly goncerning. There's not even anything in the voting machine software stopping the office janitor from sitting down at the workstation and changing votes while the election manager was taking a shit, and if the election manager herself is the bad actor, she can just do anything she wants. There might be an audit trail, but without confirming and logging the identity of the operator when the change is made there's no way to prove who made a change or why. Just the fact that it lets the user change a vote at all is insane - that should be a formal process where the questionable ballot is shunted into an entirely different queue for manual review, or just rejected outright. It's not an election staffer's place to be interpreting who some idiot that marked both boxes intended to vote for.

This system, or at least this system as configured, is shockingly permissive.

(My background is information security, held multiple senior titles in that field, and I do embedded systems for fun.)

The more I think about this the more I could add to it, but it's already a wall of text. As a security guy this is absolutely horrifying on so many levels.

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It has to be connected to the internet

3
80960KA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Without reviewing the system architecture I can't say that for sure, but we can say we know at least some were, given Dominion techs were mentioned remoting in to fix some "issue" (perhaps DJT winning...) in at least one state.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
-1
Fignugent -1 points ago +7 / -8

you have to understand, you're crying for paper ballots but that's exactly what these are

they're paper

handled by a person

who has absolutely all the capability in the world to nullify your vote

don't cry for paper, you should be crying for open-source blockchain voting

9
NYC_4_Trump 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ok. But if your machine counted 100 votes, but there are only 10 paper ballots, we know something is very wrong.

Their cheating involved vote switching in real time, and the double/triple counting of Biden votes.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also ballot stuffing, also destroying Trump ballots.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
2
what_the_shet 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe both would be needed, blockchain ballots for the digital aspect of it and paper ballots as a backup. Paper ballots should match blockchain ballots.

I've pointed this out about opensource before, but you can't really know for sure that the code that's out on the repo is the code that was released to the voting hardware. So tangible backups are necessary.

5
LaPastillaEscarlata 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's always a way to cheat but however they do it, there must be full transparency.

40
deleted 40 points ago +40 / -0
21
PezzShivers [S] 21 points ago +21 / -0

Exactly. Dominion also has "Ballot Marking Devices" that are used everywhere. They can stick a stack of ballots in and have them marked in seconds.

16
LaPastillaEscarlata 16 points ago +16 / -0

Exactly, they could also just bring them in in suitcases prefilled out weeks before the election.

16
Fr33d0m94 16 points ago +16 / -0

And I don't know, maybe hide them under a table.

7
MysteriousCheese 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's just normal election behavior you silly gooses

3
KARMAAACS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention they can just steal someone's ballots from their mailboxes, or from a ballot collection box or use people's actual ballots on the day, change the vote to whatever they want and change the entire outcome of an election.

If you're in a big enough county and have enough time you can change 200,000 votes. It's literally two clicks per ballot to change the vote from 'Trump to Biden' or 'Jorgensen to Biden' or 'Biden to Trump' or 'whatever candidate to another candidate'.

I think you could easily do a ballot every 3 seconds. So to do 200,000 ballots and change an entire State, one person could do it in around 166 hours, thats 7 days. ONE person can change 200,000 ballots in 7 days. Now imagine if 10 people decided to change the ballots, thats under a day, a few hours to eradicate an entire legitimate election in a state. 10 people can literally change an election.

There's no widespread voter fraud needed. Just 10 election officials deciding in a large county to change the votes. Zero oversight, zero accountability and complete freedom to adjudicate as you please as an election official. How fucking corrupt...

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
7
preferredfault 7 points ago +7 / -0

You can see why such features might be a given and useful under the right circumstances, but the real problem is that there are zero safeguards. The easiest way to go about it even slightly more secure, is for the scanner to individually separate an error ballot and route it to another tray where it can be put in an adjudication pile. But it doesn't even do that.

On top of that, there are no safeguards to even know who adjudicated what. As she demonstrated, you can know that a batch had some issue and was adjudicated, but you don't know which ballot, and if it doesn't know which ballot, then it also clearly doesn't know what the adjudication was. So it won't even tell you that someone changed a ballot to Biden.

That's why they say this system was designed for fraud, because it's soo insecure that it would only be that way because it's designed to allow fraud. While at the same time it doesn't even keep a record beyond marking that a batch was adjudicated somewhere.

And yeah, under NO circumstances should a ballot even be allowed to be adjudicated without spoiling that ballot and forcing them to throw it out or find the person to redo their ballot.

I could see how maybe a bad mark could have an issue being read, but machines are insanely good at reading marks. Even all of your mail gets run through a machine for writing recognition to know how to route it, and even bad chicken scratch writing has no issue going through the mail system sorting machines. But we're talking about a single mark in an oval. The notion that those would need extra adjudication and made easy to adjudicate, has to be 1 in a million ballots that could have an issue somehow.

And even then, it should be a spoiled ballot. That means, tops, in an election, we shouldn't have to adjudicate more than a couple hundred ballots across the whole country combined for a marking error, other than over votes...which can't possibly be adjudicated because there's no possible way for an adjudicator to know the voters intent if 2 candidates in the same box are marked. So we don't even need a system that can adjudicate ballots this easily, because 99% of ballots shouldn't need adjudication at all when it comes to reading marks (minus over voting).

It's like if a top website put an admin panel on their front page that anyone can access, just to make it easy in case the actual admins need to get in and do stuff. Access to such features simply shouldn't be necessary enough to warrant even having it there, and when it is necessary, the ballot should be rejected from the system entirely, permanently, and be considered spoiled, requiring humans to physically sort out what to do with those ballots, with strict records.

