7973
Comments (1029)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
dridas 2 points ago +2 / -0

These systems also have the Weighted Race Voting feature. That feature is absolutely used in Michigan for the Democratic Party Voting between sectors. Just google Michigan Democratic Rules for voting and elections - ah hell...here it is: https://michigandems.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Rules-for-Voting-and-Elections-converted.pdf

2.6 weighted voting: using the State Allocation of Delegate Vote (SADV) process, whereby each county’s (or portion thereof) delegates within a multi-county Congressional District Convention, caucus, or meeting, or at the State Convention, have a voting strength proportional to the number of Democratic voters from that county (or portion) at the last General Election relative to the total number of Democratic voters in the District or the state, regardless of how many delegates are present at the convention, caucus, or meeting.

So, not only do you have extra ballots, adjudicated ballots, you also have weighted voting. Add in that nobody audits the machines, the logs aren't available for auditors, etc. We aren't getting away from Electronic Tabulators, our politicians are too embedded with Big Tech. The swamp runs deep AF.

I'd add that Federal Election Law needs to add public transparency - log files available in real time, vote counts available in real time, source code available for auditing, block chain watermarks on all ballots, the list goes on!