7973
Comments (1029)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
13
Shakakka99 13 points ago +13 / -0

Agreed, but even worse: there's no audit trail for the user/operator who did the adjudication.

If I can blanket adjudicate 10,000 votes to Biden out of thin fucking air, and the system won't even recognize who I am? I'm bound to do it. But if it attaches my full name, log-in credentials, date/time of adjudication, etc... to each and every ballot I adjudicate (along with taking a corresponding image of every single adjudicated ballot?) THAT might stop me.

Especially if the Admins could call up a "Number of adjudications by user ID" report and see where the fuckery happened all at once.

I still agree we should go back to paper ballots, double witnesses, etc... But the very fact there's THIS much technology and it's not associating the adjudication with a name or user ID# to keep things honest is... well... totally fucking dishonest.

3
Diotima 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course this would embolden a insider threat. Cybersecuity 101. A Wandrea Moss can go in adjudicate 138000 ballots and flip them all for Biden.