2
dridas 2 points ago +2 / -0

These systems also have the Weighted Race Voting feature. That feature is absolutely used in Michigan for the Democratic Party Voting between sectors. Just google Michigan Democratic Rules for voting and elections - ah hell...here it is: https://michigandems.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Rules-for-Voting-and-Elections-converted.pdf

2.6 weighted voting: using the State Allocation of Delegate Vote (SADV) process, whereby each county’s (or portion thereof) delegates within a multi-county Congressional District Convention, caucus, or meeting, or at the State Convention, have a voting strength proportional to the number of Democratic voters from that county (or portion) at the last General Election relative to the total number of Democratic voters in the District or the state, regardless of how many delegates are present at the convention, caucus, or meeting.

So, not only do you have extra ballots, adjudicated ballots, you also have weighted voting. Add in that nobody audits the machines, the logs aren't available for auditors, etc. We aren't getting away from Electronic Tabulators, our politicians are too embedded with Big Tech. The swamp runs deep AF.

I'd add that Federal Election Law needs to add public transparency - log files available in real time, vote counts available in real time, source code available for auditing, block chain watermarks on all ballots, the list goes on!

5
Diotima 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also no way to audit the dominion system to see who changed or added votes beyond a red highlight

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope and you can't even know which ballot was audited. All the red highlight does is say "A" ballot in this batch was adjudicated. Most batches are batches of 50 ballots.

3
Amaroq64 3 points ago +4 / -1

Texas did, and they said "fuck no!"

2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is what's supposed to happen when States are deciding on which voting company/software to buy. They do have Republican and Democrat representatives that meet in every county to inspect a machine and check off weather they approve of it or not, but all they're doing is checking the machine. They arn't checking the voting software like the software of this elections supervisors computer.

2
LilBunnyFuFu4u 2 points ago +2 / -0

there's no QA people on the Republican side?

There is. The uniparty did all the testing they need.

11
PinkFlowers 11 points ago +11 / -0

It looks like a batch is flagged red as having been adjudicated if the operator touched at least 1 ballot in the batch. But if you were to scan a batch of 50 it wouldn't tell you which votes were changed, how they were changed, or how many in the batch were changed. Now imagine in every batch of 50 there is likely at least 1 that honestly needs adjudication (smudges etc), and every batch is flagged red. All record of vote changes is lost. This looks designed to avoid any paper trail of the operator changing votes.

8
Amaroq64 8 points ago +9 / -1

Jesus, I didn't even think of it from that angle. Totally designed to create uncertainty.

"This batch of 1000 is red? Oh yeah I had to correct one of them, don't worry I didn't touch the rest of them and you have no way to check if I did."

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
8
PezzShivers [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's basically already available with Dominion's "Ballot Marking Devices"

4
McPickle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah. It's easier to change votes than it is for me to get Admin access to my own laptop. At least my laptop makes me type in my windows PIN number. Crazy.

18
RocksCanOnlyWait 18 points ago +19 / -1

This has absolutely nothing to do with the system being digital. Adjudication could happen the same with paper ballots. The common flaw is that you're trusting the human doing the adjudication.

13
Shakakka99 13 points ago +13 / -0

Agreed, but even worse: there's no audit trail for the user/operator who did the adjudication.

If I can blanket adjudicate 10,000 votes to Biden out of thin fucking air, and the system won't even recognize who I am? I'm bound to do it. But if it attaches my full name, log-in credentials, date/time of adjudication, etc... to each and every ballot I adjudicate (along with taking a corresponding image of every single adjudicated ballot?) THAT might stop me.

Especially if the Admins could call up a "Number of adjudications by user ID" report and see where the fuckery happened all at once.

I still agree we should go back to paper ballots, double witnesses, etc... But the very fact there's THIS much technology and it's not associating the adjudication with a name or user ID# to keep things honest is... well... totally fucking dishonest.

3
Diotima 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course this would embolden a insider threat. Cybersecuity 101. A Wandrea Moss can go in adjudicate 138000 ballots and flip them all for Biden.

5
NYC_4_Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then the answer is simple: adjudication must be approved by 2 of 3 vote counters.

Or

No adjudication. If your vote is illegible, your ballot is tossed.

5
Spaceforce2033 5 points ago +5 / -0

Honestly, I prefer the illegible route, but that is fatally flawed, what prevents these commies from double marking every Trump supporter ballot and then invalidating them all in that prices.

So triple approvals, and adjudication must be Livestream to the public and they can't raise red flags

2
Diotima 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and full.audit logs and saved image showing what changed were made as well as a justification.

5
habadashery2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Indeed. For me, the use of complex and many-featured voting machines are capable of meeting our public needs, but that is IF all of the machines are properly vetted and do not have major problems like what was shown in the video.

The adjudication ABSOLUTELY needs to have a proper audit trail to guarantee that the job is done right. It is astounding that there is no owner tagged to that.

The box for overvotes is incredibly sketchy if you are allowed to hide it as the supervisor. you are creating a record that is no longer 1-1 between the paper and the actual ballot.

The fact that the supervisor has this much power over the votes shows that watching is absolutely critical at adjudication.

2
Txiribiton 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's why observers were at least 30m away.

11
Kongol626 11 points ago +11 / -0

I mean this can be an easy fix if we had checks and balances. Each ballot has a barcode that works ONLY in that county. When the system scans the ballot it cannot be scanned again. If for some reason it needs to be scanned when it cannot, a supervisors can manually fix this I guess. But that's when you have 2 mfs sitting next to you watching. Or even better, each state invests in having hq cameras streaming over the machines. That way you don't even need someone watching next to you, if you're afraid of covid. Everyone in the world can participate as poll watchers. Also by live streaming it, even if the machine lies, we can go back and watch each ballot one by one.

