7973
Comments (1029)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
Fignugent -1 points ago +7 / -8

you have to understand, you're crying for paper ballots but that's exactly what these are

they're paper

handled by a person

who has absolutely all the capability in the world to nullify your vote

don't cry for paper, you should be crying for open-source blockchain voting

9
NYC_4_Trump 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ok. But if your machine counted 100 votes, but there are only 10 paper ballots, we know something is very wrong.

Their cheating involved vote switching in real time, and the double/triple counting of Biden votes.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also ballot stuffing, also destroying Trump ballots.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
2
what_the_shet 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe both would be needed, blockchain ballots for the digital aspect of it and paper ballots as a backup. Paper ballots should match blockchain ballots.

I've pointed this out about opensource before, but you can't really know for sure that the code that's out on the repo is the code that was released to the voting hardware. So tangible backups are necessary.

5
LaPastillaEscarlata 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's always a way to cheat but however they do it, there must be full transparency.