I dunno I watch too much sci-fi and murder cases lol

4
PezzShivers [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. Ballots can be scanned ad many times as they want

4
johnny96816 4 points ago +4 / -0

But, but how else can Dims get elected.

332
Puppetbones 332 points ago +332 / -0

So you wouldnt be able to see any of this happening if observing from like 20 feet away, let alone no one observing at all...

202
BeefChucker 202 points ago +202 / -0

The vote counts being reported are essentially fiction.

71
deleted 71 points ago +71 / -0
37
80960KA 37 points ago +37 / -0

Yep, this is the epitome of an "untrusted system".

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
13
80960KA 13 points ago +13 / -0

There is like 1000x more anti-tampering technology in a XBOX 360 than there is in these machines.

This is an atrocity in terms of electronic security.

4
whatlike_withacloth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yea but the 360 is only 1/4 the cost (conservative estimate; I could see them selling those machines for $5k/pop).

4
marishiten 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're not even sold. They're rented. The state pays 100 million for contracts and they don't even own the hardware. They fucking lease them.

3
80960KA 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's also 10+ years old!

6
Doctor_Strangelove 6 points ago +6 / -0

And punishment for riggers and their treasonous overseers

4
LoobintheToobin 4 points ago +4 / -0

^This^ Remember Rudy! Crimes need Consequences or they grow.

11
jcpapillon2 11 points ago +11 / -0

This is insane. What is the point of paper ballots to verify the vote, if the vote does not happen until after it is scanned into the computer and diddled by election workers?

If there is a problem where too many ballots are hard to read or over voted, then have a verifier machine for the voter to read the ballot and confirm it is OK before submission.

Once it is submitted, it should be untouched by human hands unless audited.

3
marishiten 3 points ago +3 / -0

Overvoted ballots should NOT pass go. NOT collect $200. If the machine notices an overvote, it's a bad ballot. So sorry, but your vote doesn't count. Either get better at filling the bubble in next time or get a new provider for the scanners/machines.

The problem is that no matter what, there's always going to be a way to cheat. Let's say that ballots have a unique QR code attached so you can't run the same ballot more than once. This is a cool idea. Problem is, how is it checking? You'd need a hashed list of the QR's on every single machine that needs to be updated for every single election or they would need to be networked and hit a central server for the check/verification process. Who runs the updating of the software? Can we trust them? Who runs the server? Can we trust them? What if there's a network outage and the machines can't connect? Does the election just stop?

There are some solutions to these issues (cell routers), but then we're just adding complexity to an already complex process. The most secure way I can think of is making a national holiday for voting day, required ID to vote, paper ballots only, restrictions on absentee voting (ban mail in voting altogether except for deployed servicemen), purging the voter rolls every 4 years. When you count the votes, you have one group count, another group verify the count with a recount team. Discrepancies over 0.5% triggers an audit automatically. Each group has oversight from Republican/Democrat who can challenge the count process at any time for any vote. It then goes to a third group for review. All counts are then verified, confirmed, and all challenges settled or the vote discarded. Rep/Dem oversight needs to both sign off on the count or needs to be overridden by a 2/3 majority. Places where you can vote should also be restricted to 3-4 places max for large cities. 1-2 for towns. It can create lines. So sad. If you can't wait, you can't vote. No ballots will be counted unless there is oversight from both sides. If there isn't one, it doesn't get unsealed and it doesn't get counted unless both are there, in person, to view the process and are able to see/read the ballot.

You make it a labor intensive task and you do it on purpose. Automation means less oversight and less hands touching it. This is bad. For every person looking at the votes, that's one person that can call out cheating.

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It will even take and count a BLANK ballot

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
5
ihatedemocrats 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is beyond ridiculous. This is fucking insanity. This video alone, in my opinion, is enough to nullify the entire election.

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
9
BeefChucker 9 points ago +9 / -0

Some people do not want to see. Maybe 30% of the country? Logic and reason are great until the other side won’t engage in it.

10
EvilGuy 10 points ago +10 / -0

The true leftists are so demoralized they can't even recognize truth anymore. You show them that vid and it's like... "FAKE!" and nothing you can say will ever change their minds. Trump is bad. Right wingers are nazis.

We are going to have to do some serious deprogramming on them.. or just drop them out of helicopters. I really don't care which.

It's honestly only about what 10% of the country and not a good 10%. If there were more they wouldn't have to cheat 72 different ways just to win an election.

5
BeefChucker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe being behind enemy lines I view it as 1% violent agitators and 39% people who do not want to see but will not do anything but complain if the fake election results are tossed.

13
Idiocrasee 13 points ago +13 / -0

After seeing this, who can say that Cali is truly a blue state?? How do we know that Pelosi truly gets elected in SF, CA??

This system shows that if you pay engineers enough money they will design the system to be shitty enough to meet your corrupt specs.

3
BeefChucker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any election conducted with these machines cannot be trusted. You have direct fraud (via programming) or indirect fraud with the machines (via manual overrides/modifications). I personally saw vote counts increase in counties immediately when installed (likely indirect fraud...running fake ballots or multiple passes). They all have to go.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
America_Good_LA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know. How can it be that you have an outcome, but no way to demonstrate it.

27
chambers11 27 points ago +27 / -0

What are you talking about?? That one republican observer could see everything happening in the 5,000,000 sq ft building. This claim of not being able to see anything has been DeBUnKed!!

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +3 / -1

PREBOOONKED

17
PezzShivers [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yeah that was another part of the video that I edited out. At the 4:13 mark when you can hear the guy in the background say, "alright I want yall to step outside with me" They then close the door and take the phone out of the room to the window to show that they are about 6-8 ft away and would not be able to tell what the person on the computer is doing. This was originally 2 videos from youtube that were posted to twitter. I cut the videos and put them together and tried to only include the important parts to make it as short as possible. I felt it was already too long and many people wouldn't watch it. The most important part is at the end so I hope people watch it all.

291
MyTeenageBody 291 points ago +292 / -1

I hope these commies get what needs to come to them!

70
MixedBlacknWhite 70 points ago +72 / -2

I hope they get ....ahem..…what's "commie" to th OKAY WHO THREW THAT!!

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
9
PurestEvil 9 points ago +9 / -0

Unless they are the only ones with diamond armor and swords, they'd be crushed easily. Don't EVER give away your armor and swords!

31
Gurren_Laggan 31 points ago +31 / -0

There's only one way to be a good commie. And me thinks they want to be the best.

6
TrumpAndGodWin 6 points ago +6 / -0

They'll all finally be equal after their helicopter ride.

3
Gurren_Laggan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well communism is a race to the bottom so....wish granted?

3
Boilingsnowflakes4u 3 points ago +3 / -0

So.. no blanks for the squads?

2
Gurren_Laggan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gonna use bacon grease to lube up the ol' peace bringer for them.

12
djt2020ftw 12 points ago +12 / -0

We need those choppers NOW.

5
WhiskeyAndCoffee 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think I hear Johnny marching home right now

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
250
Trump_USA_2020 250 points ago +252 / -2

Can Dominion vote machines scan blank papers and pop out completed arrest warrants for and charges against all Deep State Communists?

31
Vox_Dobad 31 points ago +31 / -0

Asking the important questions

11
johnny96816 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ohhhh, that's the new Sidney-Rudy-Jenna feature.

10
Grond999 10 points ago +10 / -0

Swamp does not lock up swamp.

5
rangers24 5 points ago +5 / -0

Some of them can, Milwaukee had to pause at one point because they ran out of ink if I recall correctly. Why the fuck do you need ink!?

165
deleted 165 points ago +165 / -0
45
TrumpAndGodWin 45 points ago +45 / -0

They'll do whatever we let them do. Someone please figure out how to get tons of people to work together.

20
GucciMane1017 20 points ago +20 / -0

What if we had a website that connects everyone together, and allowed people to freely share information, both social and political?

8
TrumpAndGodWin 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ironic

7
BloodElfSupporter 7 points ago +7 / -0

We need to spread this at the MAGA March in DC this Saturday!

1
tiredofwinning2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

BLM?

16
Time4aCrusade 16 points ago +16 / -0

Makes me wonder how this has been done throughout history. GA went to Jimmy Carter in the 70s, but you couldn't find a single person that voted for that moron. I've said it before....many think Obummer was the worst...you are incorrect. Jimmy Carter is the biggest dumbass in the history of the presidency. From ruining the economy with insane inflation, to bargaining with terrorists, to killing businesses, this guy was and still is a complete fucking idiot. The only useful thing he EVER did was Habitat for Humanity, and that wasn't his idea whatsoever, he just took credit.

We've got to stop the current fraud, and we have to figure out how to prevent this shit from happening again. Makes me wonder if we'll ever have another lib president again if this gets fixed!

20
TurdManJones 20 points ago +20 / -0

Nope, the biggest dumbass was Woodrow Wilson. The guy was the one that accepted the Federal Reserve.

6
wins_bigly 6 points ago +7 / -1

yup. Jackson beat the banks, and Wilson let them right in

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
152
CerebralPimp 152 points ago +156 / -4

Yeah, but will it blend?

52
YeDragonEnergy 52 points ago +52 / -0

Commie smoke! Don’t breathe this!

18
PezzShivers [S] 18 points ago +20 / -2

Huh?

53
MyTeenageBody 53 points ago +53 / -0

It’s a meme from a old YouTube channel where a guy would blend random shit and would say “will it blend” then proceeds to throw object into this blender.

28
BasedTexasCPA 28 points ago +28 / -0

I watched way too many of those in the early days of YouTube...

24
RitcherBelmont 24 points ago +24 / -0

Nowadays we have the hydraulic press and water jet cutting channels

14
Bodiazrising 14 points ago +14 / -0

I know the guy who produced those videos. They're in UT.

13
PezzShivers [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

Lol when I read it I was like... There's no way he could be talking about the youtube series. I guess I was wrong.

6
CerebralPimp 6 points ago +6 / -0

But a good wrong :)

4
MyTeenageBody 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was my first thought not gonna lie. Haha I don’t know how I made the connection.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
NomadicKrow2 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was an advertisement for the blenders his company made. From what I was told, they were actually really fucking good blenders.

2
BasedTexasCPA 2 points ago +2 / -0

My college roommate joked about getting me one because we'd always watch those videos. They're around $900...

19
try4gain 19 points ago +19 / -0

Its a meme sir

17
TexasPiper 17 points ago +17 / -0

An older one but it checks out

6
weallscreamforMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Leave them to me. I will deal with them myself!

11
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
USCG_Vet 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are young child. Ahh, those were the days. Remember folks, always read the comments.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
namechangearoo 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yeah but will it play crysis?

5
CerebralPimp 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shoot, it was playing crisis and... hey you, you’re finally awake!

3
Trumpeteer 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is the question.

3
weallscreamforMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

It blends!

2
weallscreamforMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is the question!!!

128
RyanUpCreek 128 points ago +129 / -1

This was posted hours ago in new. Now a sticky. She demonstrates how easy fraud is committed in Coffee County, GA with dominion technology

44
jager 44 points ago +44 / -0

This is a longer cut

26
PezzShivers [S] 26 points ago +26 / -0

If you want 14min of this here's the two videos it came from. watch in order

  1. https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=46CAKyyObls

  2. https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ijjwS6h-PyU

14
PezzShivers [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yeah someone posted a tweet on here where someone tweeted one of the videos. Then I noticed the twitter feed had two videos. After watching both I thought they were both important so I spliced them together and tried to edit out as much as I could to make the video as short as possible. I almost waited to post it in the morning so more people would see it, but hey 1500 at 2am isn't too shabby

6
ShyRipley 6 points ago +6 / -0

You did good. I watched it all with only 2 cups of coffee under my belt. Thank you for the splice and posting. You know, we all knew this crap was happening, but watching it demonstrated... it's infuriating.

10
ERguy87 10 points ago +10 / -0

Phew. Just listening to her I was worried it could've been from somewhere close to me here in Louisiana. (Obviously north of I10)

6
CyKn 6 points ago +12 / -6

Was she actually cheating and bragging about it to those people or was she just demonstrating?

44
tjsherod 44 points ago +44 / -0

It appears she’s demonstrating it judging by the end of the video

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
4
PezzShivers [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

I couldn't decide weather the videos were made before or after the election.

23
PezzShivers [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

She's on our side.

7
narvster 7 points ago +8 / -1

Yeah, she can't believe the system she's been told to use. So many routes to fraud in it, without highly detailed logging and audit, it's insane.

8
IvIA6A 8 points ago +8 / -0

"does this batch tell you who made changes?"

No, only that a change was made 😳

8
narvster 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yeah, it's really hard with computers to ID who is logged onto a system. I've worked as a developer, development manager and programme manager for years and I've never been able to get a log entry like that...

Joking aside, it's on purpose, no developer would not log that information unless they were told not to, even if only for helping diagnose bugs with a particular user.

5
IvIA6A 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. That is basic compliance type stuff for audits any private sector company and contractor would be required to keep for a number of years.

Wouldn't it be nice to know if a ballot was scanned in at a particular location, in a particular machine, once or more than once, by whom, then rammed through tabulation process?

3
bidensmissingbrain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Depends though, if some generic credentials were used (can easily see that happening in the big city counties) you'd have no idea who was actually at the station.

Not to mention that, at least in this video, the PC is clearly connected to the internet, so who knows if some foreign actor could be fucking with the ballot count under the guise of someone else's account.

2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

But you can't even tell which ballot was adjudicated in a batch. Most batches are 50 ballots.

20
oraoraoraora 20 points ago +20 / -0

Copy/pasted from below:

it's a southern thing, it's kind of like Sarcasm. She's not bragging, she's basically saying "Well, you think that's fucked up? Wait till you see what I do now!" She's illustrating the absurdity of the whole thing by being cute and matter of fact.

8
2
IvIA6A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good for them. Based on what is in this video, no honest person could.

114
djt2020ftw 114 points ago +114 / -0

This whole election should be tossed!🤬

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
5
OconusLurex 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fortunately and unfortunately, the constitution does not allow a new election for the presidency. The measures in place to manage a disputed election - lawsuits, legislature reappointing electors, and if that does not get anyone to 270, 1 vote per state congress - are the only ones allowed by the constitution.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
15
WaitingOnTheDay 15 points ago +15 / -0

Like Swalwell's salad!

7
gaijin_ronin 7 points ago +7 / -0

no like obummer did to big mike

11
BlackPillBot 11 points ago +11 / -0

It will be. The whole thing is a farce, and if GEOTUS doesn’t find a way to have them all arrested and prosecuted for treason with hopefully the death penalty to soon follow, we have no country, because it will never change, and elections will be meaningless from here on out. Let’s be honest, they’ve been manipulated for years. As it stands now I will never vote again until this shit is taken care of with many examples made, and I’m one of around twenty people I know who feel the same exact way.

101
Ekgamut 101 points ago +101 / -0

Boom, that’s a hard evidence.

58
deleted 58 points ago +58 / -0
29
Weallseethetruth 29 points ago +29 / -0

No shit!!!! How hard did they fight to keep this video private?? ... This seems like a small town and maybe they didn't want to be the ones to have to get this out there and be attacked!! If they do I'll gladly go down there to help protect them!!!! ... This is huge and needs to be shared all around the world right fucking now!!! She just proved EVERYTHING being said about Dominion!!! FINALLY!!!!

19
Krat 19 points ago +19 / -0

You arent allowed to know how it works. That would be proprietary information

9
Trumpeteer 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well now we know. And it’s now archived. Everyone else please do your own archiving using https://y2mate.com and the below links:

Video Pt. 1 - https://youtu.be/46CAKyyObls

Video Pt. 2 - https://youtu.be/ijjwS6h-PyU

4
Peaceful-Riot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Saved. Thanks.

5
fbeeee 5 points ago +5 / -0

The preservation of American freedom is more important than some shitty chinese company's profits.

9
BloodElfSupporter 9 points ago +9 / -0

The American people deserve to know the truth!!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
9
AlcoholicRetard 9 points ago +9 / -0

That’s impossible, there is no evidence, it’s been debonked.

7
nodoxplz 7 points ago +7 / -0

There is no evidence. Now carry on, citizen, we've got a war to win against Eastasia!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
98
DJTrumpMAGA 98 points ago +98 / -0

Now you know why YouTube made an announcement yesterday about removing videos that dispute fraud. When people see this indisputable evidence it will shock them. Some won't be able to ignore it. And then there will be MORE and MORE. It's a drip to wake the normies.

22
Weallseethetruth 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yes sir!!! This is it man!! We fucking won!! This needs to be spread far and wide!!! I'm in the process of sending it to everyone I know I don't care what time it is!!!! This is the smoking gun and if this doesn't turn this around it'll be war!!! This is unacceptable and EVERYONE will know it!!!!! Get this out to THE WORLD!!!!

5
OGTexasPede 5 points ago +5 / -0

We haven't won until we're certain our country and way of life are free from communists and commie sympathizers. We need to bring back Mccarthyism.

3
Weallseethetruth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Totally agree!!! But this is it!! If this doesn't give Trump the Presidency then there will be war.... Because this is proof and lines up with what all the witnesses were saying!! This is it!!!

3
IvIA6A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Chop chop youtube. You've made a lot of work for yourself now that you've dumped your 230 protection and became a publisher.

2
Vla1ne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Streisand effect in 3... 2... 1...

68
TacticalFannypack 68 points ago +69 / -1

DEBOONKED

16
VoteCyborgTrump2040 16 points ago +17 / -1

This is fucking deboooonked you drumpftards. Stop spreading this misinformation.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
Ponzo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here is a better view after rotating it so they can deboonk it

https://streamable.com/bmg82d

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
59
guitarmastershredder 59 points ago +59 / -0

This same county said they could not certify their votes or something like that

54
40-More-Years 54 points ago +54 / -0

Probably because they actually have someone with morals working there, this woman may have just helped save America. She just disproved every talking point the media and democrats have used about dominion machines.

20
chambers11 20 points ago +20 / -0

People need to start buying commercial time on tv and just blast these videos that show fraud over and over again

10
Weallseethetruth 10 points ago +10 / -0

Fuck yeah she did buddy!!! This is fucking huge y'all!!!! I'm almost fucking misty here!!! I will tell you one thing,.. After this, if they don't turn this around it's going to be a war!!! This is unacceptable and needs to be spread far and wide!!!! Every single person in here needs to share this on every sight and with everyone they know right away!! Time is of the essence!!!

2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure if this was from that covfefe county or not. The guy did include these videos while talking about Coffee county though.

57
remember1776 57 points ago +58 / -1

🤬

50
deleted 50 points ago +50 / -0
20
TheBaizuoXe 20 points ago +20 / -0

The fact that this is the first we get to see it shows how unscrupulous nearly all of these election officials are... anyone using the software and NOT blowing the whistle is as good as guilty, IMO.

10
Weallseethetruth 10 points ago +10 / -0

Fuck yeah it is man!!! This is it!! This is what we needed!!! This calls EVERYTHING into doubt!! ESPECIALLY since it lines up with all the affidavit and evidence!! I'm so fucking stoked about this!!! If this doesn't turn this thing around there's going to be war!!!! This is fucking unacceptable!!!!

3
PezzShivers [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you want 14min of this here's the two videos it came from. watch in order

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=46CAKyyObls

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ijjwS6h-PyU

5
Weallseethetruth 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks man!!! I could watch this over and over... It seriously almost brought tears to my eyes because this is the proof we needed!!! After arguing with so many people and knowing we're right and it's not having that one solid thing... But now with all that's already going on and now this!!!! This is so huge!!! I mean this pretty much called into question every single fucking area that used these machines!!!! This is a beautiful thing!! And they just look like GA citizens who saw something that didn't look right and did the right thing!!! I really hope she's right about what she said she was doing!!!! .... Now I'm reeeeally anxious to see what happens with the machines they got from Michigan????

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let me know if you want to download the videos so you can have them. I'll send you the links ti do that.

2
Weallseethetruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

I already found it! Lol ... I shared that shit so over last night with everyone in my contacts just about!!! Lol ... And on Facebook (as long as it'll last)

3
HuggableBear 3 points ago +3 / -0

It means there is literally no chain of custody for even a single ballot. Every vote cast in this election on these machines is now suspect.

If this were a criminal trial, all evidence collected in this way would be thrown out immediately and with great prejudice.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
50
busyDad 50 points ago +50 / -0

This lady will be the only one the FBI arrests

29
deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
9
GastonP1000 9 points ago +9 / -0

And a full swat team too!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
keep_america_great 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Mrs Smith was arrested this morning by FBI agents with charges of defacing government property after it was revealed she had neglected to procure a book cover for her 9th grade chemistry textbook."

43
Lars_Lindemann 43 points ago +45 / -2

She explains the process like she's giving him a recipe for fried chicken. This corruption runs so fucking deep...

45
WestCoastG 45 points ago +45 / -0

she explains the process like she's giving him a recipe for fried chicken.

Barr has entered the chat

This corruption runs so fucking deep...

Barr has left the chat

8
Lars_Lindemann 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dude, you're a beast! I didn't realize how I set this up, but you did. bravo, pede.

5
WestCoastG 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol

3
ActionExpress 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have the best wordsmiths!

3
KILLARY4PRISON 3 points ago +3 / -0

This comment is a winner folks!

22
tjsherod 22 points ago +22 / -0

I got the impression it was a demonstration of flaws not necessarily bragging

8
Lars_Lindemann 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm going to have to watch the entire video. Now you've got me second guessing. If it's a friendly demo from an Auditor, they definitely have a shit camera man. Fair point, thanks.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
9
Lars_Lindemann 9 points ago +9 / -0

I feel bad that I doubted the nice lady. She's been a fren the whole time. I bet she makes great fried chicken.

3
barrisabundleofstick 3 points ago +3 / -0

wellllllllllllll would you look at that

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here are the entire videos. some of what I cut out would probably help you see that she's on our side and was demonstrating

14mins. watch in order

  1. https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=46CAKyyObls

  2. https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ijjwS6h-PyU

3
FormerGraveheart 3 points ago +3 / -0

Youtube? They'll remove those shortly.

2
Lars_Lindemann 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, patriot. I'm on it.

2
Lars_Lindemann 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ho Li Fuk. The last 2 minutes of the first video, and all of the second video (the one I'd never seen) prove that this is a demonstration of the crooked Dominion software. She would be what we call an expert witness. I still think her fried chicken is better than KFC. Thanks for the info and second video.

2
1standboobs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got these backed up info another service somewhere?

2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you would like to download them yourself to make sure they don't go anywhere then just click these links

Although these look like youtube links they're not. Click the link then select the quality/size video you want and hit download. You need both links

1.https://m.youtubepp.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=46CAKyyObls

2.https://m.youtubepp.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=ijjwS6h-PyU

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
BlackPillBot 10 points ago +10 / -0

I’m pretty sure she exposing it, not taking advantage of it. At one point I think I even heard her say something like and this is the part that really upsets me.

6
Lars_Lindemann 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup. It was an expose. A poorly filmed one, but certainly a MOAB of spice.

They really thought they would get away with it. They had no idea how much last minute scrambling they would have to do.

3
BlackPillBot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea sir.

2
Lars_Lindemann 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, fren. I'm on my first cup of the day. I need to watch the entire video.

3
BlackPillBot 3 points ago +3 / -0

NP. We have to help each other manage and spread all of this information, because it’s all coming at us so fast with so little time to spread and expose it. It’s almost as if there should be a government agency to mange and deal with all of this that we fund with our stolen tax dollars, you know, like for the good of the country. 😞

2
Lars_Lindemann 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sometimes it's as if we're drinking water from a fire hose. So much evidence...

3
BlackPillBot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fire hoses are resist fren. Didn’t you get the memo? 😁

3
friedchicken 3 points ago +3 / -0

You called?

2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's on our side.

38
DeplorableDC 38 points ago +39 / -1

Its a feature!

35
TexasSupreme 35 points ago +37 / -2

comment for purpose of finding later

23
Moderate_Uruk_hai 23 points ago +23 / -0

There is a save feature under each post and comment. It's very useful

7
TrumpAndGodWin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just remember to write down your password... or pay a hypnotist to recover it (I've only used self hypnosis, but it works, with practice)

4
Bossman28894 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same

2
friedchicken 2 points ago +2 / -0

+1

2
GGFFKK 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish we could create bookmarks like netscape

2
ILearnedToCode 2 points ago +2 / -0

Theres a "save" button beneath each post and comment. You can create different categories to save into.

1
GGFFKK 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want netscape navigator inside google chrome so I can create bookmarks inside netscape

1
UnwaveringDefiance 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too bad :/

30
Warrior_of_the_Faith 30 points ago +32 / -2

Okay people, move along, nothing to see here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW6RWSiR88s

6
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
29
guitarmastershredder 29 points ago +29 / -0

I love my honest southern statesmen...

Georgia still has lots of good

4
Bossman28894 4 points ago +4 / -0

Works fine for honest people, but opens door for deceitful folk

3
tiredofwinning2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why all be, sure does. Like dem der spots on a cow. Some of em ‘er smooth others are not.

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

M, R, ducks... M, R, not... O, S, M, R... L, I, B... M, R, ducks!

28
40-More-Years 28 points ago +29 / -1

But...but the media told me you could only scan ballots once, and that you couldn’t change who people voted for. THIS IS DEBOOONKERED

26
OutcastSeal 26 points ago +27 / -1

Yeah we all knew. Nobody seems to give a fuck about the fraud. They'll get whats comig next election when we rig it better

7
end_of_globalism 7 points ago +7 / -0

Trap doors over pits with spikes in the floor under each commie. Guess what happens when they cheat?

25
deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
Weallseethetruth 4 points ago +4 / -0

This needs to be shared across the world!!! These machines are all around the world!! This could create the great awakening for real!! This is it man!! This is the smoking gun!!!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
23
TonyVilla 23 points ago +23 / -0

Are those East Texas accents?

Sounds like East Texas accents.

24
djt2020ftw 24 points ago +24 / -0

This is in Coffee, Georgia

12
Mr_clark 12 points ago +12 / -0

I fucking love parts of my state. Atlanta can fucking rot though.

4
grenades_and_ham 4 points ago +4 / -0

William Tecumseh Sherman entered the chat

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure that it is. The guy that was tweeting about the Coffee votes put these videos in the thread though

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
11
bennordin21 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don’t believe Texas used dominion at all

5
Hereforagoodtime 5 points ago +5 / -0

They did not!

7
remember1776 7 points ago +7 / -0

King of the Hill?

King of the Hill!

4
oraoraoraora 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shit I was thinking the same thing but she's in Georgia. I do hear a slight difference but it's subtle.

22
iliv4gamez 22 points ago +22 / -0

Fuck this makes me so angry!

11
BloodElfSupporter 11 points ago +11 / -0

No wonder Biden didn’t need to campaign and had been hiding in the basement. With this baby you can generate as many votes as you want just from empty ballots!

Lmaoooooooo

3
Weallseethetruth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Me too brother and if this doesn't overturn this it will be war!!! ... This is what we needed and it needs to be spread to everyone you know on every platform you can put it on!!! This is the smoking gun!!! God bless these fat GA peaches man!!! We just won!!

20
justin_tolerable 20 points ago +20 / -0

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

2
GastonP1000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn, I just got flashbacks to my 9th-grade world history teacher. He was an asshoe.

19
MyRigga 19 points ago +19 / -0

How can the ballots not be serialized!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
KILLARY4PRISON 7 points ago +7 / -0

How about just a unique ID to prevent the SAME BALLOT from getting ran again?

3
BloodElfSupporter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Asking the important questions here

3
weallscreamforMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

On currency paper! No counterfeits!

17
americafirst1337 17 points ago +17 / -0

This has been pre-bunked by multiple sources.

16
learntocode 16 points ago +16 / -0

Digital votings entire purpose was to allow fewer and fewer people to have the power, with a mouse click, to pick the winners in an election.

Paper ballots only. Follow the law. Fuck the rest.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
16
Tookens 16 points ago +16 / -0

You wouldn't believe how many ballots you can stuff in that baby.

2
weallscreamforMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s what she said.

Slut.

1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

kek

16
FUCKTHEDNC 16 points ago +18 / -2

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST WTF WITH THE FILMING ANGLE

7
Lars_Lindemann 7 points ago +9 / -2

He probably had the phone in his shirt pocket. The dude is James O'Keefe based. He was deeep undercover.

3
PezzShivers [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol naw the lady is the one filming at the end. They took the video to prove how vulnerable the system is.

2
bidensmissingbrain 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea, she even says at the end "I'm gonna stop [filming] now."

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
TheBaizuoXe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems a whole lotta the good drops happen overnight.

2
PezzShivers [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bro tell me about it. I planned on posting it so a few people could see it and then I was going to post it again at 8am. After I refreshed my page though it was stickied with like 800 upvotes lol. So now i'm screwed bc by the time morning comes around this will have already been un-stickied and the algorithm will have already flushed it off the "Hot" page. So when I repost it tomorrow there's no way in hell it will be stickied again so not as many people will see it.

I know this will be un-stickied by morning time. My only hope is that the algorithm will still have yet to push it off the page entirely.

13
learntocode 13 points ago +13 / -0

BANNED ON YOUTUBE

THE AP HAS CALLED THE ELECTION!!!!!

REEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

13
AmericaFirstMAGA88 13 points ago +13 / -0

Every county that used these machines needs to be thrown out immediately if not sooner

11
OneMorePatriot 11 points ago +11 / -0

WTF!!! This is the definition of FUCKED UP!

3
BloodElfSupporter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, Biden could have as many votes as he wants, probably more than the entire US population if he wanted. This shit is serious. I always wondered how they steal votes...they don’t, they just use a little Dominion magic to create new votes from empty ballots!

11
PresElectLigmaBalls 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ho Ree Fuk.... Sum Ting Wong....

3
BloodElfSupporter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kek

11
TheBehavingBeaver 11 points ago +11 / -0

Saved

10
lenchodahated 10 points ago +10 / -0

this shit is heartbreaking...

10
cryptoconservative 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is insane.

10
ChocolateEvryday 10 points ago +10 / -0

Holy shit.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
7
neehl 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’ve been refreshing regularly to see when it would go down. Looks like for 11 hours, free speech was still a thing.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
9
hillaryprison 9 points ago +9 / -0

Does anyone know the source of this video- who, where, when?

3
BloodElfSupporter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone said it’s Coffee County, GA

9
redhot_alex 9 points ago +9 / -0

STREAMABLE FUCKING SMASHED THE VIDEO NOOOOO

9
The_DonaldFan 9 points ago +10 / -1

THIS VIDEO IS

DIISSSSSSSSPOOOOOTTTTTEEEDDDDDDD

9
cryptoconservative 9 points ago +10 / -1

Senator, this is the first time this video has been made public, how can it be debunked?

3
The_DonaldFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not debonked.

It's dispooted.

Very different things. We just have the media so you know like believe us! Stop thinking for yourself

reeeeeeeee

1
ShyRipley 1 point ago +2 / -1

PRE-BOOOOOOONKED!!!1!!

9
Lovepede 9 points ago +9 / -0

And the affidavits say the rooms in which this adjudication process was happening was completely taken over by the supervisors in the five cities, observers kicked out and kept out. Not even Democrat observers allowed.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
9
Xirturn1984 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is really an all in one system. I’m surprised Black and Decker didn’t make it

9
FUCKTHEDNC 9 points ago +9 / -0

HOOO LEEE FUKKKKKKK

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
2
AussieTrumpFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Youtube's going to pull that now. It no longer agrees with their Groupthink.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
PezzShivers [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was after election. Some people are saying it's from Coffee County, Georgia where they refused to certify the electric recount bc they said the Dominion Voting machine had too many flaws and couldn't replicate an of it's counts. They are saying that this is a video of the election supervisors/auditors looking at the system?! I'm not sure.

8
chieflemons 8 points ago +8 / -0

Is this..... Another Kraken?